Health-Related QOL of Motorists with Spinal Cord Injury in Japan

The Japanese version of the SF-36 has been employed to assess individuals’ health-related QOL (HRQOL). This study aimed to clarify the HRQOL of motorists with a spinal cord injury, in order to compare these individuals' SF-36 scores and national standard values. A total of 100 motorists with a spinal cord injury participated in this study. Participants’ HRQOL was evaluated using the Japanese version of the SF-36 (second edition). The score for each subscale was standardized based on data on the Japanese population. The average scores for NPF, NRP, NBP, NGH, NVT, NSF, NRE, and NMH were 10.9, 41.8, 45.9, 47.1, 46.1, 46.7, 46.0, and 47.4 points, respectively. Subjects showed significantly lower scores for NPF and NRP compared with national standard values, which were both ≤ 45.0 points, but relatively normal scores for the other items: NBP, NGH, NVT, NSF, NRE and NMH (> 45.0 points). The average scores for PCS, MCS and RCS were 21.9, 56.0, and 50.0 points, respectively. Subjects showed a significantly lower PCS score (≤ 20.0 points); however, the MCS score was higher (> 55.0 points) along with a relatively normal RCS score in these individuals (= 50.0 points).

Authors:

• Hiroaki Hirose
• Hiroshi Ikeda
• Isao Takeda

Keywords:

• Health-related QOL (HRQOL)
• SF-36
• motorist
• spinal cord injury
• Japan.

References:

[1] Pappa, E., Kontodimopoulos, N. & Niakas, D. (2005). Validation and
norming of the Greek SF-36 Health Survey. Quality of Life Research, 14,
1433-1438.
[2] Jenkinson, C., Stewart-Brown, S., Petersen, S. & Paice, C. (1999).
Assessment of the SF-36 version 2 in the United Kingdom. J Epidemiol
Community Health, 53, 46-50.
[3] Fukuhara, S., Bito, S., Green, J., Hsiao, A. & Kurokawa, K. (1998).
Translation, adaptation, and validation of the SF-36 Health Survey for use
in Japan. J Clin Epidemiol, 51 (11), 1037-1044.
[4] Fukuhara, S. & Suzukamo, Y. (2004). Manual of SF-36v2 Japanese
version, Institute for Health Outcomes & Process Evaluation research,
Kyoto. [5] Tate, DG., Kalpakjian, CZ. & Forchheimer MB. (2002). Quality of life
issues in individuals with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Rehabil, 83
(Suppl. 2), 18-25.
[6] Andresen, EM., Fouts, BS., Romeis, JC. & Brownson CA. (1999).
Performance of Health-Related Quality-of-Life instruments in a spinal
cord injured population. Arch Phys Rehabil, 80, 877-884.
[7] Westgren, N. & Levi R. (1998). Quality of life and traumatic spinal cord
injury. Arch Phys Rehabil, 79, 1433-1439.