A Comparison Study of Inspector's Performance between Regular and Complex Tasks

This research was to study a comparison of inspector-s performance between regular and complex visual inspection task. Visual task was simulated on DVD read control circuit. Inspection task was performed by using computer. Subjects were 10 undergraduate randomly selected and test for 20/20. Then, subjects were divided into two groups, five for regular inspection (control group) and five for complex inspection (treatment group) tasks. Result was showed that performance on regular and complex inspectors was significantly difference at the level of 0.05. Inspector performance on regular inspection was showed high percentage on defects detected by using equal time to complex inspection. This would be indicated that inspector performance was affected by visual inspection task.





References:
[1] Kartik Madhani, Mohammad T. Khaswneh, Sittichai Kaewkuekool,
Anand K. Gramopadhye, and Brain J. Melloy, 2002. Measurement of
human trust in a hybrid inspection for varying error patterns.
Proceedings of the human factors and ergonomics society 46th annual
meeting, PP.418-422.
[2] Harris, D. H., and Chaney, F.B., 1969. Human Factor in Quality
Assurance, Wiley, New York.
[3] Keawkuekool, Sittichai, 2003. Using alternative feedback strategies to
improve aircraft inspection performance. Ph.D. Thesis, Clemson
University, Clemson, SC, 237
[4] Parkes, K. R., and Rennocks, J., 1971. The effect of briefing on target
acquisition performance. Technical Report 260. Loughborough,
University of Technology, Loughborough, UK.
[5] Gordon, S. E., 1994. Systematic Training Program Design: Maximizing
Effectiveness and Minimizing Liability. Prentice-Hall, Englewood
Cliffs, NJ.