Deorbiting Performance of Electrodynamic Tethers to Mitigate Space Debris

International guidelines recommend removing any
artificial body in Low Earth Orbit (LEO) within 25 years from
mission completion. Among disposal strategies, electrodynamic
tethers appear to be a promising option for LEO, thanks to the
limited storage mass and the minimum interface requirements to the
host spacecraft. In particular, recent technological advances make it
feasible to deorbit large objects with tether lengths of a few kilometers
or less. To further investigate such an innovative passive system,
the European Union is currently funding the project E.T.PACK
– Electrodynamic Tether Technology for Passive Consumable-less
Deorbit Kit in the framework of the H2020 Future Emerging
Technologies (FET) Open program. The project focuses on the design
of an end of life disposal kit for LEO satellites. This kit aims to
deploy a taped tether that can be activated at the spacecraft end of life
to perform autonomous deorbit within the international guidelines.
In this paper, the orbital performance of the E.T.PACK deorbiting
kit is compared to other disposal methods. Besides, the orbital decay
prediction is parametrized as a function of spacecraft mass and tether
system performance. Different values of length, width, and thickness
of the tether will be evaluated for various scenarios (i.e., different
initial orbital parameters). The results will be compared to other
end-of-life disposal methods with similar allocated resources. The
analysis of the more innovative system’s performance with the tape
coated with a thermionic material, which has a low work-function
(LWT), for which no active component for the cathode is required,
will also be briefly discussed. The results show that the electrodynamic tether option can be a
competitive and performant solution for satellite disposal compared
to other deorbit technologies.




References:
[1] D. J. Kessler and B. G. Cour-Palais, “Collision frequency of artificial
satellites: The creation of a debris belt,” Journal of Geophysical
Research: Space Physics, vol. 83, no. A6, pp. 2637–2646, 1978.
[2] M. Shan, J. Guo, and E. Gill, “Review and comparison of active
space debris capturing and removal methods,” Progress in Aerospace
Sciences, vol. 80, pp. 18–32, 2016.
[3] Active debris removal, https://www.esa.int/Safety Security/Space
Debris/Active debris removal, Last accessed on 2020-12-31.
[4] N. Adilov, P. J. Alexander, and B. M. Cunningham, “The
economics of orbital debris generation, accumulation, mitigation, and
remediation,” Journal of Space Safety Engineering, vol. 7, no. 3,
pp. 447–450, 2020.
[5] W. A. Hanson, “In their own words: Oneweb’s internet constellation
as described in their FCC Form 312 Application,” New Space, vol. 4,
no. 3, pp. 153–167, 2016.
[6] J. Alvarez and B. Walls, “Constellations, clusters, and communication
technology: Expanding small satellite access to space,” in 2016 IEEE
Aerospace Conference, IEEE, 2016, pp. 1–11.
[7] S. Kawamoto, T. Hirai, S. Kitajima, S. Abe, and T. Hanada,
“Evaluation of space debris mitigation measures using a debris
evolutionary model,” Transactions of the Japan Society for
Aeronautical and Space Sciences, Aerospace Technology Japan,
vol. 16, no. 7, pp. 599–603, 2018.
[8] SpaceFlightNow, https : / / spaceflightnow.com/2020/04/21/ spacexmodifies-
starlink-network-design-as- another-60- satellites- gear-upfor-
launch/, Last accessed on 2020-12-01.
[9] H. Stokes, Y. Akahoshi, C. Bonnal, et al., “Evolution of ISO’s space
debris mitigation standards,” Journal of Space Safety Engineering,
vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 325–331, 2020.
[10] A. G. Karacalioglu and J. Stupl, “ The Impact of New Trends in
Satellite Launches on the Orbital Debris Environment,” NASA, Tech.
Rep., 2016, online, at https : / / ntrs . nasa . gov / search . jsp ? R =
20160011184, Last accessed on 2020-12-01.
