Since the evolution of computational tools and simulation software, there has been considerable increase in research on Soil Structure Interaction (SSI) to decrease the computational time and increase accuracy in the results. To aid the designer with a proper understanding of the response of structure in different soil types, the presented paper compares the deformation, shear stress, acceleration and other parameters of multi-storey building for a specific input ground motion using Response-spectrum Analysis (RSA) method. The response of all the models of different heights have been compared in different soil types. Finite Element Simulation software, ANSYS, has been used for all the computational purposes. Overall, higher response is observed with SSI, while it increases with decreasing stiffness of soil.
[1] Okabe S., “General Theory of Earth Pressure,” Jour. of the Japanese Society of Civil Engrs, Tokyo, Japan (1926).
[2] Mononabe N. and Matsuo H., “On the Determination of Earth Pressure During Earthquakes,” Proc. of the World Eng. Conf., Vol. 9, p. 176 (1929).
[3] Reissner E. (1936): “Stationäre, axialsymmetrische, durch eine schüttelnde Masse erregte Schwingung eines homogenen elastischen Halbraum”, Ing.-Archiv, Vol. VII, Nr. 6, 381-396.
[4] Luco J. E. and Westman R. A.: 1971, “Dynamic Response of Circular Footings”, J. Eng. Mechanics Div. ASCE 97 (EM5), 1381–1395.
[5] Veletsos A.S. and Wei Y.T. (1971): “Lateral and Rocking Vibration of Footings”, J. Soil. Mech. Found. Div., ASCE, 97, 1227-1248.
[6] Kausel E., Whitman R.V., Morray J.P, and Elsabee, F. (1978). “The spring method for embedded foundations”, Nuclear Engineering and Design, 48, 377–392.
[7] Holler S. and Meskouris Konstantin (2006) “Granular material silos under dynamic excitation: Numerical simulation and experimental validation”, Journal of structural engineering ISSN: 0733-9445, Vol. 132, No.10, pp. 1573-1579.
[8] Li T., Zhang Z. and Shi L. (2009), "Influences of Pile-Soil-Structure Interaction on Seismic Response of Self Anchored Suspension Bridge", The Electronic Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, EJGE.
[9] Livaoğlu R, Doğangün A (2007). “Effects of foundation embedment on seismic behaviour of the elevated tanks considering fluid-structure-soil interaction”. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. 27: 855–863.
[10] Nasreddin el Mezaini (2006), “Effects of Soil-Structure Interaction on the Analysis of Cylindrical Tanks”, Practical Periodical on Structural Design and Construction”, Volume 11, Issue 1, pp. 50-57.
[11] Mylonakis G, Gaazetas G (2000) Seismic soil-structure interaction: beneficial or detrimental. J Earthquake Eng 4(3):277–301.
[12] Wolf JP (1985) Dynamic soil ± structure interaction. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
[13] Wolf JP (1988) Soil ± structure interaction analysis in time domain. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
[14] Clough RW, Penzien J (1993) Dynamics of Structures, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, Tokyo.
[15] Gupta S, Lin TW, Penzien J, Yeh CS (1980) Hybrid modelling of soil ± structure interaction. Report of Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, report no. UCB/EERC-80/09
[16] Gomez-Masso A, Lysmer J, Chen J-C, Seed HB (1979) Soil structure interaction in different seismic environments. Report of Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, report no. UCB/EERC-79/18.
[17] Lysmer J, Udaka T, Tsai C, Seed HB (1975) Flush: a computer program for approximate 3D dynamic analysis of soil-structure problems. Report of Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, report no. EERC75-30.
[18] Gutierrez JA (1976) Substructure method for earthquake analysis of structure-soil interaction. Report of Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, report no. EERC 76-9.
[19] NIST GCR 12-917-21 (2012) Soil-structure interaction for building structures, U.S. Department of Commerce, Sept 2012.
[1] Okabe S., “General Theory of Earth Pressure,” Jour. of the Japanese Society of Civil Engrs, Tokyo, Japan (1926).
