GCM Based Fuzzy Clustering to Identify Homogeneous Climatic Regions of North-East India

The North-eastern part of India, which receives
heavier rainfall than other parts of the subcontinent, is of great
concern now-a-days with regard to climate change. High intensity
rainfall for short duration and longer dry spell, occurring due to
impact of climate change, affects river morphology too. In the present
study, an attempt is made to delineate the North-eastern region of
India into some homogeneous clusters based on the Fuzzy Clustering
concept and to compare the resulting clusters obtained by using
conventional methods and nonconventional methods of clustering.
The concept of clustering is adapted in view of the fact that, impact
of climate change can be studied in a homogeneous region without
much variation, which can be helpful in studies related to water
resources planning and management. 10 IMD (Indian Meteorological
Department) stations, situated in various regions of the North-east,
have been selected for making the clusters. The results of the Fuzzy
C-Means (FCM) analysis show different clustering patterns for
different conditions. From the analysis and comparison it can be
concluded that nonconventional method of using GCM data is
somehow giving better results than the others. However, further
analysis can be done by taking daily data instead of monthly means to
reduce the effect of standardization.

• Arup K. Sarma
• Jayshree Hazarika

• Climate change
• conventional and nonconventional methods of clustering
• FCM analysis
• homogeneous regions.

[1] D. Mehrotra and R. Mehrotra, “Climate change and hydrology with
emphasis on the Indian subcontinent,” Hydrological Sciences Journal,
vol. 40:2, pp. 231-242, April 1995.
[2] R. L. Wilby, H. Hassan, and K. Hanaki, “Statistical downscaling of
hydrometeorological variables using general circulation model output,”
Journal of Hydrology, vol. 205, pp. 1-19, 1998.
[3] R. L. Wilby, T. M. L. Wigley, D. Conway, P. D. Jones, B.C. Hewitson,
J. Main, and D. S. Wilks, “Statistical downscaling of general circulation
model output: A comparison of methods,” Water Resources Research,
vol. 34, no. 11, pp. 2995-3008, Nov. 1998.
[4] X.-C. Zhang, “Spatial downscaling of global climate model output for
site-specific assessment of crop production and soil erosion,”
Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, vol. 135, pp. 215-229, 2005.
[5] A. K. Gosain, S. Rao, and D. Basuray, “Climate change impact
assessment on hydrology of Indian river basins,” Current Science, vol.
90, no. 3, pp. 346-353, Feb. 2006.
[6] H. D. Fill, and J. R. Stedinger, “Homogeneity tests based upon Gumbel
distribution and a critical appraisal of Dalrymple’s test,” Journal of
Hydrology, vol. 166, pp. 81-105, 1995.
[7] A. Habib, and M. Ellouze, “Hydrological delineation of homogeneous
regions in Tunisia,” Water Resources Management, vol. 20, pp. 961–
977, 2006.
[8] P. Satyanarayana, and V.V. Srinivas, “Regionalization of precipitation in
data sparse areas using large scale atmospheric variables – A fuzzy
clustering approach,” Journal of Hydrology, vol. 405, pp. 462–473,
2011.