Alignment between Understanding and Assessment Practice among Secondary School Teachers

This study aimed to identify the alignment of
understanding and assessment practices among secondary school
teachers. The study was carried out using quantitative descriptive
study. The sample consisted of 164 teachers who taught Form 1 and 2
from 11 secondary schools in the district of North Kinta, Perak,
Malaysia. Data were obtained from 164 respondents who answered
Expectation Alignment Understanding and Practices of School
Assessment (PEKDAPS) questionnaire. The data were analysed
using SPSS 17.0+. The Cronbach’s alpha value obtained through
PEKDAPS questionnaire pilot study was 0.86. The results showed
that teachers' performance in PEKDAPS based on the mean value
was less than 3, which means that perfect alignment does not occur
between the understanding and practices of school assessment. Two
major PEKDAPS sub-constructs of articulation across grade and age
and usability of the system were higher than the moderate alignment
of the understanding and practices of school assessment (Min=2.0).
The content focused of PEKDAPs sub-constructs which showed
lower than the moderate alignment of the understanding and practices
of school assessment (Min=2.0). Another two PEKDAPS subconstructs
of transparency and fairness and the pedagogical
implications showed moderate alignment (2.0). The implications of
the study is that teachers need to fully understand the importance of
alignment among components of assessment, learning and teaching
and learning objectives as strategies to achieve quality assessment
process.





References:
[1] Baker, E. L., Freeman, M., & Clayton, S. (1991) Cognitive assessment
of history for large-scale testing. In M. C. Wittrock & E. L. Baker
(Eds.), Testing and cognition (pp. 131-153). Englewood Cliffs, NJ:
Prentice Hall.
[2] Biggs, J.B. (1996). Enhancing teaching through constructive alignment.
Higher Education, 32, 1-18.
[3] Cohen, S.A. (1987). 'Instructional alignment: Searching for a magic
bullet', Educational Researcher 16(8), 16--20.
[4] Faizah A Majid (2011) School-based Assessment in Malaysian Schools:
The Concerns of the English Teachers, Journal of US-China
Education Review, Vol.8, No.10.
[5] Grima. G (2003) School-Based Assessment: Implementation Issues and
Practices, Paper presented at the 21st Annual AEAA Conference:
Assessment and Certification in a Changing Educational, Economic &
Social Context Cape Town, South Africa.
[6] Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (2012), Kad Pelaporan Pelaksanaan
Pelan Induk Pembangunan Pendidikan 2006-2010, Retrieved from
http://www.moe.gov.my/?id=21&act=research&rid=3
[7] Kementerian Pendidikan Malaysia (2013) Portal Rasmi Kementerian
Pendidikan Malaysia, Retrieved from http://www.moe.gov.my/
[8] Lembaga Peperiksaan Malaysia (2012), Buku Panduan Pengurusan dan
Pengendalian Pentaksiran Berasaskan sekolah (PBS), Retrieved from
http://www.moe.gov.my/lp/index.php/component/content/article/53/216-
pentaksiran berasaskan-sekolah
[9] Moss, P. (2003). Reconceptualizing validity for classroom assessment.
Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 22(4), 13-25.
[10] Moss, P. (1992), ‘Shifting Conceptions of Validity in Educational
Measurement: Implications for performance assessment’, Review of
Educational Research, vol. 62, no. 3, pp. 229– 258.
[11] Newmann, F. M. (1993). Beyond common sense in educational
restructuring: The issues of content and linkage. Educational
Researcher, 22(2), pp. 4-13, 22
[12] Pentaksiran Berasaskan sekolah (PBS), Retrieved from
http://www.moe.gov.my/lp/index.php/component/content/article/53/216-
pentaksiran berasaskan-sekolah
[13] Spady, W. (1994). Outcomes-based education: critical Issues.
Arlington, VA: American Association of School Administrators.
[14] Ventura, F. and Murphy, R. (1998) The impact of measures to promote
equity in the secondary education certificate examinations in Malta: an
evaluation. Mediterranean Journal of Educational Studies, 3, 1.
[15] Webb, N. L. (1997). Criteria for alignment of expectations and
assessment in mathematics and science education. (Research
Monograph No. 6). Washington: National Institute for Science
Education Publications.