Dynamic Admission Control for Quality of Service in IP Networks
The goal of admission control is to support the Quality
of Service demands of real-time applications via resource reservation
in IP networks. In this paper we introduce a novel Dynamic
Admission Control (DAC) mechanism for IP networks. The DAC
dynamically allocates network resources using the previous network
pattern for each path and uses the dynamic admission algorithm to
improve bandwidth utilization using bandwidth brokers. We evaluate
the performance of the proposed mechanism through trace-driven
simulation experiments in view point of blocking probability,
throughput and normalized utilization.
[1] Elek, V., Karlsson, G. and Ronngren, R. (2000). Admission Control
Based on End-to-End Measurements. In: Proceedings of the INFOCOM
2000, 19th Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and
Communications Societies, Stockholm Sweden, 2:622-630.
[2] Samir, C., and Jongbok, B. (2002). Quest for the end-to-end network
QoS. Eighth Americas Conference on Information Systems, 1919-1925.
[3] Eleni, M., Charalampos, C., Panos, G., Danny, G. and Griffin, D. (2003).
Admission Control for Providing QoS in DiffServ IP Networks. The
TEQUILA Approach. IEEE Communications Magazine, 38-44.
[4] Mei, Y., Yan, H., Jaime, K., Meejeong, L. Tatsuya, S. and Matsubara, D.
(2004). An End-to-End QoS Framework with On-Demand Bandwidth
Reconfiguration. In: Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM, 0-7803-8356-
7/04.
[5] L. Mathy, C. Edwards and D. Hutchison, The Internet: A Global
Telecommunications Solution? IEEE Network Magazine, pp.46-57,
July/August 2000.
[6] M. Albrecht, M. Kster, (2003). End-to-end QoS Management for Delaysensitive
Scalable., The Proceedings of the 25 Annual Conf. on Local
Computer Networks (LCN-03), Tampa, FL.
[7] A.Terzis, .The role of BB in Traffic Engineering. Proc. of ICNP-99,
IEEE Computer Society. Sec 3.4.1.
[8] Z.-L.Zhang et al., On Scalable Design of Bandwidth Brokers, IEICE
Trans. Commun., Vol.E84-B, No.8, pp.2011-2025, August 2001.
[9] Rhee, W.S, Lee, J., Yang, M., Kim, S. (2003). "Admission control
mechanism using measurement based dynamic provisioning in
differentiated service network," IEEE ICCS2003, Singapore.
[10] Rhee, W., Kim, H., Park, K., Kim, K., and Kim, S. (2001). Two Phase
Edge-to-Edge Distributed Measurement Based Admission Control
Mechanism in Large IP Networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE
GLOBECOM 2001, 2571-2575.
[11] Zhiqun, Z., Xu, S., and Wei, D. (2004). MPLS ATCC. An Active Traffic
and Congestion Control Mechanism in MPLS. In: Proceedings of the
International Conferences on Infotech and Infonet (ICII2004, 5(3):234-
241.
[12] P. Bratley, B. Fox, and L. Schrage, A Guide to Simulation. New York:
Springer-Verlag, second ed., 1987.
[1] Elek, V., Karlsson, G. and Ronngren, R. (2000). Admission Control
Based on End-to-End Measurements. In: Proceedings of the INFOCOM
2000, 19th Annual Joint Conference of the IEEE Computer and
Communications Societies, Stockholm Sweden, 2:622-630.
[2] Samir, C., and Jongbok, B. (2002). Quest for the end-to-end network
QoS. Eighth Americas Conference on Information Systems, 1919-1925.
[3] Eleni, M., Charalampos, C., Panos, G., Danny, G. and Griffin, D. (2003).
Admission Control for Providing QoS in DiffServ IP Networks. The
TEQUILA Approach. IEEE Communications Magazine, 38-44.
[4] Mei, Y., Yan, H., Jaime, K., Meejeong, L. Tatsuya, S. and Matsubara, D.
(2004). An End-to-End QoS Framework with On-Demand Bandwidth
Reconfiguration. In: Proceedings of the IEEE INFOCOM, 0-7803-8356-
7/04.
[5] L. Mathy, C. Edwards and D. Hutchison, The Internet: A Global
Telecommunications Solution? IEEE Network Magazine, pp.46-57,
July/August 2000.
[6] M. Albrecht, M. Kster, (2003). End-to-end QoS Management for Delaysensitive
Scalable., The Proceedings of the 25 Annual Conf. on Local
Computer Networks (LCN-03), Tampa, FL.
[7] A.Terzis, .The role of BB in Traffic Engineering. Proc. of ICNP-99,
IEEE Computer Society. Sec 3.4.1.
[8] Z.-L.Zhang et al., On Scalable Design of Bandwidth Brokers, IEICE
Trans. Commun., Vol.E84-B, No.8, pp.2011-2025, August 2001.
[9] Rhee, W.S, Lee, J., Yang, M., Kim, S. (2003). "Admission control
mechanism using measurement based dynamic provisioning in
differentiated service network," IEEE ICCS2003, Singapore.
[10] Rhee, W., Kim, H., Park, K., Kim, K., and Kim, S. (2001). Two Phase
Edge-to-Edge Distributed Measurement Based Admission Control
Mechanism in Large IP Networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE
GLOBECOM 2001, 2571-2575.
[11] Zhiqun, Z., Xu, S., and Wei, D. (2004). MPLS ATCC. An Active Traffic
and Congestion Control Mechanism in MPLS. In: Proceedings of the
International Conferences on Infotech and Infonet (ICII2004, 5(3):234-
241.
[12] P. Bratley, B. Fox, and L. Schrage, A Guide to Simulation. New York:
Springer-Verlag, second ed., 1987.
@article{"International Journal of Information, Control and Computer Sciences:58104", author = "J. Kasigwa and V. Baryamureeba and D. Williams", title = "Dynamic Admission Control for Quality of Service in IP Networks", abstract = "The goal of admission control is to support the Quality
of Service demands of real-time applications via resource reservation
in IP networks. In this paper we introduce a novel Dynamic
Admission Control (DAC) mechanism for IP networks. The DAC
dynamically allocates network resources using the previous network
pattern for each path and uses the dynamic admission algorithm to
improve bandwidth utilization using bandwidth brokers. We evaluate
the performance of the proposed mechanism through trace-driven
simulation experiments in view point of blocking probability,
throughput and normalized utilization.", keywords = "Bandwidth broker, dynamic admission control(DAC), IP networks, quality of service, real-time flows.", volume = "1", number = "8", pages = "2526-5", }
