A Case Study on Barriers in Total Productive Maintenance Implementation in the Abu Dhabi Power Industry

Maintenance has evolved into an imperative function, and contributes significantly to efficient and effective equipment performance. Total Productive Maintenance (TPM) is an ideal approach to support the development and implementation of operation performance improvement. It systematically aims to understand the function of equipment, the service quality relationship with equipment and the probable critical equipment failure conditions. Implementation of TPM programmes need strategic planning and there has been little research applied in this area within Middle-East power plants. In the power sector of Abu Dhabi, technologically and strategically, the power industry is extremely important, and it thus needs effective and efficient equipment management support. The aim of this paper is to investigate barriers to successful TPM implementation in the Abu Dhabi power industry. The study has been conducted in the context of a leading power company in the UAE. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 16 employees, including maintenance and operation staff, and senior managers. The findings of this research identified seven key barriers, thus: managerial; organisational; cultural; financial; educational; communications; and auditing. With respect to the understanding of these barriers and obstacles in TPM implementation, the findings can contribute towards improved equipment operations and maintenance in power organisations.





References:
[1] T. Reiman, and P. Oedewald, "Measuring maintenance culture and maintenance core task with CULTURE-questionnaire––A case study in the power industry," Safety Science, vol. 42, pp. 859-889, 2004.
[2] H. Yamashina, "Japanese manufacturing strategy and the role of total productive maintenance," Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, vol. 1, pp. 27-38, 1995.
[3] I. P. S. Ahuja, and J. S. Khamba, "Total productive maintenance: literature review and directions," International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, vol. 25, pp. 709-756, 2008.
[4] P. Willmott, and D. McCarthy, TPM: A Route to World Class Performance. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2001.
[5] F. Lee Cooke, "Implementing TPM in plant maintenance: some organisational barriers," International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management, vol. 17, pp. 1003-1016, 2000.
[6] A. Gosavi, "A risk-sensitive approach to total productive maintenance," Automatica, vol. 42, pp. 1321-1330, 2006.
[7] G. Waeyenbergh, and L. Pintelon, "A framework for maintenance concept development," International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 77, pp. 299-313, 2002.
[8] T. Wireman, Total Productive Maintenance: An American Approach. New York: Industrial Press, 1990.
[9] C. J. Bamber, J. M. Sharp, and M. T. Hides, "Factors affecting successful implementation of total productive maintenance: A UK manufacturing case study perspective," Journal of Quality in Maintenance Engineering, vol. 5, pp. 162-181, 1999.
[10] A. Bryman, and E. Bell, Business Research Methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.
[11] K. C. Ng, G. G. G. Goh, and U. C. Eze, "Barriers in total productive maintenance implementation in a semiconductor manufacturing firm: A case study". 2012 IEEE International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Engineering, pp. 377 – 381.
[12] H. H. Tamar, and A. M. J. Ayham, "The Applicability of Total Productive Maintenance for Healthcare facilities: an Implementation Methodology," International Journal of Business, Humanities and Technology, vol. 2, pp. 148-155, 2012.
[13] M. N. Marshall, "Sampling for qualitative research," Family Practice, vol. 13, pp. 522-525, 1996.
[14] M. Firlej, and D. Hellens, Knowledge Elicitation: A Practical Handbook. Prentice Hall UK, 1991.
[15] G. H. Hofstede, and G. J. Hofstede, Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. UK: McGraw-Hill, 2005.