[11] V. L. Foreman, A. Siddiqi, and O. De Weck, “Large satellite
constellation orbital debris impacts: Case studies of oneweb and
spacex proposals,” in AIAA SPACE and Astronautics Forum and
Exposition, 2017, p. 5200.
[12] L. Olivieri and A. Francesconi, “Large constellations assessment and
optimization in LEO space debris environment,” Advances in Space
Research, vol. 65, no. 1, pp. 351–363, 2020.
[13] FET OPEN project, Electrodynamic Tether Technology for Passive
Consumable-less Deorbit Kit (E.T.PACK), Project no. 828902,
1/3/2019-31/5/2022, https://etpack.eu/, Last accessed on 2020-12-31.
[14] C. P. Mark and S. Kamath, “Review of active space debris removal
methods,” Space Policy, vol. 47, pp. 194–206, 2019.
[15] J. L. Rhatigan and W. Lan, “Drag-enhancing deorbit devices for
spacecraft self-disposal: A review of progress and opportunities,”
Journal of Space Safety Engineering, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 340–344, 2020.
[16] A. Black and D. A. Spencer, “Dragsail systems for satellite deorbit
and targeted reentry,” Journal of Space Safety Engineering, vol. 7,
no. 3, pp. 397–403, 2020.
[17] B. Cotton, I. Bennett, and R. Zee, “On-Orbit Results from the CanX-7
Drag Sail Deorbit Mission,” 2017.
[18] B. Taylor, C. Underwood, A. Viquerat, et al., “Flight Results of
the InflateSail Spacecraft and Future Applications of DragSails,” in
32nd Annual AIAA/USU Conference on Small Satellites, Logan, Utah,
2018.
[19] B. Smith, C. Capon, M. Brown, and R. Boyce, “Ionospheric drag for
accelerated deorbit from upper low earth orbit,” Acta Astronautica,
vol. 176, pp. 520–530, 2020.
[20] T. Sinn, L. Tiedemann, A. Riemer, et al., “ADEO passive de-orbit
subsystem activity leading to a dragsail demonstrator: conclusions
and next steps,” in Proceeding of 68th International Astronautical
Congress (IAC), Adelaide, Australia, 2017, pp. 25–29.
[21] E. K. Pfeiffer, T. Sinn, H. G. Hemme, et al., “ADEO - The European
Commercial Passive De-Orbit Subsystem Family Enabling Space
Debris Mitigation,” in 1st Aerospace Europe Conference (AEC) 2020,
Bordeaux, France, 2020.
[22] R. Ernst, T. Sinn, H. G. Hemme, et al., “For a cleaner space, the
de-orbiting approach of the PROBA P200 platform with the dragsail
subsystem ADEO 2,” in 1st Aerospace Europe Conference (AEC)
2020, Bordeaux, France, 2020.
[23] H. Hakima and M. R. Emami, “Assessment of active methods for
removal of LEO debris,” Acta Astronautica, vol. 144, pp. 225–243,
2018.
[24] M. Leomanni, G. Bianchini, A. Garulli, A. Giannitrapani, and
R. Quartullo, “Orbit Control Techniques for Space Debris Removal
Missions Using Electric Propulsion,” Journal of Guidance, Control,
and Dynamics, pp. 1–10, 2020.
[25] J. Sanmartin, M. Martinez-Sanchez, and E. Ahedo, “Bare wire anodes
for electrodynamic tethers,” Journal of Propulsion and Power, vol. 9,
no. 3, pp. 353–360, 1993.
[26] J. D. Williams, J. R. Sanmartin, and L. P. Rand, “Low work-function
coating for an entirely propellantless bare electrodynamic tether,”
IEEE Transactions on plasma science, vol. 40, no. 5, pp. 1441–1445,
2012.
[27] G. Sanchez-Arriaga and X. Chen, “Modeling and performance
of electrodynamic low-work-function tethers with photoemission
effects,” Journal of Propulsion and Power, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 213–220,
2018.
[28] G. Curzi, D. Modenini, and P. Tortora, “Large constellations of
small satellites: A survey of near future challenges and missions,”
Aerospace, vol. 7, no. 9, p. 133, 2020.
