Study of Human Upper Arm Girth during Elbow Isokinetic Contractions Based on a Smart Circumferential Measuring System

As one of the convenient and noninvasive sensing approaches, the automatic limb girth measurement has been applied to detect intention behind human motion from muscle deformation. The sensing validity has been elaborated by preliminary researches but still need more fundamental studies, especially on kinetic contraction modes. Based on the novel fabric strain sensors, a soft and smart limb girth measurement system was developed by the authors’ group, which can measure the limb girth in-motion. Experiments were carried out on elbow isometric flexion and elbow isokinetic flexion (biceps’ isokinetic contractions) of 90°/s, 60°/s, and 120°/s for 10 subjects (2 canoeists and 8 ordinary people). After removal of natural circumferential increments due to elbow position, the joint torque is found not uniformly sensitive to the limb circumferential strains, but declining as elbow joint angle rises, regardless of the angular speed. Moreover, the maximum joint torque was found as an exponential function of the joint’s angular speed. This research highly contributes to the application of the automatic limb girth measuring during kinetic contractions, and it is useful to predict the contraction level of voluntary skeletal muscles.




References:
[1] Nawab, S. H., S. S. Chang, and C. J. De Luca, High-yield decomposition
of surface EMG signals. Clin Neurophysiol, 2010. 121(10): p. 1602-15.
[2] Liu, P., et al., Influence of joint angle on EMG-torque model during
constant-posture, quasi-constant-torque contractions. J Electromyogr
Kinesiol, 2013. 23(5): p. 1020-8.
[3] Guo, J. Y., et al., Continuous monitoring of electromyography (EMG),
mechanomyography (MMG), sonomyography (SMG) and torque output
during ramp and step isometric contractions. Med Eng Phys, 2010. 32(9):
p. 1032-42.
[4] Shi, J., et al., Continuous monitoring of sonomyography,
electromyography and torque generated by normal upper arm muscles
during isometric contraction: Sonomyography assessment for arm
muscles. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, 2008. 55(3): p.
1191-1198.
[5] Yasojima, T., et al., Differences in EMG activity in scapular plane
abduction under variable arm positions and loading conditions. Med Sci
Sports Exerc, 2008. 40(4): p. 716-21.
[6] Garner, B. A. and M. G. Pandy, Estimation of Musculotendon Properties
in the Human Upper Limb. Annals of Biomedical Engineering, 2003.
31(2): p. 207-220.
[7] Clancy, E. A., et al., Identification of constant-posture EMG-torque
relationship about the elbow using nonlinear dynamic models. IEEE
Trans Biomed Eng, 2012. 59(1): p. 205-12.
[8] Sartori, M., et al., EMG-driven forward-dynamic estimation of muscle
force and joint moment about multiple degrees of freedom in the human
lower extremity. PLoS One, 2012. 7(12): p. e52618.
[9] Kim, W. S., et al., Development of a muscle circumference sensor to
estimate torque of the human elbow joint. Sensors and Actuators A:
Physical, 2014. 208: p. 95-103.
[10] Cochrane, C., M. Lewandowski, and V. Koncar, A flexible strain sensor
based on a Conductive Polymer Composite for in situ measurement of
parachute canopy deformation. Sensors (Basel), 2010. 10(9): p. 8291-
303.
[11] Mattmann, C., F. Clemens, and G. Tröster, Sensor for Measuring Strain
in Textile. Sensors, 2008. 8(6): p. 3719-3732.
[12] Wang, Y. Y., et al., Novel fabric pressure sensors: design, fabrication,
and characterization. Smart Materials & Structures, 2011. 20(6).
[13] Yi, W., et al., Investigation of carbon black/silicone
elastomer/dimethylsilicone oil composites for flexible strain sensors.
Polymer Testing, 2012. 31(5): p. 677-684.
[14] Dejnabadi, H., B. M. Jolles, and K. Aminian, A new approach to
accurate measurement of uniaxial joint angles based on a combination of
accelerometers and gyroscopes. Biomedical Engineering, IEEE
Transactions on, 2005. 52(8): p. 1478-1484.
[15] Doheny, E. P., et al., Effect of elbow joint angle on force-EMG
relationships in human elbow flexor and extensor muscles. J
Electromyogr Kinesiol, 2008. 18(5): p. 760-70.