The Excess Loop Delay Calibration in a Bandpass Continuous-Time Delta Sigma Modulators Based on Q-Enhanced LC Filter

The Q-enhanced LC filters are the most used
architecture in the Bandpass (BP) Continuous-Time (CT)
Delta-Sigma (ΣΔ) modulators, due to their: high frequencies
operation, high linearity than the active filters and a high quality
factor obtained by Q-enhanced technique. This technique consists
of the use of a negative resistance that compensate the ohmic
losses in the on-chip inductor. However, this technique introduces a
zero in the filter transfer function which will affect the modulator
performances in term of Dynamic Range (DR), stability and in-band
noise (Signal-to-Noise Ratio (SNR)). In this paper, we study the
effect of this zero and we demonstrate that a calibration of the
excess loop delay (ELD) is required to ensure the best performances
of the modulator. System level simulations are done for a 2ndorder
BP CT (ΣΔ) modulator at a center frequency of 300MHz. Simulation
results indicate that the optimal ELD should be reduced by 13% to
achieve the maximum SNR and DR compared to the ideal LC-based
ΣΔ modulator.

Authors:



References:
[1] S. Gupta, D. Gangopadhyay, H. Lakdawala, J. C. Rudell, and D. J. Allstot,
“A 0.8-2 GHz fully-integrated QPLL-timed direct-RF-sampling bandpass
ΣΔ ADC in 0.13 μm CMOS,” IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits,
vol. 47, no. 5, pp. 1141–1153, May 2012.
[2] G. Molina-Salgado, A. Morgado, G. J. Dolecek, and J. M. de la Rosa,
“LC-based bandpass continuous-time sigma-delta modulators with widely
tunable notch frequency,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems I:
Regular Papers, vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 1442–1455, May 2014.
[3] J. Lota and A. Demosthenous, “Q-enhancement with on-chip inductor
optimization for reconfigurable ΔΣ radio-frequency ADC,” in 2015 IEEE
13th International New Circuits and Systems Conference (NEWCAS),
June 2015, pp. 1–4.
[4] G. M. Salgado, G. J. Dolecek, and J. M. de la Rosa, “On the use of
passive circuits to implement LC-based band-pass CT ΣΔ modulators,”
in 2015 IEEE 58th International Midwest Symposium on Circuits and
Systems (MWSCAS), Aug 2015, pp. 1–4.
[5] J. A. Cherry and W. M. Snelgrove, “Excess loop delay in continuous-time
delta-sigma modulators,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems II:
Analog and Digital Signal Processing, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 376–389, Apr
1999.
[6] S. Loeda, H. M. Reekie, and B. Mulgrew, “On the design of
high-performance wide-band continuous-time sigma-delta converters
using numerical optimization,” IEEE Transactions on Circuits and
Systems I: Regular Papers, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 802–810, April 2006.
[7] C.-Y. Cai, Y. Jiang, S.-W. Sin, S.-P. U, and R. P. Martins,
“Excess-loop-delay compensation technique for CT ΣΔ modulator with
hybrid active–passive loop-filters,” Analog Integrated Circuits and Signal
Processing, vol. 76, no. 1, pp. 35–46, Jul 2013. (Online). Available:
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10470-013-0069-z
[8] A. Yahia, P. Benabes, and R. Kielbasa, “The influence of the feedback
DAC delay in continuous-time bandpass DS converters,” May 2001, pp.
716–719.
[9] A. Ashry and H. Aboushady, “Using excess loop delay to simplify
LC-based ΣΔ modulators,” Electronics Letters, vol. 45, no. 25, pp.
1298–1299, December 2009.