A Study of Dose Distribution and Image Quality under an Automatic Tube Current Modulation (ATCM) System for a Toshiba Aquilion 64 CT Scanner Using a New Design of Phantom

Automatic tube current modulation (ATCM) systems are available for all CT manufacturers and are used for the majority of patients. Understanding how the systems work and their influence on patient dose and image quality is important for CT users, in order to gain the most effective use of the systems. In the present study, a new phantom was used for evaluating dose distribution and image quality under the ATCM operation for the Toshiba Aquilion 64 CT scanner using different ATCM options and a fixed mAs technique. A routine chest, abdomen and pelvis (CAP) protocol was selected for study and Gafchromic film was used to measure entrance surface dose (ESD), peripheral dose and central axis dose in the phantom. The results show the dose reductions achievable with various ATCM options, in relation with the target noise. The doses and image noise distribution were more uniform when the ATCM system was implemented compared with the fixed mAs technique. The lower limit set for the tube current will affect the modulations especially for the lower dose option. This limit prevented the tube current being reduced further and therefore the lower dose ATCM setting resembled a fixed mAs technique. Selection of a lower tube current limit is likely to reduce doses for smaller patients in scans of chest and neck regions.

• S. Sookpeng
• C. J. Martin
• D. J. Gentle

• Computed Tomography (CT)
• Automatic Tube Current Modulation (ATCM)
• Automatic Exposure Control (AEC).

[1] Kalra M, Maher M, Toth T, Kamath R, Halpern E, Saini S. Comparison
of Z-axis automatic tube current modulation technique with fixed tube
current CT scanning of abdomen and pelvis. Radiology 2004; 232(2):
347-53.
[2] Kalra M K, Maher M M, Toth T L, Schmidt B, Westerman B L, Morgan
H T, et al. Techniques and applications of automatic tube current
modulation for CT. Radiology 2004; 233(3): 649-57.
[3] Soderberg M, Gunnarsson M. Automatic exposure control in computed
tomography-an evaluation of systems from different manufacturers.
Acta Radiologica 2010; 6: 625-34.
[4] Kalender W A. Computed Tomography Fundamentals, System
Technology, Image Quality, Applications. 2nd ed. Erlangen: Publicis
Corporate Publishing; 2005.
[5] Peng Y, Li J, Ma D, Zhang Q, Liu Y, Zeng J, et al. Use of automatic
tube current modulation with a standardized noise index in young
children undergoing chest computed tomography scans with 64-slice
multidetector computed tomography. Acta Radiologica 2009; 50(10):
1175-81.
[6] Rizzo S, Kalra M, Schmidt B, Dalal T, Suess C, Flohr T, et al.
Comparison of angular and combined automatic tube current modulation
techniques with constant tube current CT of the abdomen and pelvis.
American Journal of Roentgenology 2006; 186(3): 673-9.
[7] Lee E J, Lee S K, Agid R, Howard P, Bae J M, terBrugge K.
Comparison of image quality and radiation dose between fixed tube
current and combined automatic tube current modulation in
craniocervical CT angiography. American Journal of Neuroradiology
2009; 30(9): 1754-9.
[8] Papadakis A E, Perisinakis K and Damilakis J. Automatic exposure
control in pediatric and adult multidetector CT examinations: a phantom
study on dose reduction and image quality. Medical Physics 2008; 35
4567-76.
[9] Lee S, Yoon SW, Yoo SM, Ji YG, Kim KA, Kim SH, Lee JT.
Comparison of image quality and radiation dose between fixed tube
current and combined automatic tube current modulation. Acta
Radiologica 2011; 52(10):1101-6.
[10] Martin C J, Gentle D J, Sookpeng S, Loveland J. Application of
Gafchromic film in the study of dosimetry methods in CT phantoms.
Journal of Radiological Protection 2011; 31(4): 389-409.
[11] Angel E. Sure Exposure: Low dose diagnostic image quality. Toshiba
America Medical Systems; 2009.
[12] Ferreira T, Rasband W. The ImageJ User Guide - Version 1.44.2011
(cited 2011 10 February); Available from:
http://imagej.nih.gov/ij/docs/user-guide.pdf.