Effect of Open-Ended Laboratory toward Learners Performance in Environmental Engineering Course: Case Study of Civil Engineering at Universiti Malaysia Sabah

Laboratory activities have produced benefits in
student learning. With current drives of new technology resources
and evolving era of education methods, renewal status of learning
and teaching in laboratory methods are in progress, for both learners
and the educators. To enhance learning outcomes in laboratory works
particularly in engineering practices and testing, learning via handson
by instruction may not sufficient. This paper describes and
compares techniques and implementation of traditional (expository)
with open-ended laboratory (problem-based) for two consecutive
cohorts studying environmental laboratory course in civil engineering
program. The transition of traditional to problem-based findings and
effect were investigated in terms of course assessment student
feedback survey, course outcome learning measurement and student
performance grades. It was proved that students have demonstrated
better performance in their grades and 12% increase in the course
outcome (CO) in problem-based open-ended laboratory style than
traditional method; although in perception, students has responded
less favorable in their feedback.

• N. Bolong
• J. Makinda
• I. Saad

• Engineering education
• open-ended laboratory
• environmental engineering lab.

[1] Rahman NA., N. T. Kofli, M. S. Takriff, S.R.S.Abdullah, (2011)
Comparative Study between Open Ended Laboratory and Traditional
Laboratory, 2011 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference
(EDUCON)
[2] Hamid R., S. Baharom, M. R.Taha, A. A. A. Kasim, (2012), Sustainable
and Economical Open-Ended Project for Materials Technology Course
Laboratory Work, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 60 ( 2012 )
3 – 7
[3] Domin D.S, (1999), A Review of Laboratory Instruction Styles, Vol. 76
No. 4 April 1999, Journal of Chemical Education
[4] Kelly O. and Finlayson O. (2009), A hurdle too high? Students’
experience of a PBL laboratory module, Chem. Educ. Res. Pract., 2009,
10, 42–52
[5] Megat J. M. M. N., Mohd Saleh Jaafar, Wan Hamidon Wan
Badaruzzaman, Azlan Abdul Aziz, Suhaimi Abdul Talib, (2012)
Determining Accreditation Decision, presented at the EAC Workshop on
Review of Evaluation Panel Reports, Marriot Hotel, Putrajaya, 24‐26
Oct 2008 (updated 2012)
[6] McKinnon M.M., (1999), Core elements of student motivation in PBL,
New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 78, 49-58.
[7] Gungat L., Asrah H., Bolong N., Makind J., (2011), Comparison Study
on the Assessment Approach of Course Outcome, Proceedings – 3rd
International Congress on Engineering Education, ICEED2011 7-8 Dis
2011 Malaysia, pp. 114-119. 978-1-4577-1259-3/11@ IEEEXplore
[8] Azer S.A, R. Hasanato, S. Al-Nassar, A. Somily and M.M AlSaadi,
(2013), Introducing integrated laboratory classes in a PBL curriculum:
impact on student’s learning and satisfaction, BMC Medical Education
2013, 13:71
[9] Baird, B. N. (1991), In class poster session, Teaching of Psychology.
1991, 18, 27–28
[10] Johnstone A.H. and Al-Shuaili A., (2001), Learning in the laboratory;
some thoughts from the literature, University Chemistry Education, 5,
42-51.