Application of a Theoretical Framework as a Context for a Travel Behavior Change Policy Intervention

There has been a significant decline in active travel
and a massive increase in the use of car dependent travel in many
countries during the past two decades. Evidential risks for people’s
physical and mental health problems are correlated with this
increased use of motorized travel. These health related problems
range from overweight and obesity to increased air pollution. In
response to these rising concerns health professionals, traffic planers,
local authorities and others have introduced a variety of initiatives to
counterbalance the dominance of cars for daily journeys.
However, the nature of travel behavior change interventions,
which aim to reduce car use, are very complex and challenging
regarding their interactions with human behavior. To change travel
behavior at least two aspects have to be taken into consideration.
First, how to alter attitudes and perceptions toward the sustainable
and healthy modes of travel, in competition with experiences of
private car use. And second, how to make these behavior change
processes irreversible and sustainable. There are no comprehensive
models available to guide policy interventions to increase the level of
success of travel behavior change interventions across both these
dimensions.
A comprehensive theoretical framework is required in the effort to
optimize how to facilitate and guide the processes of data collection
and analysis to achieve the best possible guidelines for policy
makers. Regarding the gaps in the travel behavior change research
literature, this paper attempted to identify and suggest a
multidimensional framework in order to facilitate planning the
implemented travel behavior change interventions. A structured
mixed-method model is suggested to improve the analytic power of
the results according to the complexity of human behavior.
In order to recognize people’s attitudes towards a specific travel
mode, the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) was operationalized.
But in order to capture decision making processes the Transtheoretical
model of Behavior Change (TTM) was also used.
Consequently, the combination of these two theories (TTM and TPB)
has resulted in a synthesis with appropriate concepts to identify and
design an implemented travel behavior change interventions.

• F. Moghtaderi
• M. Burke
• J. Troelsen

• Behavior change theories
• Theoretical framework
• Travel behavior change interventions.

[1] Killoran, A., et al., Transport interventions promoting safe cycling and
walking: evidence briefing. 2006, National Institute for Health and
Clinical Excellence: London.
[2] Anable, J., ‘Complacent Car Addicts’ or ‘Aspiring Environmentalists’?
Identifying travel behaviour segments using attitude theory. Transport
Policy, 2005. 12(1): p. 65-78.
[3] Anderson, K.F. and P. Auspos, Community Change: Theories, Practice,
and Evidence, in Aspen Institute Roundtable on Community Change.
Community Change: Theories, Practice, and Evidence. 2006: The Aspen
Institute encourages.
[4] Seethaler, R. and G. Rose, Using the Six Principles of Persuasion to
Promote Travel Behaviour Change: Findings of a TravelSmart Pilot
Test. Road & Transport Research: A Journal of Australian and New
Zealand, 2006. 15: p. 94-106.
[5] Geller, E.S., Applied Behavior Analysis and Social Marketing: An
Integration for Environmental Preservation. Journal of Social Issues,
1989. 45(1): p. 17-36.
[6] Mikiki, F. and P. Papaioannou, A proposal for more efficient travel
behaviour change interventions, in Transport Research Arena (TRA).
2014: Ference, Paris.
[7] Andersen, L., et al., An intermittent running test to estimate maximal
oxygen uptake: the Andersen test. Journal of Sports Medicine and
Physical Fitness, 2008. 48: p. 434 - 437.
[8] Fyhri, A. and R. Hjorthol, Children’s independent mobility to school,
friends and leisure activities. Journal of Transport Geography, 2009.
17(5): p. 377-384.
[9] Garrard, J., Active Transport: Children and young people - an overview
of recent evidence. 2009, VicHealth: Melbourne.
[10] Moghtaderi, F., et al., Understanding Australian Parents’ Attitudes
About their Children’s Travel Behaviour: Results from the CATCH and
iMATCH projects, in State of Australian Cities Conference 2013, State
of Australian Cities Research Network: Sydney/ NSW.
[11] Naylor, P. and H. McKay, Prevention in the first place: schools a setting
for action on physical inactivity. British Journal of Sports Medicine,
2009. 43.
[12] Blair-Stevens, C., et al., Helpdesk Research Report: Literature and
debates around behaviour change. 2012: GSDRC.
[13] Ajzen, I., From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior, in
Action Control, J. Kuhl and J. Beckmann, Editors. 1985, Springer Berlin
Heidelberg. p. 11-39.
[14] 14. Ajzen, I., Perceived Behavioral Control, Self-Efficacy, Locus of
Control, and the Theory of Planned Behavior1. Journal of Applied
Social Psychology, 2002. 32(4): p. 665-683.
[15] Godin, G. and G. Kok, The Theory of Planned Behavior: A Review of
Its Applications to Health-related Behaviors. American Journal of
Health Promotion, 1996. 11(2): p. 87-98.
[16] CPRC. The transtheoretical model of behavior change. 2004 (cited 2013
July); Available from: www.cba.uri.edu/Scholl/Notes/TTM.html.
[17] Ajzen, I., Nature and Operation of Attitudes. Annual Review of
Psychology, 2001. 52: p. 27-58.
[18] 18. Lenio, J.A., Analysis of the Transtheoretical Model of Behavior
Change. UW-Stout Journal of Student Research, 2006: p. 73-86.
[19] Prochaska, J.O. and C. C.DiClemente, Stages and processes of selfchange
of smoking: Toward an integrative model of change,. Journal of
Consulting and Clinical Psychology,, 1983. 51: p. 390-395.
[20] Velicer, W.F., et al. Detailed Overview of the Transtheoretical Model.
1998; Available from:
http://www.uri.edu/research/cprc/transtheoretical.htm.
[21] Prochaska, J.O. and W.F. Velicer, The Transtheoretical Model of Health
Behavior Change. American Journal of Health Promotion, 1997. 12(1):
p. 38-48.
[22] Health Promotion Unit, Stages of behaviour change, in Queensland Stay
On Your Feet. 2007, Community Good Practice Toolkit. Division of
Chief Health Officer-Queensland Health.
[23] Marcus, B.H., et al., The stages and processes of exercise adoption and
maintenance in a worksite sample. Health Psychol, 1992. 11(6): p. 386-
95.
[24] Grizzell, J. Behavior Change Theories and Models. last web page
update: 2007; Available from: http://www.csupomona.edu/~jvgrizzell/
best_practices/bctheory.html.
[25] Ajzen, I., Behavioral interventions: Design and evaluation guided by the
theory of planned behavior.
[26] Ajzen, I. and M. Fishbein, Attitudes and the Attitude-Behavior Relation:
Reasoned and Automatic Processes. European Review of Social
Psychology, 2000. 11(1): p. 1-33.
[27] Ajzen, I. and S. Sheikh, Action versus inaction: anticipated affect in the
theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 2013.
43: p. 155–162.
[28] Ajzen, I., et al., Knowledge and the Prediction of Behavior: The Role of
Information Accuracy in the Theory of Planned Behavior. Basic and
Applied Social Psychology, 2011. 33(2): p. 101-117.
[29] Kitzinger, J., Qualitative Research: Introducing focus groups. BMJ,
1995. 311(7000): p. 299-302.
[30] Powell, R.A. and H.M. Single, Focus Groups. International Journal for
Quality in Health Care, 1996. 8(5): p. 499-504.