Analysis of the Learners’ Responses of the Adjusted Rorschach Comprehensive System: Critical Psychological Perspective

The study focused on the analysis of the Adjusted Rorschach Comprehensive System’s responses. The objective of this study is to analyse the participants’ response rate of the Adjusted Rorschach Comprehensive System with regards to critical psychology approach. The use of critical psychology theory in this study was crucial because it responds to the current inadequate western theory or practice in the field of psychology. The study adopted a qualitative approach and a case study design. The study was grounded on interpretivist paradigm. The sample size comprised six learners (three boys and three girls, aged of 14 years) from historically disadvantaged school in the Western Cape, South Africa. The Adjusted Rorschach Comprehensive System (ARCS) administration procedure, biographical information, semi-structured interviews, and observation were used to collect data. Data was analysed using thematic framework. The study found out that, factors that increased the response rates during the administration of ARCS were, language, seating arrangement, drawing, viewing, and describing. The study recommended that, psychological test designers take into consideration the philosophy or worldviews of the local people for whom the test is designed to minimize low response rates.

Authors:

• Mokgadi Moletsane-Kekae
• Robert Kananga Mukuna

Keywords:

• Adjusted Rorschach comprehensive system
• critical psychology
• learners
• responses.

References:

[1] F. A. Paniagua, Assessing and treating culturally diverse clients: a
practical guide, 2nd Ed. thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 1998.
[2] M. Moletsane-Kekae, The efficacy of the Rorschach among black
learners in South Africa. Doctoral Thesis, in educational Psychology at
the University of Pretoria, 2004.
[3] G.C.N. Hall and G.G. Maramba, in search of cultural diversity: Recent
literature in cross-cultural and ethnic minority psychology, Cultural
Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, vol. 7, pp. 12-26, 2001.
[4] W. J. Lonner, An overview of cross-cultural testing and assessment. In
R. W. Brislin (Ed.): Applied crass-cultural psychology (Cross-cultural
research and methodology series, vol. 14, pp. 56-76). Newbury Park,
CA: Sage, 1990.
[5] J. E. Exner, The Rorschach: A comprehensive system basic foundations
and principles of interpretation, 4th Ed. New York: Wiley, 2003.
[6] M. Aronstam, Rorschach self-interpretation: towards a culture-fair
understanding of Rorschach content data. South African Rorschach
Journal, vol. 1, no 1, pp. 33-46, 2004.
[7] D. Nightingale, and T. Neilands, (2001), Understanding and practicing
critical psychology, in Critical psychology: an Introduction, D. Fox, & I.
Prilleltensky, Eds. London: Sage, 2001, pp. 68-84.
[8] D. Hook, Critical psychology of the postcolonial: The mind of apartheid,
London & New York: Routledge, 2012.
[9] D. Fox, I. Prilleltensky, and S. Austin, (Eds.), Critical psychology: An
introduction, 2nd Ed. London: Sage, 2009.
[10] T.S. Sloan, Critical psychology: Voices for change. New York: St.
Martin’s Press, Inc, 2000.
[11] B. Nsamenang, “Critical psychology: a sub-Saharan African voice from
Cameroon”, in Critical Psychology, Voices for Change,T. Sloan,
Ed.New York: St. Martin’s Press, Inc, 2000, pp. 91-102.
[12] Hook, Governmentality and technologies of subjectivity, In Critical
psychology: introduction D. Hook, P. Kiguwa, & L. Mkhize, Eds. Cape
Town Lansdowne: UCT Press &Juta Academic, pp. 239-272, 2004.
[13] D.Hook, Restoring universality to the subject: Lacan’s Kantian logic of
sexuation’. Annual Review of Critical Psychology, 7, 151-167, 2009.
[14] D. Fox, I. Prilleltensky and S. Austin, (Eds.) Critical psychology: An
