A Systemic Maturity Model

Maturity models, used descriptively to explain
changes in reality or normatively to guide managers to make
interventions to make organizations more effective and efficient, are
based on the principles of statistical quality control and PDCA
continuous improvement (Plan, Do, Check, Act). Some frameworks
developed over the concept of maturity models include COBIT,
CMM, and ITIL.
This paper presents some limitations of traditional maturity
models, most of them related to the mechanistic and reductionist
principles over which those models are built. As systems theory helps
the understanding of the dynamics of organizations and
organizational change, the development of a systemic maturity model
can help to overcome some of those limitations.
This document proposes a systemic maturity model, based on a
systemic conceptualization of organizations, focused on the study of
the functioning of the parties, the relationships among them, and their
behavior as a whole. The concept of maturity from the system theory
perspective is conceptually defined as an emergent property of the
organization, which arises as a result of the degree of alignment and
integration of their processes. This concept is operationalized through
a systemic function that measures the maturity of organizations, and
finally validated by the measuring of maturity in some organizations.
For its operationalization and validation, the model was applied to
measure the maturity of organizational Governance, Risk and
Compliance (GRC) processes.

• Emir H. Pernet
• Jeimy J. Cano

• GRC
• Maturity Model
• Systems Theory
• Viable System Model.

[1] Kohlegger, M., Maier, R., & Thalmann, S. (2009). Understanding
Maturity Models Results of a Structured Content Analysis. Proceedings
of I-KNOW´09 and I-SEMANTICS´09, (pp. 51-61). Graz, Austria.
[2] De Haes, S., & Van Grembergen, W. (2004). IT Governance and its
mechanisms. Information Systems Control Journal.
[3] IBM Corporation. (2007, October). The IBM Data Governance Council
Maturity Model: Building a roadmap for effective data governance. 6,7.
[4] SE-CMM®. (2003). Systems Security Engineering Capability Maturity
Model®. Model Description Document Version 3.0.
[5] Deming, E. (1997). Calidad, Productividad y Competitividad.
Barcelona: Dasantos.
[6] Bach, J. (1994, September). Satisfice INC. (American Programmer)
Retrieved August 4, 2008, from http://www.satisfice.com/articles/
cmm.shtml.
[7] Padma, P., Ganesh, L. S., & Rajendran, C. (2008). An Exploratory Study
of the Impact of the Capability Maturity Model on the Organization. (A.
Global, Ed.) The Quality Management Journal, 2(15), 20.
[8] IT Governance Institute. (2012). Cobit 5.0.
[9] Lankhorst, M. (2005). Enterprise architecture at work: Modelling,
communication, and analysis. Berlin: Springer.
[10] Pink Elephant. (2004). ITIL Process Maturity.
[11] Rogers, G. P. (2009). The role of maturity models in IT Governance: A
Comparison of the major models and their potential benefits to the
enterprise. In A. Cater-Steel, Information Technology Governance and
Service Management: Frameworks and Adaptations. Information
Science Reference.
[12] Shea, C. M., & Howell, J. M. (1998). Organizational Antecedents to the
Successful Implementation of Total Quality Management: A social
Cognitive Perspective. Journal of Quality Management, 3(1), 3.
[13] Thibodeau, P. (2007, November 19). Heft of New Tech-Buying
Guidelines May Prove Intimidating. (A. Global, Ed.) Computerworld,
47(41), 12.
[14] Kruger. (2001). Main schools of TQM: The big five. The TQM
Magazine, 13(3), 146-155.
[15] Cutting, T. (2006, February 6). Surviving Process without Going
Berserk. (A. Global, Ed.) Computerworld, 6(40), 34.
[16] Linberg, K. R. (1988). Modern approaches for understanding and
managing organizations. (A. R. Library, Ed.) Futurics, 3(4), 22.
