A Spatial Repetitive Controller Applied to an Aeroelastic Model for Wind Turbines

This paper presents a nonlinear differential model,
for a three-bladed horizontal axis wind turbine (HAWT) suited
for control applications. It is based on a 8-dofs, lumped
parameters structural dynamics coupled with a quasi-steady sectional
aerodynamics. In particular, using the Euler-Lagrange Equation
(Energetic Variation approach), the authors derive, and successively
validate, such model. For the derivation of the aerodynamic model,
the Greenbergs theory, an extension of the theory proposed by
Theodorsen to the case of thin airfoils undergoing pulsating flows,
is used. Specifically, in this work, the authors restricted that theory
under the hypothesis of low perturbation reduced frequency k,
which causes the lift deficiency function C(k) to be real and equal
to 1. Furthermore, the expressions of the aerodynamic loads are
obtained using the quasi-steady strip theory (Hodges and Ormiston),
as a function of the chordwise and normal components of relative
velocity between flow and airfoil Ut, Up, their derivatives, and
section angular velocity ε˙. For the validation of the proposed model,
the authors carried out open and closed-loop simulations of a 5
MW HAWT, characterized by radius R =61.5 m and by mean chord
c = 3 m, with a nominal angular velocity Ωn = 1.266rad/sec.
The first analysis performed is the steady state solution, where
a uniform wind Vw = 11.4 m/s is considered and a collective
pitch angle θ = 0.88◦ is imposed. During this step, the authors
noticed that the proposed model is intrinsically periodic due to
the effect of the wind and of the gravitational force. In order
to reject this periodic trend in the model dynamics, the authors
propose a collective repetitive control algorithm coupled with a PD
controller. In particular, when the reference command to be tracked
and/or the disturbance to be rejected are periodic signals with a
fixed period, the repetitive control strategies can be applied due to
their high precision, simple implementation and little performance
dependency on system parameters. The functional scheme of a
repetitive controller is quite simple and, given a periodic reference
command, is composed of a control block Crc(s) usually added
to an existing feedback control system. The control block contains
and a free time-delay system eτs in a positive feedback loop, and a
low-pass filter q(s). It should be noticed that, while the time delay
term reduces the stability margin, on the other hand the low pass
filter is added to ensure stability. It is worth noting that, in this
work, the authors propose a phase shifting for the controller and
the delay system has been modified as e^(−(T−γk)), where T is the
period of the signal and γk is a phase shifting of k samples of the
same periodic signal. It should be noticed that, the phase shifting
technique is particularly useful in non-minimum phase systems, such
as flexible structures. In fact, using the phase shifting, the iterative
algorithm could reach the convergence also at high frequencies.
Notice that, in our case study, the shifting of k samples depends
both on the rotor angular velocity Ω and on the rotor azimuth
angle Ψ: we refer to this controller as a spatial repetitive controller.
The collective repetitive controller has also been coupled with a C(s) = PD(s), in order to dampen oscillations of the blades.
The performance of the spatial repetitive controller is compared
with an industrial PI controller. In particular, starting from wind
speed velocity Vw = 11.4 m/s the controller is asked to maintain the
nominal angular velocity Ωn = 1.266rad/s after an instantaneous
increase of wind speed (Vw = 15 m/s). Then, a purely periodic
external disturbance is introduced in order to stress the capabilities
of the repetitive controller. The results of the simulations show that,
contrary to a simple PI controller, the spatial repetitive-PD controller
has the capability to reject both external disturbances and periodic
trend in the model dynamics. Finally, the nominal value of the
angular velocity is reached, in accordance with results obtained with
commercial software for a turbine of the same type.

Authors:

• Riccardo Fratini
• Riccardo Santini
• Jacopo Serafini
• Massimo Gennaretti
• Stefano Panzieri

Keywords:

• Wind turbines
• aeroelasticity
• repetitive control
• periodic systems.

References:

