Determination of Some Agricultural Characters of Developed Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Lines

This research was made during the 2015 growing periods in the trial filed of "Research Station for Department of Field Crops, Agricultural Faculty, Selcuk University" according to “Randomized Blocks Design” with 3 replications. Research material was the following pea lines; PS16, PS18, PS21, PS23, PS24, PS25, PS36, PS47, PS49, PS51, PS54, PS58, PS67, PS69, PS71, PS73, PS83, PS84, PS87 and PSKY and three cultivars and other 2 commercial varieties named as Bolero, Rondo and Ultrello. Some agronomical characteristics such as plant height (cm) number of pod per plant number of seed per pod number of seed per plant 100 seed weight (g) and seed yield (kg ha-1) were determined. The highest seed yield was obtained 2727.0 kg ha-1 in the PS71 line and the lowest value was obtained 1238.0 kg ha-1 in the commercial variety of Bolero. Results of the research implicated that the new developed lines were superior compared with the control (commercial) varieties by means of most of the characteristics. Nevertheless, similar researches should be continued in different locations and years.

Authors:

• Ercan Ceyhan
• Mehmet Ali Avci

Keywords:

• Agricultural characters
• pea
• Pisum sativum
• seed yield.

References:

[1] A. Akcin, “Yemeklik Tane Baklagiller” Selcuk Üniversitesi Yayınları
43, Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları: 8, pp. 307–367, 1988.
[2] E. Ceyhan, “Determination of Some Agricultural Characters and Their
Heredity Though Line x Tester Method in Pea Parents and Crosses”,
Selcuk University, Gradutate School of Natural and Applied Science,
Ph.D. Thesis, pp. 103, 2003 (Tr).
[3] E. Ce yhan, and M.A. Avci, “Combining Ability and Heterosis for Grain
Yield and Some Yield Components in Pea (Pisum sativum L.)”,
Pakistan J Bio. Sci., vol. 8, no. 10, pp. 1447-1452, 2005.
[4] E. Ceyhan, M.A. Avci, and K.E. MCPhee, “The Determination of Grain
Yield and Some Agronomical Characters as Winter Cultivation of Pea
(Pisum sativum L.) Genotypes in Konya Ecological Conditions”, S.U.
Zir. Fak. Der., vol. 19, no. 37, pp. 6-12, 2005.
[5] E. Ceyhan, M.A. Avcı and S.Karadaş, “Line x Tester Analysis in Pea
(Pisum sativum L.):Identification of Superior Parents for Seed Yield and
Its Components”, African J. Bio., vol. 7, no. 16, pp.2810-2817, 2008.
[6] E. Ceyhan, A. Kahraman, M.K. Ates, and S. Karadaş, “Stability
Analysis on Seed Yield and Its Components in Peas”, Bulgarian J. Agri.
Sci., vol. 18, pp. 887-893, 2012.
[7] M. Öz, and A. Karasu, “Bazı Bezelye (Pisum sativum L) Çeşitlerinin
Tohum Verimi ve Verim Komponentlerinin Belirlenmesi”, SDU Zir.
Fak. Der., vol. 5, no. 1, pp.44-49, 2010.
[8] G. Demirci, and S. Unver, “The Effects of Different Sowing Time on
Yield and Yield Components in Pea (Pisum sativum L.) in Ankara
Conditions”, Anadolu J AARI, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 49–60, 2005.
[9] T.N. Khan, A. Ramzan, G. Jillani and T. Mehmood, “Morphological
Performance of Peas (Pisum sativum) Genotypes Under Rainfed
Conditions of Potowar Region”, J. Agric. Res., vol. 51, no. 1, pp. 51-60,
2013.
[10] M. Avci, and E. Ceyhan, “Determination of Some Agricultural
Characters of Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Genotypes”, JAVA, vol. 12, no. 7,
pp. 798-802, 2013.
[11] M. Önder, and E. Ceyhan, “Relations Among Seed Yield and Some
Morphological Characteristics of Pea Cultivars(Pisum sativum L.) Sown
in Various Sowing Dates Under Central Anatolian”, S.Ü. Zir. Fak. Der.,
vol. 15, no. 25, pp. 173-183, 2001.
[12] M.I. Ashraf, M.A. Pervez, M. Amjad, R. Ahmad, and M. Ayub,
“Qualitative and Quantitative Response of Pea (Pisum sativum L.)
Cultivars to Judicious Applications of Irrigation with Phosphorus and
Potassium”, Pak. J. Life Soc. Sci., vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 159-164, 2011.
[13] T. Nleya, and J. Rickertsen, “Seeding Rate and Variety Effects on Yield
Yield Components and Economic Return of Field Pea in the Northern
Great Plains”, http://www.plantmanagementnetwork.org/pub/cm/
research/2011/pea/ (05.07.2013), 2011.
[14] V. Kosev, and A. Mikic, “Assessing Relationships Between Seed Yield
Components in Spring-Sown Field Pea (Pisum sativum L.) Cultivars in
Bulgaria by Correlation and Path Analysis”, Span J Agric Res., vol. 10,
no. 4, pp. 1075-1080, 2012.
[15] Ö. Alan, and H. Geren, “Bezelye’de (Pisum sativum L.) Farklı Ekim
Zamanlarının Tane Verimi ve Diğer Bazı Tarımsal Özellikler Üzerine
Etkisi” Ege Üniv. Ziraat Fak. Derg., vol. 49, no. 2, pp. 127-134, 2012..
[16] K.E. McPhee, and F.J., Muehlbauer, “Biomass Production and Related
Characters in the Core Collection of Pisum germpasm” Gen. Res. and
Crop Evo., vol. 48, pp. 195-203, 2001. [17] A. Rasaei, M.E. Ghobadi and M. Ghobadi, “Effect of Supplemental
Irrigation and Plant Density on Yield and Yield Components of Peas
(Pisum sativum L.) in Kermanshah Region American”, Eurasian J.
Agric. & Environ. Sci., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 352-357, 2012.
[18] M.J. Santalla, M. Amurrio and A.M. De Ron, “Food and Feed Potential
Breeding Value of Green Dry and Vegetable Pea Germplasm”, Can. J.
Plant Sci., vol. 81, pp. 601-610, 2001.
[19] J.D. Singh, and I.P. Singh, “Selection Parameters for Seed Yield in Field
Pea (Pisum sativum L.)”, Nat. J. Plant Improvement, 6(1):51-52, 2004.