[17] Flading, J. L. (2007, July). Certifications and the Contracting
Community. (A. Global, Ed.) Contract Management, 7(47), 18.
[18] IT NOW. (2005, September). Capability model mature - or is it?
[19] Adler, P. S. (2005, May). The Evolving Object of Software
Development. (A. Global, Ed.) Organization, 401
[20] Jackson, M. (1994, Julio-Diciembre). Más allá de las modas
administrativas: El pensamiento sistémico para los administradores.
Innovar, 6-21.
[21] Ackoff, R. L. (1992). Beyond Total Quality Management. (U. o. Hull,
Ed.) High Profile Lecture.
[22] Kantor, J. R. (1945). Psychology and Logic. Bloomington: Principia
Press.
[23] Flood, R. L., & Carson, E. R. (1993). Dealing with complexity: an
introduction to the theory and application of systems science (Second
Edition ed.). New York: Plenum Press.
[24] Hall, A. D., & Fagen, R. E. (1956). Definition of a System. In Y. o.
Theory, General Systems (pp. 1-10).
[25] Hatch, M. J. (1997). Organization Theory. Modern, Symbolic and
Postmodern Perspectives. Oxford University Press.
[26] Ansari, S. (2004). System Theory and Management Control.
[27] Checkland, P. (2005). Pensamiento de Sistemas. Práctica de Sistemas.
Limusa. Noriega Editores.
[28] Argyris, S. D. (1995). Organizational Learning II: Theoy, Method, and
Practice. Reading MA: Addison Wesley.
[29] Gregory, A. J. (2007). A systems approach to strategic management.
Proceedings of the 51st Annual Meeting of the ISSS-2007, Tokyo, Japan
(Vol. 51, No. 2). Tokyo, Japan.
[30] Espejo, R., & Harnden, R. (1989). The Viable Systems Model -
Interpretations and Applications of Stafford Beer´s VSM. Chichester:
1989.
[31] Van Gigh, J. P. (2006). Teoría General de Sistemas (Tercera Edición
ed.). México: Trillas.
[32] Kark, K., Othersen, M., & McClean, C. (2007, December 4). Defining
IT GRC. Forrester.
[33] COSO. (September 2004). Enterprise Risk Management - Integrated
Framework. Vancouver: PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.
[34] Baer, M. H. (September 2009). Governing Corporate Compliance.
Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1474291.
[35] Rodrigues, A. M., Stank, T. P., & Lynch, D. F. (2004). Linking Strategy,
Structure, Process and Performance in Integrated Logistics. Journal of
Business Logistics, 25(2), 65-94.
[36] Stank, T. P., Keller, S. B., & Closs, D. J. (2001). Performance Benefits
of Supply Chain Logistical Integration. Transportation Journal, 41(2/3),
32-46.
[37] Chen, H., Daugherty, P. J., & Roath, A. S. (2009). Defining and
Operationalizing Supply Chain Process Integration. Journal of Business
Logistics; 30, 1, 63.
[38] Lambert, D. M., García-Dastugue, S. J., & Croxton, K. L. (2005). An
Evaluation of Process-oriented Supply Chain Management Frameworks.
Journal of Business Logistics, 26(1), 25-51.
[39] Frohlich, M. T., & Westbrook, R. (2001). Arcs of Integration: an
International Study of Supply Chain Strategies. Journal of Operations
Management, 19(2), 185-200.
[40] Fenzl, N. (2003). Emergence and Self-Organization of Complex
Systems. The Role of Energy Flows and Information. Arshinov/Fuchs,
245-258.
[41] Fuenmayor, R. (2001). Interpretando Organizaciones. Una teoría
sistémico-interpretativa de las organizaciones. (U. d. Andes, Ed.)
[42] Miller, G. (1997). Introduction: context and method in qualitative
research. In g. Miller, & R. Dingwall, Context and method in qualitative
research (pp. 1-11). London: Sage.
[43] Beer, S. (1985). Diagnosing the System for Organizations. Chichester:
John Wiley & Sons.
[44] Hoverstadt, P. (2008). The Fractal Organization. The Atrium, Southern
Gate, Chichester, West Sussex, PO22 OLH, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
[45] Bonilla, G. (1988). Métodos Prácticos de Inferencia Estadística. El
Salvador: UCA Editores.
[46] Briones, G. (2011). Métodos y técnicas de investigación para las
ciencias sociales. Mexico: Trillas.