introduction, 2nd Ed. London: Sage, 2009.
[15] D. Painter, M. Terre Blanche, and J. Henderson, Critical psychology in
South Africa: Histories, themes and prospects'. Annual Review of
Critical Psychology, Vol. 5, pp. 212-235, 2006.
[16] N. Mkhize, Psychology: an African perspective, In Critical psychology,
D. Hook, Ed.Cape Town: UCT Press, 2004, pp.24-52.
[17] T. KaSigogo, and O. Tso Modipa, “Critical reflections on community
and psychology in South Africa”, in Critical psychology, R. Hook, Ed.
Cape Town Lansdowne: UCT Press & Juta Academic, 2004, pp. 316-
334.
[18] P. L. Munhall and R. J. Chenail, Qualitative research proposals and
reports: A guide, Boston, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning, 2008.
[19] J. Niewenhuis, Qualitative Research Designs and Data Gathering
Techniques, in First Steps in Research, K. Mare: Pretoria: Van Schaik
Publishers, pp. 69-97, 2007.
[20] L. Cohen, and L. Manion, “Research methods in Education”, London:
Routledge, 1994.
[21] V.S. Miranda, “The Supreme Court Carcieri v. Salazar Decision: A
Qualitative Analysis of How the Court’s Decision Negatively Affected
Native American Tribes Using Power Theory”, Proceedings of the
National Conference, On Undergraduate Research (NCUR), pp. 2101-
2107, 2011.
[22] R. K. Yin, R. K. (Ed.), Case study research: Design and methods (Vol.
5). Thousand Oaks CA: sage, 2003.
[23] C. De Wet, Victims of educator-targeted bullying: a qualitative study,
South African Journal of Education, Vol. 30, no 2, pp. 189-201, 2010.
[24] N. Burns and S. K. Grove, The practice of nursing research: Appraisal,
synthesis and generation of evidence, 6th Ed. St. Louis: Saunders, 2010.
[25] H. Rorschach, Psychodiagnostik. Methodik und Ergebnisse eines
wahrnehmungs diagnostischen Experiments (Deutenlassen von
Zufallsformen), Bern: Bircher, 1921.
[26] L. Blarter, C. Hughes and M. Tight, How to research, 4 th Ed.
Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill/Open University Press, 2010.
[27] P. J. Forrester, Log-Gases and Random Matrices (LMS-34), Princeton
University Press, 2010.
[28] G. E. Gorman and P. Clayton, Qualitative research for the information
professional: A practical handbook (2nd Ed.). London: Facet, 2005. [29] V.S. Miranda, The Supreme Court Carcieri v. Salazar Decision: A
Qualitative Analysis of How the Court’s Decision Negatively Affected
Native American Tribes Using Power Theory. Proceedings of the
National Conference, On Undergraduate Research (NCUR), pp. 2101-
2107, 2011.
[30] V. Braun and V. Clarke, Using thematic analysis in psychology,
Qualitative Research in Psychology, vol. 3, no 2, pp. 77-101, 2006.
[31] R. L. Miller and J. D. Brewer (Eds.), The AZ of social research: a
dictionary of key social science research concepts. London: Sage
Publication, 2003.
[32] M. Q. Patton, “Evaluation, knowledge management, best practices, and
high quality lessons learned”, The American Journal of Evaluation, vol.
22, no 3, pp. 329-336, 2001.
[33] I. B. Weiner, Rorschach Inkblot Method, In The use of psychological
testing for treatment planning and outcome evaluation,
[34] J.E. Exner and P. Erdberg, the Rorschach: A comprehensive system: vol.
2, interpretation, 3rd Ed. Oxford, England: Wiley, 2005.
[35] G. K. Huysamen, Fair and unbiased admission procedures for South
African institutions of higher education, South African Journal of
Higher Education, vol. 10, no 2, pp. 199–207, 1996.
[36] S. S. Kazarian and D. R. Evans, Cultural clinical psychology, Oxford
University Press, 1998.
[37] R. K. Mukuna, Administration of the Adjusted Rorschach
Comprehensive System to learners in a previously disadvantaged school
in the Western Cape, Unpublished Med Thesis, Faculty of Education,
University of the Western Cape, South Africa, 2014.