Comparison of Finite Difference Schemes for Water Flow in Unsaturated Soils
Flow movement in unsaturated soil can be expressed
by a partial differential equation, named Richards equation. The
objective of this study is the finding of an appropriate implicit
numerical solution for head based Richards equation. Some of the
well known finite difference schemes (fully implicit, Crank Nicolson
and Runge-Kutta) have been utilized in this study. In addition, the
effects of different approximations of moisture capacity function,
convergence criteria and time stepping methods were evaluated. Two
different infiltration problems were solved to investigate the
performance of different schemes. These problems include of vertical
water flow in a wet and very dry soils. The numerical solutions of
two problems were compared using four evaluation criteria and the
results of comparisons showed that fully implicit scheme is better
than the other schemes. In addition, utilizing of standard chord slope
method for approximation of moisture capacity function, automatic
time stepping method and difference between two successive
iterations as convergence criterion in the fully implicit scheme can
lead to better and more reliable results for simulation of fluid
movement in different unsaturated soils.
[1] R. Haverkamp, M. Vauclin, J. Touma, P. J. Wierenga, and G. Vachaud,
"A comparison of numerical simulation models for one-dimensional
infiltration," Soil Soc. Am. J., vol. 41, pp. 285-293, 1977.
[2] M. A. Celia, B. T. Bouloutas, and R. L. Zarba, "A general mass
conservative solution for the unsaturated flow equation," Water Resour.
Res., vol. 26, pp. 1483-1496, 1990.
[3] K. Rathfelder, and L. M. Abriola, "Mass conservative numerical
solutions of the head based Richards equation," Water Resour. Res., vol.
30, pp. 2579-2586, 1994.
[4] P. S. Huyakorn, and T. D. Wadsworth, "FLAMINCO: a three
dimensional finite element code for analyzing water flow and solute
transport in saturated-unsaturated porous media," Geo. Trans. Inc.,
Herndon,VA, 1985.
[5] K. Huang, B. P. Mohanty, and M. T. Van Genuchten, "A new
convergence criterion for the modified Picard iteration method to solve
the variably saturated flow equation," Journal of Hydrology, vol. 78, pp.
69-91, 1996.
[6] S. O. Magnuson, R. G. Baca, and A. J. Sondrup, "Independent
verification and benchmark testing of the PORFLO-3 computer code,"
version 1.0, Idaho Natl. Lab., Idaho, Rep. EGG-BG-9175, 1990.
[7] A. I. El-Kadi, and G. Ling, "The Curant and Peclet number criteria for
the numerical solution of Richards equation," Water Resour. Res., vol.
29, pp. 3485-3494, 1994.
[8] M. Th. Van Genuchten, "A closed form equation for predicting the
hydraulic conductivity of saturated soils," Soil Soc. Am. J., vol. 44, pp.
892-898, 1980.
[1] R. Haverkamp, M. Vauclin, J. Touma, P. J. Wierenga, and G. Vachaud,
"A comparison of numerical simulation models for one-dimensional
infiltration," Soil Soc. Am. J., vol. 41, pp. 285-293, 1977.
[2] M. A. Celia, B. T. Bouloutas, and R. L. Zarba, "A general mass
conservative solution for the unsaturated flow equation," Water Resour.
Res., vol. 26, pp. 1483-1496, 1990.
[3] K. Rathfelder, and L. M. Abriola, "Mass conservative numerical
solutions of the head based Richards equation," Water Resour. Res., vol.
30, pp. 2579-2586, 1994.
[4] P. S. Huyakorn, and T. D. Wadsworth, "FLAMINCO: a three
dimensional finite element code for analyzing water flow and solute
transport in saturated-unsaturated porous media," Geo. Trans. Inc.,
Herndon,VA, 1985.
[5] K. Huang, B. P. Mohanty, and M. T. Van Genuchten, "A new
convergence criterion for the modified Picard iteration method to solve
the variably saturated flow equation," Journal of Hydrology, vol. 78, pp.
69-91, 1996.
[6] S. O. Magnuson, R. G. Baca, and A. J. Sondrup, "Independent
verification and benchmark testing of the PORFLO-3 computer code,"
version 1.0, Idaho Natl. Lab., Idaho, Rep. EGG-BG-9175, 1990.
[7] A. I. El-Kadi, and G. Ling, "The Curant and Peclet number criteria for
the numerical solution of Richards equation," Water Resour. Res., vol.
29, pp. 3485-3494, 1994.
[8] M. Th. Van Genuchten, "A closed form equation for predicting the
hydraulic conductivity of saturated soils," Soil Soc. Am. J., vol. 44, pp.
892-898, 1980.
@article{"International Journal of Engineering, Mathematical and Physical Sciences:56737", author = "H. Taheri Shahraiyni and B. Ataie Ashtiani", title = "Comparison of Finite Difference Schemes for Water Flow in Unsaturated Soils", abstract = "Flow movement in unsaturated soil can be expressed
by a partial differential equation, named Richards equation. The
objective of this study is the finding of an appropriate implicit
numerical solution for head based Richards equation. Some of the
well known finite difference schemes (fully implicit, Crank Nicolson
and Runge-Kutta) have been utilized in this study. In addition, the
effects of different approximations of moisture capacity function,
convergence criteria and time stepping methods were evaluated. Two
different infiltration problems were solved to investigate the
performance of different schemes. These problems include of vertical
water flow in a wet and very dry soils. The numerical solutions of
two problems were compared using four evaluation criteria and the
results of comparisons showed that fully implicit scheme is better
than the other schemes. In addition, utilizing of standard chord slope
method for approximation of moisture capacity function, automatic
time stepping method and difference between two successive
iterations as convergence criterion in the fully implicit scheme can
lead to better and more reliable results for simulation of fluid
movement in different unsaturated soils.", keywords = "Finite Difference methods, Richards equation, fullyimplicit, Crank-Nicolson, Runge-Kutta.", volume = "2", number = "4", pages = "251-5", }