The Influence of Forest Management Histories on Dead Wood and Habitat Trees in the Old Growth Forest in Northern Iran

Dead wood and habitat tree such as fallen logs, snags,
stumps and cracks and loos bark etc. are regarded as an important
ecological component of forests on which many forest dwelling
species depend on presence of them within forest ecosystems.
Meanwhile its relation to management history in Caspian forest has
gone unreported. The aim of research was to compare the amounts of
dead wood and habitat trees in the forests with historically different
intensities of management, including: forests with the long term
implication of management (PS), the short term implication of
management (NS) which were compared with semi virgin forest
(GS). The number of 405 individual dead and habitat trees were
recorded and measured at 109 sampling locations. ANOVA revealed
volume of dead tree in the form and decay classes significantly differ
within sites and dead volume in the semi virgin forest significantly
higher than managed sites. Comparing the amount of dead and
habitat tree in three sites showed that, dead tree volume related with
management history and significantly differ in three study sites.
Meanwhile, frequency of habitat trees was significantly different
within sites. The highest amount of habitat trees including cavities,
cracks and loose bark and fork split trees was recorded in virgin site
and lowest recorded in the sites with the long term implication of
management. It can be concluded that forest management cause
reduction of the amount of dead and habitat tree specially in a large
size, thus managing this forest according to ecological sustainable
principles require a commitment to maintaining stand structure that
allow, continued generation of dead trees in a full range of size.

• Kiomars Sefidi

• Cracks trees
• forest biodiversity
• fork split trees
• nature conservation
• sustainable management.

[1] M. E. Harmon, J. F. Franklin, F. J. Swanson, P. Sollins, S. V. Gregory, J.
D. Lattin, N. H. Anderson, S. P. Cline, N. G. Aumen, J. R. Sedell, G. W.
Lienkaemper, K. Cromack, and K. W. Cummins. Ecology of Coarse
Woody Debris in Temperate Ecosystems. Advances in Ecological
Research, 154, 1986, pp133-302.
[2] D. Kraus, F. Krumm, Integrative Approaches as an Opportunity for the
Conservation of Forest Biodiversity. European Forest Institute, 2013,
284 pp.
[3] T. Ranus, and O. Kindvall. Extinction Risk of Wood-Living Model
Species in Forest Landscapes as Related to Forest History and
Conservation Strategy. Landscape Ecology, vol 21, 2006, pp 687-698.
[4] M. Christensen, Hahn K., E. P. Mountford, P. Ódor, T. Standovár, D.
Rozenbergar, J. Diaci, S. Wijdeven, P. Meyer, S. Winter, and T. Vrska.
Dead Wood in European Beech (Fagus sylvatica) Forest Reserves.
Forest Ecology and Management, vol 210, 2005, pp 267-282.
[5] A. H. Colak. Dead Wood and Its Role in Nature Conservation and
Forestry: A Turkish Perspective. J Pract Ecol Conserv, 5 (1), 2002, pp
37-49.
[6] B Norden, F Gotmark, M Tonnberg, M Ryberg. Dead Wood in Semi-
Natural Temperate Broadleaved Woodland: Contribution of Coarse and
Fine Dead Wood, Attached Dead Wood and Stumps. For Ecol Manag,
vol 194, no (1-3), 2004, pp 235-248.
[7] K. Hahn, M Christensen. Dead Wood in European Forest Reserves-A
Reference for Forest Management. EFI Proceedings 51, 2004, pp 181-
191.
[8] MM Rahman, G Frank, H Ruprecht and H Vacik. Structure of Coarse
Woody Debris in Lange-Leitn Natural Forest Reserve, Austria. J. For.
Sci. Vol 54, No 4, 2008, pp 161-169. [9] R Butler, R Schlapfer. Dead Wood in Managed Forests: How much is
Enough? Schweizerische Zeitschrift für Forstwesen vol 155, no 2, 2004,
pp 31-37.
[10] Kh Sagheb-Talebi, T Sajedi, M Pourhashemi. Forest of Iran, A Treasure
from the Past, a Hope for the Future, Springer verlage, 2014, 145p.
[11] Y Resaneh., M.H. Moshtagh, P Salehi. Quantitative and Qualitative
Study of North Forests. In: Nation Seminar of Management and
Sustainable Development of North Forests, August 2000. Ramsar, Forest
and Range Organization Press, 2001, pp 55–79.
[12] P Svoboda. Forest Tree Species and Their Stands. Prague, SZN, 1953,
110 p.
[13] K Nosrati, MR Marvie-Mohadjer, Bode W, Knapp HD. Schutz der
Biologischen Vielfalt und integriertes Management der Kaspischen
Wälder (Nordiran). Bundesamt für Naturschutz, Bonn. 2005.
[14] M L Dewan, J Famouri. Soil Map of Iran. Food and Agriculture
Organization of the United Nations.1961.
[15] K. Sefidi, Marvie-Mohadjer M. R., Mosandl R. and C. A. Copenheaver.
Canopy Gaps and Regeneration in Old-Growth Oriental Beech (Fagus
orientalis Lipsky) Stands, Northern Iran. Forest Ecology and
Management, Vol 262, No 2, 2011, pp 1094-1099.
[16] K Sefidi, M R Marvie-Mohadjer, R Mosandl, CA Copenheaver. Coarse
and Fine Woody Debris in Mature Oriental Beech (Fagus orientalis
Lipsky) Forests of Northern Iran.Nat Areas J, Vol 33, No 3, 2013, pp
248-255.
[17] S. U. Müller and N. Bartsch. Decay Dynamic of Coarse and Fine Woody
Debris of a Beech (Fagus sylvatica L.) Forest in Central Germany,
European Journal of Forest Research, Vol 128, 2009, pp 287–296.
[18] L. Albrecht. Grundlagen, Ziele und Methodik der Waldökologischen
Forschung in Naturwaldreservaten.Bayerisches Staatsministerium für
Ernährung, Landwirtschaft und Forsten, Müchen. 1990.
[19] M. Zobeiri. Forest Stands and Tree Measurements. University of Tehran
Prees. 2008.450p.
[20] ME Harmon, J. Sexton. Guidelines for Measurements of Woody
Detritus in Forest Ecosystems. US LTER Publication no. 20, US LTER
Network Office. University of Washington, Seattle, WA. .1996.
[21] J. H. Zar. Biostatistical Analysis. Upper Saddle River Prentice-Hall.
1999.