Enzyme Involvement in the Biosynthesis of Selenium Nanoparticles by Geobacillus wiegelii Strain GWE1 Isolated from a Drying Oven

The biosynthesis of nanoparticles by microorganisms,
on the contrary to chemical synthesis, is an environmentally-friendly
process which has low energy requirements. In this investigation, we
used the microorganism Geobacillus wiegelii, strain GWE1, an
aerobic thermophile belonging to genus Geobacillus, isolated from a
drying oven. This microorganism has the ability to reduce selenite
evidenced by the change of color from colorless to red in the culture.
Elemental analysis and composition of the particles were verified
using transmission electron microscopy and energy-dispersive X-ray
analysis. The nanoparticles have a defined spherical shape and a
selenium elemental state. Previous experiments showed that the
presence of the whole microorganism for the reduction of selenite
was not necessary. The results strongly suggested that an intracellular
NADPH/NADH-dependent reductase mediates selenium
nanoparticles synthesis under aerobic conditions. The enzyme was
purified and identified by mass spectroscopy MALDI-TOF TOF
technique. The enzyme is a 1-pyrroline-5-carboxylate dehydrogenase.
Histograms of nanoparticles sizes were obtained. Size distribution
ranged from 40-160 nm, where 70% of nanoparticles have less than
100 nm in size. Spectroscopic analysis showed that the nanoparticles
are composed of elemental selenium. To analyse the effect of pH in
size and morphology of nanoparticles, the synthesis of them was
carried out at different pHs (4.0, 5.0, 6.0, 7.0, 8.0). For
thermostability studies samples were incubated at different
temperatures (60, 80 and 100 ºC) for 1 h and 3 h. The size of all
nanoparticles was less than 100 nm at pH 4.0; over 50% of
nanoparticles have less than 100 nm at pH 5.0; at pH 6.0 and 8.0 over
90% of nanoparticles have less than 100 nm in size. At neutral pH
(7.0) nanoparticles reach a size around 120 nm and only 20% of them
were less than 100 nm. When looking at temperature effect,
nanoparticles did not show a significant difference in size when they
were incubated between 0 and 3 h at 60 ºC. Meanwhile at 80 °C the
nanoparticles suspension lost its homogeneity. A change in size was
observed from 0 h of incubation at 80ºC, observing a size range
between 40-160 nm, with 20% of them over 100 nm. Meanwhile
after 3 h of incubation at size range changed to 60-180 nm with 50%
of them over 100 nm. At 100 °C the nanoparticles aggregate forming
nanorod structures. In conclusion, these results indicate that is
possible to modulate size and shape of biologically synthesized
nanoparticles by modulating pH and temperature.





References:
[1] C. Ip, “Selenium and ER stress response: Implication and exploitation
for cancer therapy”. Proceedings of the International Conference on
Selenium in Biology and Medicine, July 2006, pp. 25-30, University
Wisconsin, Madison, pp: 63-63.
[2] X. Gao, J. Zhang, L. Zhang, “Hollow sphere selenium nanoparticles.
Their in vitro anti-hydroxyl radical effect”. Adv. Mater, vol. 14, no. 4,
pp. 290- 293, Feb. 2002.
[3] H. Wang, J. Zhang, H. Yu, “Elemental selenium at nano size possesses
lower toxicity without compromising the fundamental effect on
selenoenzymes: comparison with selenomethionine in mice”, Free
Radic. Biol. Med., vol. 42, no. 10, pp. 1524-1533, May 2007.
[4] D. Peng, J. Zhang, Q. Liu, E. Taylor, “Size effect of elemental selenium
nanoparticles (Nano-Se) at supranutritional levels on selenium
accumulation and glutathione S-transferase activity”, J. Inorg. Biochem.,
vol. 101, no. 10, pp. 1457-1463, Oct. 2007.
[5] R. Oremland, M. Herbel, J. Blum, S. Langley, T. Beveridge, P. Jayan,
T. Sutto, A. Ellis, S. Curran, “Structural and spectral features of
selenium nanospheres produced by Se-respiring bacteria”, Appl.
