Evaluation of Traditional Methods in Construction and Their Effects on Reinforced-Concrete Buildings Behavior

Using ETABS software, this study analyzed 23
buildings to evaluate effects of mistakes during construction phase on
buildings structural behavior. For modelling, two different loadings
were assumed: 1) design loading and 2) loading due to the effects of
mistakes in construction phase. Research results determined that
considering traditional construction methods for buildings resulted in
a significant increase in dead loads and consequently intensified the
displacements and base-shears of buildings under seismic loads.





References:
[1] B. Ellirtgwood, “Design and Construction Error Effects on Structural
Reliability”, Journal of Structural Engineering, J. Struct. Eng., 113(2),
1987, 409–422.
[2] A. Doğangün, Ö. Tuluk, R. Livaoğlu, R. Acar, “Traditional
wooden buildings and their damages during earthquakes in Turkey”,
Engineering Failure Analysis, Volume 13, Issue 6, September
2006, Pages 981-996.
[3] M. Celikag, S. Naimi, “Building Construction in North Cyprus:
Problems and Alternatives Solutions”, Procedia Engineering, Volume
14, 2011, Pages 2269-2275.
[4] O. Kwon, C. Park, C. Lim, “A defect management system for reinforced
concrete work utilizing BIM, image-matching and augmented reality”,
Automation in Construction, Volume 46, October 2014, Pages 74-81.
[5] S. O. Ekolu, Y. Ballim, “Technology transfer to minimize concrete
construction failures”, Proceedings from the International Conference on
Advances in Engineering and Technology, 2006, Pages 91-98.
[6] P. Love, R. Lopez, J. Kim, M. Kim, “Probabilistic Assessment of Design
Error Costs”, Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities, 28(3),
(2014). 518-527.
[7] B. Ellingwood, “Acceptable risk bases for design of structures”,
Progress in Structural Engineering and Materials, 3(2), 2001, 170-179.
[8] A. Atkinson, “The role of human error in construction
defects”, Structural Survey, 17(4), 1999, 231-236.
[9] M. Stewart, “Simulation of human error in reinforced concrete design”,
Research in Engineering Design, 4(1), 1992, 51-60.