Response of Chickpea Genotypes to Drought

Water is the main component of biological processes. Water management is important to obtain higher productivity. In this study, some of the yield components were investigated together with different drought levels. Four chickpea genotypes (CDC Frontier, CDC Luna, Sawyer and Sierra) were grown in pots with 3 different irrigation levels (a dose of 17.5 ml, 35 ml and 70 ml for each pot per day) after three weeks from sowing. In the research, flowering, pod set, pod per plant, fertile pod, double seed/pod, stem diameter, plant weight, seed per plant, 1000 seed weight, seed diameter, vegetation length and weekly plant height were measured. Consequently, significant differences were observed on all the investigated characteristics owing to genotypes (except double seed/pod and stem diameter), water levels (except first pod, seed weight and height on 3rd week) and genotype x water level interaction (except first pod, double seed/pod, seed weight and height).




References:
[1] Kahraman, A., Önder, M. and Ceyhan, E., 2011. Biodiversity and
biosecurity in Turkey. Biology, Environment and Chemistry (ICBEC
2011), Volume 24, Page 33-37, December 28-30, Dubai, UAE.
[2] McPhee, K. E. and Muehlbauer, F. J., 2001. Biomass production and
related characters in the core collection of Pisum germplasm. Genetic
Resources and Crop Evaluation, 48: 195-203.
[3] Önder, M., Ceyhan, E. and Kahraman, A., 2011. Effects of agricultural
practices on environment. Biology, Environment and Chemistry (ICBEC
2011), Volume 24, Page 28-32, December 28-30, Dubai, UAE.
[4] Ceyhan, E., Kahraman, A. and Önder, M., 2012. The effects of
environment on plant products. International Journal of Bioscience,
Biochemistry and Bioinformatics, Volume 2, no 1, Page 48-51.
[5] Sekhon, H. S. and Singh, G., 2007. Irrigation management in chickpea.
Chickpea Breeding and Management. Edited by S. S. Yadav, R. Redden,
W. Chen and B. Sharma. Cab International. Cambridge, MA, USA.
[6] Önder, M. and Kahraman, A., 2009. Antinutritional factors in food
grain legumes. 1st International Syposium on Sustainable Development,
volume 3, page 40-44, June 8-10, Sarajevo.
[7] Yadav, S.S., Redden, R., Chen, V. and Sharma, B., 2007. Chickpea
breeding and management. cab international. Cambridge, MA, USA.
[8] Ganjeali, A., Porsa, H. and Bagheri, A., 2011. Assessment of Iranian
chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) germplasms for drought. Agricultural
Water Management, 98: 1477-1484.
[9] Anonymous, 2012. dspace.icrisat.ac.in/bitstream/.../PMD53.pdf. Cold -
tolerant chickpea varieties. ICRISAT. Plant material descriptipn no 53.
[10] Eser, D., Geçit, H.H., Emekliler, H.Y and Kavuncu, O., 1989. Nohut gen
materyalinin zenginleştirilmesi ve değerlendirilmesi. Turk J. Agric.,
13(2):246-254.
[11] L. Leport, N.C. Turner, S.L. Davies and K.H.M. Siddique, "Variation in
pod production and abortion among chickpea cultivars under terminal
drought", Europ. J. Agronomy, 24: 236-246, 2006.
[12] Liu, P. H., Gan, Y., Warkentin, T. and McDonlad, C., 2003.
Morphological plasticity of chickpea in a semiarid environment. Crop
Sci., 43: 426-429.
[13] Cokkizgin, A., 2012. Botanical characteristics of chickpea genotypes
(Cicer arietinum L.) under different plant densities in organic farming.
Scientific Research and Essays. Vol. 7 (4), pp. 498-503.
[14] McPhee, K. E., Spaeth, S. C. and Muehlbauer, F. C., 1997. Seed yield
and residue production of lentil cultivars grown at different slope
positions. J. Prod. Ag. 10: 602-607.
[15] Wang, J., Gan, Y. T., Clarke, F. and McDonald, C. L., 2006. Response
of chickpea yield to high temperature stress during reproductive
development. Crop. Sci., 46: 2171-2178.
[16] Cinsoy, A.S., A├º─▒kgöz, N., Yaman, M., K─▒t─▒k─▒, A. 1997. Ege bölgesinden
toplanan nohut (Cicer arietinum L.) genetik kaynaklar─▒ materyalinin
karakterizasyonu kantitatif karakterler. Anadolu, J of AARI, 7 (1), 1-14.
[17] Cubero, J.I.,1987. Morphology Chickpea. The Chickpea C.A.B.
International ICARDA. (Eds. M.C. Saxena and K.B. Singh), Aleppo,
Syria.
[18] Upadhyaya, H. D., 2003. Geographical patterns of variation for
morphological and agronomic characteristics in the chickpea germplasm
collection. Euphytica 132: 343-352.