Environ. Microbiol., vol., 70, no. 1, pp. 52-60, Jan. 2004.
[6] P. Tejo, N. Sharma, R. Prakash, K. Raina, J. Fellowes, C. Pearce, J.
Lloyd, R. Pattrick, “Aerobic microbial manufacture of nanoscale
selenium: exploiting nature’s bio-nanomineralization potential”,
Biotechnol. Lett., vol. 31, no. 12, pp. 1857-1862, Aug. 2009.
[7] V. Yadav, N. Sharma, R. Prakash, K. Raina, L. Bharadwaj, P. Tejo,
“Generation of Selenium containing Nano-structures by soil bacterium,
Pseudomonas aeruginosa”, Biotechnol., vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 299-304,
2008.
[8] A. Abdelouas, W. Gong, W. Lutze, J. Shelnutt, R. Franco, I. Moura,
“Using cytochrome c3 to make selenium nanowires” Chem. Mater., vol.
12, no. 6, pp. 1510-1512, May 2000.
[9] Y. Gorby, T. Beveridge, R. Blakemore, “Characterization of the
bacterial magnetosome membrane”. J. Bacteriol., vol. 170, no. 2, pp.
834-841, Feb. 1988.
[10] W. Leinfelder, K. Forchhammer, F. Zinoni, G. Sawers, M. Mandrand-
Berthelot, A. Böck, “Escherichia coli genes whose products are
involved in selenium metabolism”. J. Bacteriol., vol. 170, no. 2, pp.
540-546, Feb. 1988.
[11] M. Tanaka, Y. Okamura, A. Arakaki, T. Tanaka, H. Takeyama, T.
Matsunaga, “Origin of magnetosome membrane: proteomic analysis of
magnetosome membrane and comparison with cytoplasmic
membrane”, Proteomics, vol. 6, no. 19, pp. 5234-5247, Oct. 2006.
[12] A. Arakaki, J. Webb, T. Matsunaga, “A novel protein tightly bound to
bacterial magnetic particles in magnetospirillum magneticum strain
AMB-1” J. Biol. Chem. Vol. 278, no. 10, pp. 8745-8750, Mar. 2003.
[13] G. Kaur, M. Iqbal, M. Bakshi, “Biomineralization of fine selenium
crystalline rods and amorphous spheres”. J. Phys. Chem. C vol.
113, no. 31, pp. 13670-13676, July 2009.
[14] J. Dobias, E. Suvorova, R. Bernier-Latmani, “Role of proteins in
controlling selenium nanoparticle size”, Nanotechnology, vol. 22, no.
19, pp. 1-9, May 2011.
[15] S. He, Z. Guo, Y. Zhang, S. Zhang, J. Wang, N. Gu, “Biosynthesis of
gold nanoparticles using the bacteria Rhodopseudomonas
capsulata”. Mater Lett., vol. 61, no. 18, pp. 3984-3987, July 2007.
[16] D. Correa-Llantén, J. Larraín-Linton, P. Muñoz, M. Castro., F.
Boehmwald, J. Blamey, “Characterization of the thermophilic bacterium
Geobacillus sp. Strain GWE1 isolated from a sterilization oven”, Korean
J. Microbiol. Biotechnol., vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 278-283, Sept. 2013.
[17] M. Amenábar, J. Blamey, “Purification and characterization of a
thermostable glutamate dehydrogenase from a thermophilic bacterium
isolated from a sterilization drying oven”, B.M.B. Rep., vol., 45, no. 2,
pp. 91-95, Feb. 2012.
[18] P. Fesharaki, P. Nazari, M. Shakibaie, S. Rezaie, M. Banoee, M.
Abdollahi, A. Shahverdi, “Biosynthesis of selenium nanoparticles
using KlebsielIa pneumoniae and their recovery by a simple
sterilization process”, Braz. J. Microbiol., vol. 41, no. 2, pp. 461–466,
June 2010.