Comparison of Newton Raphson and Gauss Seidel Methods for Power Flow Analysis

This paper presents a comparative study of the Gauss Seidel and Newton-Raphson polar coordinates methods for power flow analysis. The effectiveness of these methods are evaluated and tested through a different IEEE bus test system on the basis of number of iteration, computational time, tolerance value and convergence.





References:
[1] A. Shahriari, H. Mokhlis, Ab Halim Abu Bakar “Critical Reviews Of Load Flow Methods For Well, Ill And Unsolvable Condition” Journal of Electrical Engineering, Vol. 63, No. 3, , pp. 144–152, 2012
[2] G. Leoniopoulos “Efficient starting point of load-flow equations” International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, Vol. 16, Issue 6, pp. 419-422, December 1994
[3] H. S. Huang and C. N. Lu “Vector implementations of fast decoupled and Gauss-Seidel load flows” Electrical Power & Energy Systems, Vol. 17, No. 5, pp. 355-358, 1995
[4] Abilio Manuel Variz, Vander Menengoy da Costa, José Luiz R. Pereira, Nelson Martins “Improved representation of control adjustments into the Newton–Raphson power flow” International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, Vol. 25, Issue 7, pp. 501-513, September 2003
[5] W. Hubbi and A. Refsum “Starting algorithm and modification for Newton-Raphson load-flow method” International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, Vol. 5, Issue 3, ,pp. 166-172, July 1983
[6] S. Mallick, D.V. Rajan, S.S. Thakur, P. Acharjee, S.P. Ghoshal “Development of a new algorithm for power flow analysis” International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems Vol. 33, pp. 1479–1488, 2011
[7] H.Abaal, E.Talbi and R.Skouri “A Comparison of Newton Raphson and Gauss Seidel Methods for Power Flow Analysis” 1st International Symposium on Computational Mathematics and Engineering Sciences. Faculty of Sciences and Techniques Errachidia, Morocco, Mar 3-6, 2016