A Proposal of Community based Facility Management Performance (CbFM) in the Education System of Batubara District in Indonesia

The primary education system in Indonesia involved the community recognized as the school committee, to take a part in the process of achieving the quality of education via the school facility performance, the low level of school committee involvement in the education system has become the issue in the development of education and reflected to the quality of education. This paper will discuss the conceptual framework and methodology for the performance of school committees within the management of school facilities in Batubara district of Indonesia. The concepts of Community based Facility Management (CbFM) and Logometrix are used as a basis to measure the school committee performance in order to address the needs of quality school management. The data will be taken from questionnaires distributed for those who work and use school facilities spread over seven sub district of Batubara, Indonesia. The result of this study is expected to provide a guide for evaluating the performance of existing school committee in improving the quality of education in Indonesia.





References:
[1] http://go.worldbank.org/VUK7DZAN10
[2] Suparlan, (2005). Komite Sekolah: Penerbit Pustaka Yogyakarta.
[3] Alexander, K. and Brown, M. (2006). "Community-based facility
management", Facilities, Vol.24, No.7/8, 2006 pp.250-268
[4] Alexander, K. (1996), Facilities Management: Theory and Practice, E.
and F.N. Spon, London
[5] United States Department of Education. (1999). Impact of inadequate
school facilities on student learning. Washington, DC: Author
[6] Earthman, G. I. (2002). School facility conditions and student academic
achievement. Posted at the scholarship repository, University of
California. retrieved form http://repositories.cdlib.org
[7] Morris Jr., R. (2003). The relationships among school facility
characteristics, student achievement, and job satisfaction levels among
teachers. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Georgia,
Athens
[8] Earthman, G. (2004). Prioritization of 31 criteria for school building
adequacy. Baltimore, MD: American Civil Liberties Union Foundation
of Maryland.
[9] Lemasters, L.K. (1997). A synthesis of studies pertaining to facilities,
student achievement, and student behavior. Unpublished doctoral
dissertation. (ED447687). Blacksburg, VA. Virginia Polytechnic and
State University.
[10] Baum, S. Howell. (2004)."How communities can use research to hold
school system accountable", The Urban Review, Vol. 36, No.1, March
2004 pp. 37-59
[11] Leung, Mei-Yung; Lu Xinhong. and Ip, Hon-yan (2005), Investigating
key components of the facility management of secondary schools in
Hong Kong. Facilities , vol. 23 No.5/6 (p.226-238)
[12] Abdul Hakim Muhammad, M. S. (2005). Pengurusan Fasiliti. UTM:
Penerbit Universiti Teknologi Malaysia
[13] Joseph, D.C. and J.C. Michael. (2001). Time saver standards for
building types. New York: McGraw-Hill.
[14] Uline, (1997)
[15] Edwards, C.H. (2000), Classroom Discipline and Management, 3rd ed.,
Wiley, New York, NY.
[16] Lackney, J.A (1999 January 28) Reading a school building like a book:
the influence of the physical setting on learning and literacy. Paper
presented at the program for Research and Evaluation of Public Schools
(PREPS) Conference, Jackson, Mississipi.
[17] Brackertz, N. (2005). A framework for the strategic management of
facilities, balancing physical and financial considerations with service,
customer, utilisation and environmental requirements.
[18] Nutt, B. (2000). Four competing futures for Facility Management.
Facilities, Vol.18 No. 3/4, pp. 124-132
[19] Senter, G.W. and Charles, C.M. (2002), Elementary Classroom
Management, 3rd ed., Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MA.
[20] Direktorat Jenderal Manajemen Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah
(2007): Modul Pemberdayaan Komite Sekolah