A Robotic “Puppet Master” Application to ASD Therapeutic Support

This paper describes a preliminary work aimed at
setting a therapeutic support for autistic teenagers using three
humanoid robots NAO shared by ASD (Autism Spectrum Disorder)
subjects. The studied population had attended successfully a first
year program, and were observed with a second year program
using the robots. This paper focuses on the content and the effects
of the second year program. The approach is based on a master
puppet concept: the subjects program the robots, and use them as
an extension for communication. Twenty sessions were organized,
alternating ten preparatory sessions and ten robotics programming
sessions. During the preparatory sessions, the subjects write a story
to be played by the robots. During the robot programming sessions,
the subjects program the motions to be realized to make the robot
tell the story. The program was concluded by a public performance.
The experiment involves five ASD teenagers aged 12-15, who had
all attended the first year robotics training. As a result, a progress
in voluntary and organized communication skills of the five subjects
was observed, leading to improvements in social organization,
focus, voluntary communication, programming, reading and writing
abilities. The changes observed in the subjects general behavior
took place in a short time, and could be observed from one robotics
session to the next one. The approach allowed the subjects to
draw the limits of their body with respect to the environment, and
therefore helped them confronting the world with less anxiety.

Authors:

• Sophie Sakka
• Rénald Gaboriau

Keywords:

• Autism spectrum disorder
• robot
• therapeutic support
• rob’autism.

References:

[1] Jill Boucher, Vicky Lewis, and Glyn Collis. Familiar face and voice
matching and recognition in children with autism. Journal of Child
Psychology and Psychiatry and Allied Disciplines, 39(2), 1998.
[2] John-John Cabibihan, Hifza Javed, Marcelo Ang Jr., and
Sharifah Mariam Aljunied. Why robots? a survey on the roles
and benefits of social robots in the therapy of children with autism.
International Journal of Social Robotics, 5(4), 2013.
[3] Kerstin Dautenhahn. I could be you: The phenomenological dimension
of social understanding. Journal of Cybernetics & Systems, 1997.
[4] Kerstin Dautenhahn. Robots as social actors: Aurora and the case of
autism. In Third International Cognitive Technology Conference, 1999.
[5] Geraldine Dawson and Larry Galpert. Current Issues in Autism, chapter
12- A Developmental Model for Facilitating the Social Behavior of
Autistic Children, pages 237–261. Springer, 1986.
[6] Paul Dickerson, Ben Robins, and Kerstin Dautenhahn. Where the
action is: A conversation analytic perspective on interaction between a
humanoid robot, a co-present adult and a child with an asd. Interaction
Studies, 14(2), 2013.
[7] David Feil-Seifer, Matt Black, MJ Mataric, and Shrikanth Narayanan.
Designing interactive technologies for supporting research in autism
spectrum disorders. In USC Interaction Lab Technical Report
CRES-09-001, 2009.
[8] David Feil-Seifer and Maja J Mataric. Using robots to augment (not
replace) people in therapeutic settings. In Robotics Science and Systems
Workshop on Human-Robot Interaction: Perspectives and Contributions
to Robotics from the Human Sciences, 2011.
[9] Deborah G. Garfin and Catherine Lord. Current Issues in Autism, chapter
7- Communication as a Social Problem in Autism, pages 133–151.
Springer, 1986.
[10] Jacques Lacan. Autres E´crits. Seuil, 2001.
[11] D. J. Ricks and M. B Colton. Trends and considerations in robot-assisted
autism therapy. In IEEE International Conference on Robotics and
Automation (ICRA), 2010.
[12] Ben Robins, Kerstin Dautenhahn, and Janek Dubowski. Does appearance
matter in the interaction of children with autism with a humanoid robot?
Interaction Studies, 7(3), 2006.
[13] Ben Robins, Paul Dickerson, Penny Stribling, and Kerstin Dautenhahn.
Robot-mediated joint attention in children with autism: A case study in
robot-human interaction. Interaction studies, 2004.
[14] Sophie Sakka, R´enald Gaboriau, Jean Picard, Edwina Redois, Gwena¨elle
Parchantour, Laura Sarfaty, Sonia Navarro, and Annie Barreau.
Rob’autism: how to change autistic social skills in 20 weeks. In 5th
International Workshop on Medical and Service Robots, 2016.
[15] Brian Scassellati. How social robots will help us to diagnose, treat, and
understand autism. In International Symposium of Robotics Research,
2005.
[16] Shamsuddin Syamimi, Yussof Hanafiah, Ismail Luthffi, Hanapiah
Fazah Akhtar, Mohamed Salina, Ali Piah Hanizah, and Zahari
Nur Ismarrubie. Initial response of autistic children in human-robot
interaction therapy with humanoid robot nao. In International
Colloquium on Signal Processing and its Applications, 2012.
[17] Adriana Tapus, Andreea Peca, Amir Aly, Cristina Pop, Lavinia Jisa,
Sebastian Pintea, Alina S. Rusu, and Daniel O. David. Children with
autism social engagement in interaction with nao, an imitative robot: A
series of single case experiments. Interaction Studies, 13(2), 2012.
[18] Iain Werry and Kerstin Dautenhahn. Applying mobile robot technology
to the rehabilitation of autistic children. In International Symposium on
Intelligent Robotic Systems, 1999.
[19] Iain Werry and Kerstin Dautenhahn. Modeling Biology: Structures,
Behaviors, Evolution – Vienna Series in Theoretical Biology, chapter
Human-Robot Interaction as a Model for Autism Therapy: An
Experimental Study with Children with Autism, pages 283–299. 2007.