Probabilistic Characteristics of older PR Frames in the Mid-America Earthquake Region
Probabilistic characteristics of seismic responses of the
Partially Restrained connection rotation (PRCR) and panel zone
deformation (PZD) installed in older steel moment frames were
investigated in accordance with statistical inference in
decision-making process. The 4, 6 and 8 story older steel moment
frames with clip angle and T-stub connections were designed and
analyzed using 2%/50yrs ground motions in four cities of the
Mid-America earthquake region. The probability density function and
cumulative distribution function of PRCR and PZD were determined
by the goodness-of-fit tests based on probabilistic parameters
measured from the results of the nonlinear time-history analyses. The
obtained probabilistic parameters and distributions can be used to find
out what performance level mainly PR connections and panel zones
satisfy and how many PR connections and panel zones experience a
serious damage under the Mid-America ground motions.
[1] A. Ang and W. H. Tang, Probability Concepts in Engineering Planning
and Design. 2nd ed. vol I & II, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2006.
[2] D. H. Kim and R. T. Leon, "Seismic performance of PR frames in
frames in the Mid-America Earthquake Region," ASCE J. of Structural
Engineering, vol. 133, no. 12, pp. 1808-1820, 2007.
[3] AISC, Steel Construction Manual. 5th ed., American Institute of Steel
Construction, 1952.
[4] Anderson, Blume, Degenkolb, Hammill, Knapik, Marchand, Powers,
Rinne, Sedgwick, and Sjoberg, "Lateral Forces of Earthquake and
Wind," Transactions, ASCE, vol. 117, p. 716, 1952.
[5] C. W. Roeder, R. T. Leon, and F. R. Preece, Strength, Stiffness and
Ductility of Older Steel Structures under Seismic Loading. Report
SGEM 94-4, Department of Civil Engineering, University of
Washington, Seattle, 1994.
[6] G. P. Forcier, Seismic Performance of Older Steel Frames. Ph.D.
dissertation, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering,
University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, June 1994.
[7] CERI, Center for Earthquake Research and Information. University of
Memphis, http://www.ceri.memphis.edu/public/, 2001.
[8] Y. K. Wen and C. L. Wu, "Generation of Ground Motions for Mid-
America Cities," University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, December
2000.
[9] Papageorgiou et al., Engineering Seismology Laboratory (ESL) at the
State University of New York at Buffalo, 2002.
[10] A. M. Law and W. D. Kelton, Simulation Modeling and Analysis. 4th
ed., McGraw Hill, 2007.
[11] FEMA, NEHRP Guidelines for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings.
Report FEMA-273, Federal Emergency Management Agency,
Washington, D.C., 1997.
[12] FEMA, Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of
Buildings. Report FEMA-356, Federal Emergency Management
Agency, Washington, D.C., November 2000.
[1] A. Ang and W. H. Tang, Probability Concepts in Engineering Planning
and Design. 2nd ed. vol I & II, John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2006.
[2] D. H. Kim and R. T. Leon, "Seismic performance of PR frames in
frames in the Mid-America Earthquake Region," ASCE J. of Structural
Engineering, vol. 133, no. 12, pp. 1808-1820, 2007.
[3] AISC, Steel Construction Manual. 5th ed., American Institute of Steel
Construction, 1952.
[4] Anderson, Blume, Degenkolb, Hammill, Knapik, Marchand, Powers,
Rinne, Sedgwick, and Sjoberg, "Lateral Forces of Earthquake and
Wind," Transactions, ASCE, vol. 117, p. 716, 1952.
[5] C. W. Roeder, R. T. Leon, and F. R. Preece, Strength, Stiffness and
Ductility of Older Steel Structures under Seismic Loading. Report
SGEM 94-4, Department of Civil Engineering, University of
Washington, Seattle, 1994.
[6] G. P. Forcier, Seismic Performance of Older Steel Frames. Ph.D.
dissertation, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering,
University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, June 1994.
[7] CERI, Center for Earthquake Research and Information. University of
Memphis, http://www.ceri.memphis.edu/public/, 2001.
[8] Y. K. Wen and C. L. Wu, "Generation of Ground Motions for Mid-
America Cities," University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, December
2000.
[9] Papageorgiou et al., Engineering Seismology Laboratory (ESL) at the
State University of New York at Buffalo, 2002.
[10] A. M. Law and W. D. Kelton, Simulation Modeling and Analysis. 4th
ed., McGraw Hill, 2007.
[11] FEMA, NEHRP Guidelines for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings.
Report FEMA-273, Federal Emergency Management Agency,
Washington, D.C., 1997.
[12] FEMA, Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of
Buildings. Report FEMA-356, Federal Emergency Management
Agency, Washington, D.C., November 2000.
@article{"International Journal of Earth, Energy and Environmental Sciences:52907", author = "Do-Hwan Kim and Roberto Leon", title = "Probabilistic Characteristics of older PR Frames in the Mid-America Earthquake Region", abstract = "Probabilistic characteristics of seismic responses of the
Partially Restrained connection rotation (PRCR) and panel zone
deformation (PZD) installed in older steel moment frames were
investigated in accordance with statistical inference in
decision-making process. The 4, 6 and 8 story older steel moment
frames with clip angle and T-stub connections were designed and
analyzed using 2%/50yrs ground motions in four cities of the
Mid-America earthquake region. The probability density function and
cumulative distribution function of PRCR and PZD were determined
by the goodness-of-fit tests based on probabilistic parameters
measured from the results of the nonlinear time-history analyses. The
obtained probabilistic parameters and distributions can be used to find
out what performance level mainly PR connections and panel zones
satisfy and how many PR connections and panel zones experience a
serious damage under the Mid-America ground motions.", keywords = "Mid-America earthquake, Panel zone, PR connection, Probabilistic characteristics, seismic performance", volume = "5", number = "11", pages = "664-10", }