Evaluating the Feasibility of Magnetic Induction to Cross an Air-Water Boundary

A magnetic induction based underwater communication
link is evaluated using an analytical model and a custom
Finite-Difference Time-Domain (FDTD) simulation tool. The
analytical model is based on the Sommerfeld integral, and a full-wave
simulation tool evaluates Maxwell’s equations using the FDTD
method in cylindrical coordinates. The analytical model and FDTD
simulation tool are then compared and used to predict the system
performance for various transmitter depths and optimum frequencies
of operation. To this end, the system bandwidth, signal to noise
ratio, and the magnitude of the induced voltage are used to estimate
the expected channel capacity. The models show that in seawater, a
relatively low-power and small coils may be capable of obtaining a
throughput of 40 to 300 kbps, for the case where a transmitter is at
depths of 1 to 3 m and a receiver is at a height of 1 m.




References:
[1] A. Zoksimovski, D. Sexton, M. Stojanovic, and C. Rappaport,
“Underwater electromagnetic communications using conduction -
channel characterization,” Ad Hoc Netw., vol. 34, no. C, p. 42–51, Nov.
2015. [Online]. Available: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adhoc.2015.01.017
[2] F. Tonolini and F. Adib, “Networking across boundaries:
Enabling wireless communication through the water-air interface,”
in ACM SIGCOMM 2018 Confrence, ser. SIGCOMM ’18.
New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2018. [Online]. Available:
http://doi.org/10.1145/3230543.3230580
[3] D. Gibson, Channel Characterisation and System Design for
Sub-Surface Communications. Leeds, Great Britain: Lulu Enterprises,
2010.
[4] J. R. Wait, “Electromagnetic fields of sources in lossy media,” in
Antenna Theory - Part 2. McGraw-Hill, 1969, pp. 468–471.
[5] M. Domingo, “Magnetic induction for underwater wireless
communication networks,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag., vol. 60,
no. 6, pp. 2929–2939, 2012.
[6] H. Guo, Z. Sun, and P. Wang, “Multiple Frequency Band Channel
Modeling and Analysis for Magnetic Induction Communication in
Practical Underwater Environments,” IEEE Transactions on Vehicular
Technology, vol. PP, no. 99, pp. 1–1, 2017.
[7] S. Taflove, A. Hagness, Computational Electrodynamics: The
Finite-Difference Time-Domain Method, 3rd ed. Boston, Massachusetts:
Artech House, 2005.
[8] M. N. O. Sadiku, Numerical Techniques in Electromagnetics with
MATLAB, 3rd ed. Boca Raton, Florida: CRC Press, 2015.
[9] K. S. Yee, “Numerical solution of initial boundary value problems
involving maxwell’s equations in isotropic media,” IEEE Transactions
on Antennas and Propagation, vol. 14, pp. 302–307, 1966.
[10] R. C. Rumpf, “Electromagnetic analysis using finite-difference
time-domain,” University of Texas at El Paso, available:
https://empossible.net/academics/emp5304, Last accessed 03 March
2020.
[11] W. Stutzman and G. Thiele, Antenna Theory and Design, ser.
Antenna Theory and Design. Wiley, 2012. [Online]. Available:
https://books.google.ca/books?id=xhZRA1K57wIC
[12] C. A. Balanis, Antenna Theory: Analysis and Design, 4th ed. Hoboken,
New Jersey: Wiley, 2016.
[13] Z. Lathi, B. P. Ding, Modern Digital and Analog Communication
Systems, 5th ed. New York, New York: Oxford University Press, 2019.