Improving Utilization of Sugarcane by Replacing Ordinary Propagation Material with Small Chips of Sugarcane Planted in Paper Pots

Sugarcane is an important resource for bioenergy. Fields are usually established by using 15-20 cm pieces of sugarcane stalks as propagation material. An alternative method is to use small chips with nodes from sugarcane stalks. Plants from nodes are often established in plastic pots, but plastic pots could be replaced with biodegradable paper pots. This would be a more sustainable solution, reducing labor costs and avoiding pollution with plastic. We compared the establishment of plants from nodes taken from three different part of the sugarcane plant. The nodes were planted in plastic and paper pots. There was no significant difference between plants established in the two pot types. Nodes from different part of the stalk had different sprouting capacity. Nodes from the top parts sprouted significantly better than nodes taken from the middle or nodes taken closed to the ground in two experiments. Nodes with a length of 3 cm performed better than nodes with a length of 2 cm.




References:
[1] J. Goldemberg and L.A.H. Nogueira, “Sweetening the biofuel sector. The history of sugarcane ethanol in Brazil,” Bioenergy connection. 2004. http://bioenergyconnection.org/article/sweetening-biofuel-sector-history-sugarcane-ethanol-brazil.
[2] Companhia Nacional de Abstecimento, “Acompanhamento de Safra Brasileira, Cana-de Açúcar”, Safra 2013 / 2014 Segundo Levantamento Agosto / 2013. 2014.
[3] M.G.D.A. Landell et al.,”Sistema de multiplicação de cana-de-açúcar com uso de mudas pré-brotadas (MPB), Oriundas de gemas individualizadas”, Campinas. Documentos IAC 109, 2012.
[4] D.A.S. Rosa, “Sistema De Produção De Mudas Pré-Brotadas (MTA)”. Universidade Federal de São Carlos, Centro de Ciências Agrárias. 2013.
[5] S. Nambuthiri et al.,”Moving toward sustainability with alternative containers for greenhouse and nursery crop production: A review and research update,” HortTechnology, 2015, Vol. 25(1), pp.8–16.
[6] Yara, 2016, http://www.yara.co.uk/images/PG-Mix-Leaflet_tcm430-103368.pdf.
[7] E.F.F Júnior, “Considerações sobre o manejo de irrigação na produtividade e qualidade de gemas de cana-de-açúcar para viveiros de mudas-pré-brotadas (MPB). Escola Superior de Agricultura Luiz de Queiroz. 2015.
[8] F. Santos and V. Diola, “Physiology,” in “Sugarcane,” 1st edition. F. Santos, A. Borém, and C. Caldas, eds. Elsevier, 2015 pp. 13–33.
[9] D.L. Haase, “Morphological and physiological evaluations of seedling quality”, in National proceedings: Forest and Conservation Nursery Associations, Riley LE, Dumroese R.K., Landis T.D. (tech. cords) National proceedings: Forest and Conservation Nursery Associations-2006. Proc. RMRS-P-50. Fort Collins, CO: US Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station, 2007. pp. 38.
[10] P.C. Whiteman, T.A. Bull, and K.T. Glasziou, “The physiology of sugarcane,” Aust. J. Biol. Sci., 1963, vol. 16(2), pp.416–428.
[11] M. Tsakaldimi, M. et al.,”Root Morphology, Stem Growth and Field Performance of Seedlings of Two Mediterranean Evergreen Oak Species Raised in Different Container Types”, Plant and Soil, 2005, vol. 278, pp. 85–93.
[12] A. Lindström and G. Rune, “Root Deformation in Plantations of Container-grown Scot Pine Trees: Effect on Root Growth, Tree Stability and Stem Straightness”. Plant and Soil, 1999, vol. 217 pp. 29–37.
[13] M.R. Halter, C.P. Chanway, and G.J. Harper, “Growth Reduction and Root Deformation of Containerized Lodgepole Pine Saplings 11 Years after Planting,” Forest Ecology and Management, 1993, vol. 56, pp. 131–146.