A Study of Feedback Strategy to Improve Inspector Performance by Using Computer Based Training

The purpose of this research was to study the inspector performance by using computer based training (CBT). Visual inspection task was printed circuit board (PCB) simulated on several types of defects. Subjects were 16 undergraduate randomly selected from King Mongkut-s University of Technology Thonburi and test for 20/20. Then, they were equally divided on performance into two groups (control and treatment groups) and were provided information before running the experiment. Only treatment group was provided feedback information after first experiment. Results revealed that treatment group was showed significantly difference at the level of 0.01. The treatment group showed high percentage on defects detected. Moreover, the attitude of inspectors on using the CBT to inspection was showed on good. These results have been showed that CBT could be used for training to improve inspector performance.





References:
[1] Micalizzi, J. and Goldberg, G., 1989. Knowledge of results in visual
inspection decisions: Sensitivity or criterion effect. International Journal
of Industrial Ergonomics, 4: 225-235.
[2] Drury, C.G., 1978. Integrating human factors in statistical quality
control. Human Factors, 20(5): 561-567.
[3] Chin, R.T., 1988. Automated visual inspection: 1981 to 1987. Computer
Vision, Graphics and Image Processing, 41: 346-381.
[4] Kartik Madhani, Mohammad T. Khaswneh, Sittichai Kaewkuekool,
Anand K. Gramopadhye, and Brain J. Melloy, 2002. Measurement of
human trust in a hybrid inspection for varying error patterns.
Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society 46th annual
meeting, PP.418-422.
[5] Harris, D. H., and Chaney, F.B., 1969. Human Factor in Quality
Assurance, Wiley, New York.
[6] Keawkuekool, Sittichai, 2003. Using alternative feedback strategies to
improve aircraft inspection performance. Ph.D. Thesis, Clemson
University, Clemson, SC, 237
[7] Parkes, K. R., and Rennocks, J., 1971. The effect of briefing on target
acquisition performance. Technical Report 260. Loughborough,
University of Technology, Loughborough, UK.
[8] Baker, C. A., 1960, Target recognition on complex displays Human
Factor, (2) 51-61.
[9] Gordon, S. E., 1994. Systematic Training Program Design: Maximizing
Effectiveness and Minimizing Liability. Prentice-Hall, Englewood
Cliffs, NJ.
[10] Gramopadhye, A. K., Drury, C. G., and Sharit, J., 1993. Training for
Decision-Making in Aircraft Inspection. Proceedings of the Human
Factors and Ergonomics Society 37th Annual Meeting. Seattle, WA, PP.
1267-1272.