Effects of Roughness on Forward Facing Step in an Open Channel

Experiments were performed to investigate the effects of roughness on the reattachment and redevelopment regions over a 12 mm forward facing step (FFS) in an open channel flow. The experiments were performed over an upstream smooth wall and a smooth FFS, an upstream wall coated with sandpaper 36 grit and a smooth FFS and an upstream rough wall produced from sandpaper 36 grit and a FFS coated with sandpaper 36 grit. To investigate only the wall roughness effects, Reynolds number, Froude number, aspect ratio and blockage ratio were kept constant. Upstream profiles showed reduced streamwise mean velocities close to the rough wall compared to the smooth wall, but the turbulence level was increased by upstream wall roughness. The reattachment length for the smooth-smooth wall experiment was 1.78h; however, when it is replaced with rough-smooth wall the reattachment length decreased to 1.53h. It was observed that the upstream roughness increased the physical size of contours of maximum turbulence level; however, the downstream roughness decreased both the size and magnitude of contours in the vicinity of the leading edge of the step. Quadrant analysis was performed to investigate the dominant Reynolds shear stress contribution in the recirculation region. The Reynolds shear stress and turbulent kinetic energy profiles after the reattachment showed slower recovery compared to the streamwise mean velocity, however all the profiles fairly collapse on their corresponding upstream profiles at x/h = 60. It was concluded that to obtain a complete collapse several more streamwise distances would be required.




References:
[1] H. Ren and Y. Wu, “Turbulent boundary layers over smooth and rough forward-facing steps,” Phys. Fluids. 23 (2011), 045102.
[2] Y. Wu and H. Ren, “On the impacts of coarse-scale models of realistic roughness on a forward-facing step turbulent flow,” Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, Vol. 40, pp. 15–31.
[3] E. E. Essel, S. Mali, E. W. Thacher and M. F. Tachie, “Upstream roughness effects on reattached turbulent flow over forward facing step,” 10th International ERCOFTAC Symposium on Engineering Turbulence Modelling and Measurements, Spain, September 2014.
[4] M. F. Tachie, R. Balachandar and D. J. Bergstrom, “Open channel boundary layer relaxation behind a forward facing step at low Reynolds numbers,” Journal of Fluids Engineering, Vol. 123, pp. 539-545, September 2001. [5] M. Agelinchaab and M. F. Tachie, “PIV study of separated and reattached open channel flow over surface mounted blocks,” Journal of Fluids Engineering, Vol. 130, pp. 061206-1-061206-9, June 2008.
[6] J. F. Largeau and V. Moriniere, “Wall pressure fluctuations and topology in separated flows over a forward-facing Step,” Exp. Fluids, Vol. 42, pp. 21–40.
[7] V. De Brederode and P. Bradshaw, “Three-dimensional flow in nominally two-dimensional separation bubbles: flow behind a rearward-facing step,” Imp. Coll. Aeronaut. Rep., pp. 72–19.
[8] K. A. Flack and M. P. Schultz, “Review of Hydraulic Roughness Scales in the Fully Rough Regime,” J. Fluids Eng. 132, 041203–10.
[9] D. J. Forliti, P. J. Strykowski, and K. Debatin, “Bias and precision errors of digital particle image velocimetry,” Exp. Fluids. 28 (2000), pp. 436–447.
[10] L. Casarsa and P. Giannattasio, “Three-dimensional features of the turbulent flow through a planar sudden expansion,” Phys. Fluids. 20 (2008), 015103.
[11] E.E. Essel, A. Nematollahi, E.W. Thacher and M.F. Tachie, “Effects of upstream roughness and Reynolds number on separated and reattached turbulent flow,” Journal of Turbulence, Vol. 16, Issue 9, 2015.
[12] P. Bradshaw and F. Y. F. Wong, “The reattachment and relaxation of a turbulent boundary layer,” J. Fluid Mech., Vol. 52, part 1, pp. 113-135, 1972.
[13] S. S. Lu and W. W. Willmarth, “Measurement of the structure of the Reynolds stress in a turbulent boundary layer,” J. Fluid Mech., Vol. 60(part 3), pp. 481–511, 1973.
[14] Y. Wu and K. T. Christensen, “Outer-layer similarity in the presence of a practical rough-wall topography,” Phys. Fluids 19, 085108, 2007.