Design of QFT-Based Self-Tuning Deadbeat Controller

This paper presents a design method of self-tuning
Quantitative Feedback Theory (QFT) by using improved deadbeat
control algorithm. QFT is a technique to achieve robust control with
pre-defined specifications whereas deadbeat is an algorithm that
could bring the output to steady state with minimum step size.
Nevertheless, usually there are large peaks in the deadbeat response.
By integrating QFT specifications into deadbeat algorithm, the large
peaks could be tolerated. On the other hand, emerging QFT with
adaptive element will produce a robust controller with wider
coverage of uncertainty. By combining QFT-based deadbeat
algorithm and adaptive element, superior controller that is called selftuning
QFT-based deadbeat controller could be achieved. The output
response that is fast, robust and adaptive is expected. Using a grain
dryer plant model as a pilot case-study, the performance of the
proposed method has been evaluated and analyzed. Grain drying
process is very complex with highly nonlinear behaviour, long delay,
affected by environmental changes and affected by disturbances.
Performance comparisons have been performed between the
proposed self-tuning QFT-based deadbeat, standard QFT and
standard dead-beat controllers. The efficiency of the self-tuning QFTbased
dead-beat controller has been proven from the tests results in
terms of controller’s parameters are updated online, less percentage
of overshoot and settling time especially when there are variations in
the plant.

• H. Mansor
• S. B. Mohd Noor

• Deadbeat control
• quantitative feedback theory (QFT)
• robust control
• self-tuning control.

<p>[1] P. &ndash;O. Gutman, &ldquo;Robust and adaptive control: fidelity or an open
relationship,&rdquo; Systems &amp; Control Letters, vol. 49, pp. 9-19, 2003.
[2] K. K. Ahn and Q. T. Dinh, &ldquo;Self-tuning of Quantitative feedback theory
for force control of an electro-hydraulic test machine,&rdquo; Control
Engineering Practice, vol. 17, pp. 1291-1306, 2009.
[3] H. Mansor, S. B. M. Noor, R. K. R. Ahmad and F. S. Taip, &ldquo;Online
Quantitative Feedback Theory (QFT)-based self-tuning controller for
grain drying process,&rdquo; Scientific Research and Essays, vol.6 (30), pp.
6530-6534, 2011.
[4] P. J. Gawthrop, &ldquo;Quantitative feedback theory and self-tuning control,&rdquo;
The Proceedings of the International Conference on Control, pp. 616-
621, 1988.
[5] P. S. V. Nataraj and N. Kubal, &ldquo;Adaptive QFT control using hybrid
global optimisation and constraint propagation techniques,&rdquo; The
Proceedings of the 47th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control, pp.
1001-1005, 2008.
[6] D. Q. Truong, K. K Ahn, and J. I. Yoon, &ldquo;A study on a force control of
electric-hydraulic load simulator using online tuning quantitative
feedback theory,&rdquo; Proceedings of the International Conference on
Control, Automation and Systems, pp. 2622-2627, 2008.
[7] Barbargires, C. A. and Karybakas, C.A, &ldquo;Minimum-energy ripple-free
dead-beat control of type-I second-order plants,&rdquo; Proceedings of ICECS
&rsquo;99, The 6th IEEE International Conference on Electronics, Circuits and
Systems, vol. 2, pp. 1163-1166, 1999.
[8] H. Mansor, S. Khan and T.S. Gunawan, &ldquo;Modelling and control of
laboratory scale conveyor belt type grain dryer plant,&rdquo; Journal of Food,
Agriculture &amp; Environment, vol. 10(2), pp. 1384-1388, 2012.
[9] R. D. Whitfield, &ldquo;Control of a mixed-flow drier part 2: test of the control
algorithm,&rdquo; Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research, vol. 41(4),
pp. 289-299, 1988.
[10] C. Borghesani, Y. Chait and O. Yaniv, &ldquo;QFT frequency domain control
design toolbox: for use with Matlab&rdquo;: Terasoft, Inc., 1999.
[11] V. Bobal and P. Chalupa, &ldquo;Self-tuning controllers Simulink library,&rdquo;
Zlin: Thomas Bata University, 2008.</p>