[2] Mononabe N. and Matsuo H., “On the Determination of Earth Pressure During Earthquakes,” Proc. of the World Eng. Conf., Vol. 9, p. 176 (1929).
[3] Reissner E. (1936): “Stationäre, axialsymmetrische, durch eine schüttelnde Masse erregte Schwingung eines homogenen elastischen Halbraum”, Ing.-Archiv, Vol. VII, Nr. 6, 381-396.
[4] Luco J. E. and Westman R. A.: 1971, “Dynamic Response of Circular Footings”, J. Eng. Mechanics Div. ASCE 97 (EM5), 1381–1395.
[5] Veletsos A.S. and Wei Y.T. (1971): “Lateral and Rocking Vibration of Footings”, J. Soil. Mech. Found. Div., ASCE, 97, 1227-1248.
[6] Kausel E., Whitman R.V., Morray J.P, and Elsabee, F. (1978). “The spring method for embedded foundations”, Nuclear Engineering and Design, 48, 377–392.
[7] Holler S. and Meskouris Konstantin (2006) “Granular material silos under dynamic excitation: Numerical simulation and experimental validation”, Journal of structural engineering ISSN: 0733-9445, Vol. 132, No.10, pp. 1573-1579.
[8] Li T., Zhang Z. and Shi L. (2009), "Influences of Pile-Soil-Structure Interaction on Seismic Response of Self Anchored Suspension Bridge", The Electronic Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, EJGE.
[9] Livaoğlu R, Doğangün A (2007). “Effects of foundation embedment on seismic behaviour of the elevated tanks considering fluid-structure-soil interaction”. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering. 27: 855–863.
[10] Nasreddin el Mezaini (2006), “Effects of Soil-Structure Interaction on the Analysis of Cylindrical Tanks”, Practical Periodical on Structural Design and Construction”, Volume 11, Issue 1, pp. 50-57.
[11] Mylonakis G, Gaazetas G (2000) Seismic soil-structure interaction: beneficial or detrimental. J Earthquake Eng 4(3):277–301.
[12] Wolf JP (1985) Dynamic soil ± structure interaction. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
[13] Wolf JP (1988) Soil ± structure interaction analysis in time domain. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs.
[14] Clough RW, Penzien J (1993) Dynamics of Structures, 2nd edn. McGraw-Hill, Tokyo.
[15] Gupta S, Lin TW, Penzien J, Yeh CS (1980) Hybrid modelling of soil ± structure interaction. Report of Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, report no. UCB/EERC-80/09
[16] Gomez-Masso A, Lysmer J, Chen J-C, Seed HB (1979) Soil structure interaction in different seismic environments. Report of Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, report no. UCB/EERC-79/18.
[17] Lysmer J, Udaka T, Tsai C, Seed HB (1975) Flush: a computer program for approximate 3D dynamic analysis of soil-structure problems. Report of Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, report no. EERC75-30.
[18] Gutierrez JA (1976) Substructure method for earthquake analysis of structure-soil interaction. Report of Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, report no. EERC 76-9.
[19] NIST GCR 12-917-21 (2012) Soil-structure interaction for building structures, U.S. Department of Commerce, Sept 2012.
@article{"International Journal of Architectural, Civil and Construction Sciences:72892", author = "Shreya Thusoo and Karan Modi and Ankit Kumar Jha and Rajesh Kumar", title = "Dynamic Soil Structure Interaction in Buildings", abstract = "Since the evolution of computational tools and simulation software, there has been considerable increase in research on Soil Structure Interaction (SSI) to decrease the computational time and increase accuracy in the results. To aid the designer with a proper understanding of the response of structure in different soil types, the presented paper compares the deformation, shear stress, acceleration and other parameters of multi-storey building for a specific input ground motion using Response-spectrum Analysis (RSA) method. The response of all the models of different heights have been compared in different soil types. Finite Element Simulation software, ANSYS, has been used for all the computational purposes. Overall, higher response is observed with SSI, while it increases with decreasing stiffness of soil.
", keywords = "Soil-structure interaction, response-spectrum analysis, finite element method, multi-storey buildings.", volume = "10", number = "5", pages = "617-6", }
