The System for Root Canal Length Measurement Based on Multifrequency Impedance Method

Electronic apex locators (EAL) has been widely used
clinically for measuring root canal working length with high accuracy,
which is crucial for successful endodontic treatment. In order to
maintain high accuracy in different measurement environments,
this study presented a system for root canal length measurement
based on multifrequency impedance method. This measuring system
can generate a sweep current with frequencies from 100 Hz to
1 MHz through a direct digital synthesizer. Multiple impedance
ratios with different combinations of frequencies were obtained
and transmitted by an analog-to-digital converter and several of
them with representatives will be selected after data process. The
system analyzed the functional relationship between these impedance
ratios and the distance between the file and the apex with statistics
by measuring plenty of teeth. The position of the apical foramen
can be determined by the statistical model using these impedance
ratios. The experimental results revealed that the accuracy of
the system based on multifrequency impedance ratios method to
determine the position of the apical foramen was higher than the
dual-frequency impedance ratio method. Besides that, for more
complex measurement environments, the performance of the system
was more stable.

Authors:

• Zheng Zhang
• Xin Chen
• Guoqing Ding

Keywords:

• Root canal length
• apex locator
• multifrequency impedance
• sweep frequency.

References:

[1] M. H. Nekoofar, M. M. Ghandi, S. J. Hayes, and P. M. Dummer,
“The fundamental operating principles of electronic root canal length
measurement devices,” Int Endod J, vol. 39, no. 8, pp. 595–609, 2006.
[2] M. Gordon and N. Chandler, “Electronic apex locators,” International
endodontic journal, vol. 37, no. 7, pp. 425–437, 2004.
[3] A. Katz, A. Tamse, and A. Y. Kaufman, “Tooth length determination: a
review,” Oral surgery, oral medicine, oral pathology, vol. 72, no. 2, pp.
238–242, 1991.
[4] N. McDonald and E. J. Hovland, “An evaluation of the apex locator
endocater,” Journal of endodontics, vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 5–8, 1990.
[5] V. S. Cox, C. E. Brown, S. L. Bricker, and C. W. Newton, “Radiographic
interpretation of endodontic file length,” Oral Surgery, Oral Medicine,
Oral Pathology, vol. 72, no. 3, pp. 340–344, 1991.
[6] A. F. Fouad and L. C. Reid, “Effect of using electronic apex locators
on selected endodontic treatment parameters,” J Endod, vol. 26, no. 6,
pp. 364–7, 2000.
[7] I. Sunada, “New method for measuring the length of the root canal,”
Journal of Dental Research, vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 375–387, 1962.
[8] M. Kosaka, M. Nemoto, Y. Kawaguchi, and H. Horiuchi, “Electrical
characteristics of apparatus to determine the working length of the root
canal, japan,” J. Conserv. Dent, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 599–607, 1979.
[9] J. Ushiyama, “New principle and method for measuring the root canal
length,” Journal of Endodontics, vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 97–104, 1983.
[10] C. Kobayashi, “Electronic canal length measurement,” Oral Surgery,
Oral Medicine, Oral Pathology, Oral Radiology and Endodontics,
vol. 79, no. 2, pp. 226–231, 1995.
[11] C. Kobayashi and H. Suda, “New electronic canal measuring device
based on the ratio method,” Journal of endodontics, vol. 20, no. 3, pp.
111–114, 1994.
[12] H. Ounsi and A. Naaman, “In vitro evaluation of the reliability of
the root zx electronic apex locator,” International endodontic journal,
vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 120–123, 1999.
[13] P. White, B. Austin, H. Walia, and V. Dhuru, “Comparison of accuracy
of four apex locators,” J Endod, vol. 22, p. 216, 1996.
[14] R. J. Czerw, M. S. Fulkerson, J. C. Donnelly, and J. O. Walmann, “In
vitro evaluation of the accuracy of several electronic apex locators,”
Journal of endodontics, vol. 21, no. 11, pp. 572–575, 1995.
[15] R. Ali, N. C. Okechukwu, P. Brunton, and B. Nattress, “An overview of
electronic apex locators: part 2,” Br Dent J, vol. 214, no. 5, pp. 227–31,
2013.
[16] E. K. Stober, F. Duran-Sindreu, M. Mercade, J. Vera, R. Bueno, and
M. Roig, “An evaluation of root zx and ipex apex locators: an in vivo
study,” J Endod, vol. 37, no. 5, pp. 608–10, 2011. [Online]. Available:
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21496657
[17] A. R. Welk, J. C. Baumgartner, and J. G. Marshall, “An in vivo
comparison of two frequency-based electronic apex locators,” Journal
of Endodontics, vol. 29, no. 8, pp. 497–500, 2003.
[18] I. Guyon and A. Elisseeff, “An introduction to variable and feature
selection,” Journal of machine learning research, vol. 3, no. Mar, pp.
1157–1182, 2003.
[19] J. N. Martins, D. Marques, A. Mata, and J. Carames, “Clinical efficacy
of electronic apex locators: systematic review,” J Endod, vol. 40, no. 6,
pp. 759–77, 2014.
[20] B. C. Vasconcelos, M. Bueno Mde, S. M. Luna-Cruz, M. A. Duarte,
and C. A. Fernandes, “Accuracy of five electronic foramen locators with
different operating systems: an ex vivo study,” J Appl Oral Sci, vol. 21,
no. 2, pp. 132–7, 2013.
[21] S. Nawab, M. J. A. RANA, and A. YAR, “Comparative evaluation of
working length with digital radiography and third generation electronic
apex locator,” Pakistan Oral & Dental Journal, vol. 36, no. 2, 2016.