Comparative Analysis of Mobility Support in Mobile IP and SIP
With the rapid usage of portable devices mobility in
IP networks becomes more important issue in the recent years. IETF
standardized Mobile IP that works in Network Layer, which involves
tunneling of IP packets from HA to Foreign Agent. Mobile IP suffers
many problems of Triangular Routing, conflict with private
addressing scheme, increase in load in HA, need of permanent home
IP address, tunneling itself, and so on. In this paper, we proposed
mobility management in Application Layer protocol SIP and show
some comparative analysis between Mobile IP and SIP in context of
mobility.
[1] C. Perkins, "IP mobility support," IETF RFC 2002, 1996.
[2] C. Perkins and D. Johnson, "Route optimization in mobile IP," Internet
Draft, Internet Engineering Task Force, Feb. 1999. Work in progress.
[3] H. Schulzrinne, S. Casner, R. Frederick, and V. Jacobson, "RTP: a
transport protocol for real-time applications," Request for Comments
(Proposed Standard) 1889, Internet Engineering Task Force, Jan. 1996.
[4] M. Handley, H. Schulzrinne, E. Schooler, and J. Rosenberg, "SIP:
session initiation protocol," Request for Comments (Proposed Standard)
3261, Internet Engineering Task Force, June, 2002.
[5] IP encapsulation within IP, C. Perkins, RFC 2003,
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2003.txt, October 1996.
[6] Generic Routing Encapsulation (GRE), D. Farinacci et al., RFC 2784,
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2784.txt, March 2000.
[7] Ferguson, P. & Senie, D., 2000, ÔÇÿNetwork Ingress Filtering: Defeating
Denial of Service Attacks which employ IP Source Address Spoofing-,
IETF RFC 2827.
[8] C. Perkins and Kuang-Yeh Wang, "Optimized Smooth Handoffs in
Mobile IP," Int-l. Symp. Comp. Commun, 1999.
[9] H. Schulzrinne and J. Rosenberg, "The session initiation protocol:
Providing advanced telephony services across the internet," Bell Labs
Technical Journal, vol. 3, pp. 144-160, October-December 1998.
[10] M. Handley and V. Jacobson, "SDP: session description protocol,"
Request for Comments (Proposed Standard) 2327, Internet Engineering
Task Force, Apr. 1998.
[11] S. Donovan and J. Rosenberg, "SIP session timer," Internet Draft,
Internet Engineering Task Force, July 2000.Work in progress.
[12] J.-O. Vatn and G. Q. M. Jr., "The effect of using co-located care-of
addresses onmacro handover latency," in Proc. of 14th Nordic Teletraffic
Seminar, (Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark),
Aug. 1998.
[13] Henning Schulzrinne & Elin Wedlund, "Application-Layer Mobility
Using SIP".
[1] C. Perkins, "IP mobility support," IETF RFC 2002, 1996.
[2] C. Perkins and D. Johnson, "Route optimization in mobile IP," Internet
Draft, Internet Engineering Task Force, Feb. 1999. Work in progress.
[3] H. Schulzrinne, S. Casner, R. Frederick, and V. Jacobson, "RTP: a
transport protocol for real-time applications," Request for Comments
(Proposed Standard) 1889, Internet Engineering Task Force, Jan. 1996.
[4] M. Handley, H. Schulzrinne, E. Schooler, and J. Rosenberg, "SIP:
session initiation protocol," Request for Comments (Proposed Standard)
3261, Internet Engineering Task Force, June, 2002.
[5] IP encapsulation within IP, C. Perkins, RFC 2003,
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2003.txt, October 1996.
[6] Generic Routing Encapsulation (GRE), D. Farinacci et al., RFC 2784,
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2784.txt, March 2000.
[7] Ferguson, P. & Senie, D., 2000, ÔÇÿNetwork Ingress Filtering: Defeating
Denial of Service Attacks which employ IP Source Address Spoofing-,
IETF RFC 2827.
[8] C. Perkins and Kuang-Yeh Wang, "Optimized Smooth Handoffs in
Mobile IP," Int-l. Symp. Comp. Commun, 1999.
[9] H. Schulzrinne and J. Rosenberg, "The session initiation protocol:
Providing advanced telephony services across the internet," Bell Labs
Technical Journal, vol. 3, pp. 144-160, October-December 1998.
[10] M. Handley and V. Jacobson, "SDP: session description protocol,"
Request for Comments (Proposed Standard) 2327, Internet Engineering
Task Force, Apr. 1998.
[11] S. Donovan and J. Rosenberg, "SIP session timer," Internet Draft,
Internet Engineering Task Force, July 2000.Work in progress.
[12] J.-O. Vatn and G. Q. M. Jr., "The effect of using co-located care-of
addresses onmacro handover latency," in Proc. of 14th Nordic Teletraffic
Seminar, (Technical University of Denmark, Lyngby, Denmark),
Aug. 1998.
[13] Henning Schulzrinne & Elin Wedlund, "Application-Layer Mobility
Using SIP".
@article{"International Journal of Information, Control and Computer Sciences:57811", author = "Hasanul Ferdaus and Sazzadur Rahman and Kamrul Islam", title = "Comparative Analysis of Mobility Support in Mobile IP and SIP", abstract = "With the rapid usage of portable devices mobility in
IP networks becomes more important issue in the recent years. IETF
standardized Mobile IP that works in Network Layer, which involves
tunneling of IP packets from HA to Foreign Agent. Mobile IP suffers
many problems of Triangular Routing, conflict with private
addressing scheme, increase in load in HA, need of permanent home
IP address, tunneling itself, and so on. In this paper, we proposed
mobility management in Application Layer protocol SIP and show
some comparative analysis between Mobile IP and SIP in context of
mobility.", keywords = "Mobility, mobile IP, SIP, tunneling.", volume = "1", number = "9", pages = "2751-5", }