[29] A Technical Comparison of Three Low Earth Orbit Satellite
Constellation Systems to Provide Global Broadband, http : / /www.
mit.edu/∼portillo/files/Comparison-LEO-IAC-2018-slides.pdf, Last
accessed on 2020-12-31.
[30] SpaceX seeks permission for 4,425-satellite internet constellation,
https://www.spaceflightinsider.com/organizations/space-explorationtechnologies
/ spacex - seeks - permission - 4425 - satellite - internet -
constellation/, Last accessed on 2020-12-31.
[31] The Next Wave: Low Earth Orbit Constellations, http : / /
satellitemarkets . com / news - analysis / next - wave - low- earth - orbit -
constellations, Last accessed on 2020-12-31.
[32] News Analysis — Telesat’s deliberate pace to LEO broadband, https:
/ / spacenews.com/ news - analysis - telesats - deliberate - pace - to - leo -
broadband/, Last accessed on 2020-12-31.
[33] N. Satak, P. H. Laxminarayana, and P. D. Keskar, System and method
for integrated optimization of design and performance of satellite
constellations, International Publication Number: WO 2018/037424
Al, Aug. 2017. [Online]. Available: https : / / patentimages . storage .
googleapis.com/67/22/92/2d0b0d4eceb1aa/WO2018037424A1.pdf.
[34] EarthCARE (Earth Explorer 6), https://space.skyrocket.de/doc sdat/
earthcare.htm, Last accessed on 2020-12-31.
[35] G. S´anchez-Arriaga, C. Bombardelli, and X. Chen, “Impact of
nonideal effects on bare electrodynamic tether performance,” Journal
of Propulsion and Power, vol. 31, no. 3, pp. 951–955, 2015.
[36] MATLAB – MathWorks – MATLAB & Simulink, https : / / www.
mathworks.com/products/matlab.html, Last accessed on 2020-12-31.
[37] J. Picone, A. Hedin, D. P. Drob, and A. Aikin, “NRLMSISE-00 scientific issues,” Journal of Geophysical Research: Space Physics,
vol. 107, no. A12, SIA–15, 2002.
[38] D. Romagnoli and S. Theil, “De-orbiting satellites in leo using solar
sails,” Journal of Aerospace Engineering, vol. 4, no. 2, p. 49, 2012.
[39] L. DeLuca, F. Bernelli, F. Maggi, et al., “Active space debris
removal by a hybrid propulsion module,” Acta Astronautica, vol. 91,
pp. 20–33, 2013.
[40] M. Leomanni, A. Garulli, A. Giannitrapani, and F. Scortecci,
“Propulsion options for very low earth orbit microsatellites,” Acta
Astronautica, vol. 133, pp. 444–454, 2017.
[41] D. Bilitza and B. W. Reinisch, “International reference ionosphere
2007: Improvements and new parameters,” Advances in space
research, vol. 42, no. 4, pp. 599–609, 2008.
[42] M. Mandea, S. Macmillan, T. Bondar, et al., “International
geomagnetic reference field—2000,” Physics of the Earth and
planetary interiors, vol. 120, no. 1, pp. 39–42, 2000.
[43] G. S´anchez-Arriaga, S. Naghdi, K. W¨atzig, et al., “The ET PACK
project: Towards a fully passive and consumable-less deorbit kit based
on low-work-function tether technology,” Acta Astronautica, vol. 177,
pp. 821–827, 2020.
[44] L. Tarabini-Castellani, A. Ortega, A. Gimenez, et al., “Low
work-function tether Deorbit Kit,” Journal of Space Safety
Engineering, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 332–339, 2020.
[45] L. Tarabini-Castellani, A. Ortega, S. Garcia, et al., “Development
Roadmap of a Deorbit Kit Based on Electrodynamic Tether,” in
Proceeding of 71th International Astronautical Congress (IAC), The
CyberSpace Edition, 12-14 October 2020, 2020, p. 56 858.