Study on the Effect of Pre-Operative Patient Education on Post-Operative Outcomes

Patient satisfaction represents a crucial aspect in the evaluation of health care services. Preoperative teaching provides the patient with pertinent information concerning the surgical process and the intended surgical procedure as well as anticipated patient behavior (anxiety, fear), expected sensation, and the probable outcomes. Although patient education is part of Accreditation protocols, it is not uniform at most places. The aim of this study was to try to assess the benefit of preoperative patient education on selected post-operative outcome parameters; mainly, post-operative pain scores, requirement of additional analgesia, return to activity of daily living and overall patient satisfaction, and try to standardize few education protocols. Dependent variables were measured before and after the treatment on a study population of 302 volunteers. Educational intervention was provided by the Investigator in the preoperative period to the study group through personal counseling. An information booklet contained detailed information was also provided. Statistical Analysis was done using Chi square test, Mann Whitney u test and Fischer Exact Test on a total of 302 subjects. P value <0.05 was considered as level of statistical significance and p<0.01 was considered as highly significant. This study suggested that patients who are given a structured, individualized and elaborate preoperative education and counseling have a better ability to cope up with postoperative pain in the immediate post-operative period. However, there was not much difference when the patients have had almost complete recovery. There was no difference in the requirement of additional analgesia among the two groups. There is a positive effect of preoperative counseling on expected return to the activities of daily living and normal work schedule. However, no effect was observed on the activities in the immediate post-operative period. There is no difference in the overall satisfaction score among the two groups of patients. Thus this study concludes that there is a positive benefit as suggested by the results for pre-operative patient education. Although the difference in various parameters studied might not be significant over a long term basis, they definitely point towards the benefits of preoperative patient education. 




References:
[1] Costa MJ. The lived perioperative experience of ambulatory surgery
patients. AORN J. 2001;74(6): 874-881.
[2] Bernier MJ, Sanares DC, Owen SV, Newhouse PL. Preoperative
teaching received and valued in a day surgery setting. AORN J.
2003;77(3):563-582.
[3] Devine, E. (1985). Recommended Elements of Surgical Patient
Education Based on Current Research. In Surgical Patient Educa.ion
Does Make a Difference.American Hospital Association, Chicago, 1985.
pp21-25.
[4] Kernaghan, S.G. (1985). Preadmission preoperative teaching: a
promising option, but easier said than done. Promoting Health,Mar-Apr
85.
[5] Merritt, S.L. (1989). Patient self-efficacy: a framework for designing
patient education. Focus on Critical Care, j6(i), 68-73.
[6] Johnson, Shirley (1988). Preoperative teaching: a need for change.
Nursing Management, 20(2), 80B-80H.
[7] Worley, Beth (1986). Pre-admission testing and teaching: more
satisfaction at less cost. Nursing knaoeegen , 17(12), 32-33.
[8] Divine, E.C., & Cook, T.D. (1986). Clinical and cost relevant effects of
psycho-educational interventions with surgical patients: a meta-analysis.
Research in Nursing and Health, 9(), 89-105.
[9] Cook, Thomas D. (1985). Major research analysis provides proof:
patient education does make a difference. In Surgical Patient Education
Does Make a Difference. American Hospital Association,Chicago, 1985.
pp 18-20.
[10] Johnson, J.E., Christman, N.J., and Stitt, C. (1985).Personal control
Interventions: short- and long-term effects on surgical patients. Research
In Nursing and health, a, 131-145.
[11] Rothrock, Jane C. (1989). Peri-operative nursing research. American
Operating Room Nurse Journal,A2(2), 597-619.
[12] Brumfield VC, Kee CC, Johnson JY. Preoperative patient teaching in
ambulatory surgery settings. AORN J. 1996;64(6):941-952.
[13] Mordiffi,S.Z., Tan, S.P. and Wong M.K. 2003. Information provided to
surgical patients versus information needed. AORN Online. 77(3):546-
549, 552-554, 556-558, 561-562.
[14] Forster, A., Smith, J., Young, J., Knapp, P., House, A. and Wright, J.
2002. Information provision for stroke patients and their caregivers.
Cochrane Review. In: The Cochrane Library.Issue 3, Oxford: Update
Software.
[15] Guruge, S. and Sidani S. 2002. Effects of demographic characteristics on
preoperative teaching outcomes: A meta-analysis. Canadian Journal of
NursingResearch. 34(4):25-33.
[16] 16.Polit DF, Beck CT (2004) Nursing Research: Principles and
Methods. 7th edn. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, PA,
USA.
[17] Campbell MJ, Julious SA, Altman DG (1995) Estimating sample sizes
for binary, ordered categorial, and continuous outcomes in two group
comparisons.BMJ311(7013): 1145–8
[18] Santavirta N, Lillqvist G, Sarvimäki A, Honkanen V, Konttinen YT,
Santavirta S (1994) Teaching of patients undergoing total hip
replacement surgery. Int JNurs Stud 31(2): 135–42
[19] Bartlett, E.E. (1986).Historical glimpses of patient education In the
United States. Patient Education and Counselling, 2(2), 135-149.
[20] Knoerl DV, Faut-Callahan M, Paice J, Shott (1999) Preoperative PCA
teaching program to manage postoperative pain. MedsurgNurs8(1): 25–
33, 36
[21] Lorig K (2001) Patient Education: A Practical Approach. 3rdedn. Sage
Publications Inc, California.
[22] Chumbley GM, Ward L, Hall GM, Salmon P (2004) Pre-operative
information and patient controlled analgesia: much ado about nothing.
Anaesthesia59(4): 354–8
[23] Giraudet-Le Quintrec, J., Coste, J., Vastel, L., Pacault, V., Jeanne, L.,
Lamas, J., Kerboull, L.,Fougeray, M., Conseiller, C., Kahan, A.
&Courpied, J. (2003) Positive effect of patient education for hip surgery:
a randomized trial.ClinicalOrthopaedics andRelated Research, 414,
112-20.