[1] F. D. Bianchi, H. De Battista, and R. J. Mantz, Wind turbine control
systems: principles, modelling and gain scheduling design. Springer
Science & Business Media, 2006.
[2] J. Leishman, “Challenges in modeling the unsteady aerodynamics of
wind turbines,” 2002.
[3] M. Carrin, R. Steijl, M. Woodgate, G. Barakos, X. Munduate, and
S. Gomez-Iradi, “Aeroelastic analysis of wind turbines using a tightly
coupled cfd-csd method,” Journal of Fluids and Structures, vol. 50,
pp. 392–415, 2014.
[4] D. Yu and O. Kwon, “Predicting wind turbine blade loads and
aeroelastic response using a coupled cfd-csd method,” Renewable
Energy, vol. 70, pp. 184–196, 2014.
[5] M. Gennaretti and G. Bernardini, “Novel boundary integral formulation
for blade-vortex interaction aerodynamics of helicopter rotors,” AIAA
Journal, vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 1169–1176, 2007.
[6] L. Greco, R. Muscari, C. Testa, and A. Di Mascio, “Marine propellers
performance and flow-field prediction by a free-wake panel method,”
Journal of Hydrodynamics, vol. 26, no. 5, pp. 780–795, 2014.
[7] M. C. M. G. L. Calabretta, A and M. Gennaretti, “Assessment of a
comprehensive aeroelastic tool for horizontal-axis wind turbine rotor
analysis,” in press.
[8] C. Bottasso, A. Croce, B. Savini, W. Sirchi, and L. Trainelli,
“Aero-servo-elastic modeling and control of wind turbines using
finite-element multibody procedures,” Multibody System Dynamics,
vol. 16, no. 3, pp. 291–308, 2006.
[9] D. Schlipf, D. Schlipf, and M. Khn, “Nonlinear model predictive
control of wind turbines using lidar,” Wind Energy, vol. 16, no. 7,
pp. 1107–1129, 2013.
[10] J. Mullen and J. Hoagg, “Wind turbine torque control for unsteady
wind speeds using approximate-angular-acceleration feedback,” 2013.
[11] E. Bossanyi, P. Fleming, and A. Wright, “Field test results with
individual pitch control on the nrel cart3 wind turbine,” 2012.
[12] E. Bossanyi, “Individual blade pitch control for load reduction,” Wind
Energy, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 119–128, 2003.
[13] V. Rezaei and K. Johnson, “Robust fault tolerant pitch control of wind
turbines,” 2013.
[14] S. Gros, “An economic nmpc formulation for wind turbine control,”
2013.
[15] J. Friis, E. Nielsen, J. Bonding, F. Adegas, J. Stoustrup, and P. Odgaard,
“Repetitive model predictive approach to individual pitch control
of wind turbines,” in Decision and Control and European Control
Conference (CDC-ECC), 2011 50th IEEE Conference on, Dec 2011. [16] H. Hosseini and M. Kalantar, “Repetitive control scheme for an ecs to
improve power quality of grid connected wind farms using svm,” in
Smart Grids (ICSG), 2012 2nd Iranian Conference on, May 2012.
[17] I. Houtzager, J. W. van Wingerden, and M. Verhaegen, “Rejection of
periodic wind disturbances on a smart rotor test section using lifted
repetitive control,” IEEE Transactions on Control Systems Technology,
vol. 21, no. 2, pp. 347–359, March 2013.
[18] J. M. Greenberg, “Airfoil in sinusoidal motion in a pulsating stream,”
1947.
[19] T. Theodorsen, “General theory of aerodynamic instability and the
mechanism of flutter,” 1949.
[20] D. Hodges and R. ORMISTON, “Stability of elastic bending and
torsion of uniform cantilevered rotor blades in hover,” in 14th
Structures, Structural Dynamics, and Materials Conference, 1973, p.
405.
[21] D. A. Spera, “Wind turbine technology,” 1994.
[22] J. H. Laks, L. Y. Pao, and A. D. Wright, “Control of wind turbines: Past,
present, and future,” in American Control Conference, 2009. ACC’09.
IEEE, 2009, pp. 2096–2103.
[23] J. Ringwood and S. Simani, “Overview of modelling and control
strategies for wind turbines and wave energy devices: Comparisons
and contrasts,” Annual Reviews in Control, vol. 40, pp. 27–49, 2015.
[24] T. Y. Doh and J. Ryoo, “Robust repetitive controller design and
its application on the track-following control system in optical disk
drives,” in Decision and Control and European Control Conference
(CDC-ECC), 2011 50th IEEE Conference on, Dec 2011.
[25] L. Cuiyan, Z. Dongchun, and Z. Xianyi, “Theory and applications of
the repetitive control,” in SICE 2004 Annual Conference, vol. 1, 2004.
[26] S. Hara, Y. Yamamoto, T. Omata, and M. Nakano, “Repetitive control
system: a new type servo system for periodic exogenous signals,” IEEE
Transactions on Automatic Control, vol. 33, no. 7, pp. 659–668, Jul
1988.
[27] M. Poloni and G. Ulivi, “Iterative trajectory tracking for flexible arms
with approximate models,” in Advanced Robotics, 1991. ’Robots in
Unstructured Environments’, 91 ICAR., Fifth International Conference
on, June 1991.
[28] A. Carozzi, A. Fioretti, M. Poloni, F. Nicolo, and G. Ulivi,
“Implementation of a tracking learning controller for an industrial
manipulator,” in Control Applications, 1993., Second IEEE Conference
on, Sep 1993.
[29] S. Panzieri and G. Ulivi, “Disturbance rejection of iterative learning
control applied to trajectory tracking for a flexible manipulator,” in
European Control Conf. (ECC 1995), Roma, Italy, September 1995.
[30] P. Lucibello, S. Panzieri, and F. Pascucci, “Suboptimal output
regulation of robotic manipulators by iterative learning,” in 11th Int.
Conf. on Advanced Robotics, 2003, iLC.
[31] Y.-H. Yang and C.-L. Chen, “Spatially periodic disturbance rejection
using spatial-based output feedback adaptive backstepping repetitive
control,” 2008.
[32] C.-L. Chen, G.-C. Chiu, and J. Allebach, “Robust spatial-sampling
controller design for banding reduction in electrophotographic process,”
Journal of Imaging Science and Technology, vol. 50, no. 6, pp.
530–536, 2006.
[33] B. Mahawan and Z.-H. Luo, “Repetitive control of tracking systems
with time-varying periodic references,” International Journal of
Control, vol. 73, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2000.
[34] M. Nakano, J.-H. She, Y. Mastuo, and T. Hino, “Elimination
of position-dependent disturbances in constant-speed-rotation control
systems,” Control Engineering Practice, vol. 4, no. 9, pp. 1241–1248,
1996.
[35] J. M. Jonkman and M. L. Buhl Jr, “Fast users guide,” National
Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, CO, Technical Report No.
NREL/EL-500-38230, 2005.