Clarification of Synthetic Juice through Spiral Wound Ultrafiltration Module at Turbulent Flow Region and Cleaning Study
Synthetic juice clarification was done through spiral
wound ultrafiltration (UF) membrane module. Synthetic juice was
clarified at two different operating conditions, such as, with and
without permeates recycle at turbulent flow regime. The performance
of spiral wound ultrafiltration membrane was analyzed during
clarification of synthetic juice. Synthetic juice was the mixture of
deionized water, sucrose and pectin molecule. The operating
conditions are: feed flowrate of 10 lpm, pressure drop of 413.7 kPa
and Reynolds no of 5000. Permeate sample was analyzed in terms of
volume reduction factor (VRF), viscosity (Pa.s), ⁰Brix, TDS (mg/l),
electrical conductivity (μS) and turbidity (NTU). It was observe that
the permeate flux declined with operating time for both conditions of
with and without permeate recycle due to increase of concentration
polarization and increase of gel layer on membrane surface. For
without permeate recycle, the membrane fouling rate was faster
compared to with permeate recycle. For without permeate recycle,
the VRF rose up to 5 and for with recycle permeate the VRF is 1.9.
The VRF is higher due to adsorption of solute (pectin) molecule on
membrane surface and resulting permeateflux declined with VRF.
With permeate recycle, quality was within acceptable limit. Fouled
membrane was cleaned by applying different processes (e.g.,
deionized water, SDS and EDTA solution). Membrane cleaning was
analyzed in terms of permeability recovery.
[1] P. Rai, G.C. Majumdar, S. Das Gupta and S. De, "Effect of various
pretreatment methods on permeate flux and quality during ultrafiltration
of mosambi juice" J. Food Eng., Volume 78, Issue 2, 2007, pp. 561-568.
[2] A.J. Burggraaf and L. Cot, Fundamentals of Inorganic Membrane
Science and Technology, in: C.A.M. Siskens (Eds.), Application of
ceramic membrane in liquid filtration, Elsevier Science., The
Netherlands, 1996, pp. 619-639.
[3] Z. F. Cui and H. S. Muralidhara, Membrane Technology: A Practical
Guide to Membrane Technology and applications in food and
bioprocessing, first ed., Butterworth-Heinemann publication, 2010, pp.
6-7.
[4] A. Chabeaud, L. Vandanjon, P. Bourseau, P. Jaouen, M. Chaplain-
Derouiniot and F. Guerard, "Performances of ultrafiltrationmembranes
for fractionating a fish protein hydrolysate: Application to the refining of
bioactive peptidic fractions" Sep. Sci. Technol., Volume 66, Issue 3,
2009, pp. 463-471.
[5] N. Jacob, R.K. Sukumaran , P. Prema, Optimization of enzymatic
clarification of sapodilla juice: A statistical perspective, Appl. Biochem.
Biotechnol., 151 (2008),pp.353-363.
[6] P.D. Gurak, L.M.C. Cabral, M.H.M.R. Leao, V.M. Matta, S.P. Freitas,
Quality evaluation of grape juice concentrated by reverse osmosis, J.
Food Eng., 96 (2010), pp. 421-426.
[7] A. Cassano, J. Adzet, R. Molinari, M.G. Buonomenna, J. Roig, E.
Drioli, Membrane treatment by nanofiltration of exhausted vegetable
tannin liquors from the leather industry, Water Res., 37 (2003), pp.
2426-2434.
[8] A. Zirehpour, M. Jahanshahi, A. Rahimpour, Unique membrane process
integration for olive oil mill wastewater purification, Sep. Purif.
Technol., 96 (2012), pp. 124-131.
[1] P. Rai, G.C. Majumdar, S. Das Gupta and S. De, "Effect of various
pretreatment methods on permeate flux and quality during ultrafiltration
of mosambi juice" J. Food Eng., Volume 78, Issue 2, 2007, pp. 561-568.
[2] A.J. Burggraaf and L. Cot, Fundamentals of Inorganic Membrane
Science and Technology, in: C.A.M. Siskens (Eds.), Application of
ceramic membrane in liquid filtration, Elsevier Science., The
Netherlands, 1996, pp. 619-639.
[3] Z. F. Cui and H. S. Muralidhara, Membrane Technology: A Practical
Guide to Membrane Technology and applications in food and
bioprocessing, first ed., Butterworth-Heinemann publication, 2010, pp.
6-7.
[4] A. Chabeaud, L. Vandanjon, P. Bourseau, P. Jaouen, M. Chaplain-
Derouiniot and F. Guerard, "Performances of ultrafiltrationmembranes
for fractionating a fish protein hydrolysate: Application to the refining of
bioactive peptidic fractions" Sep. Sci. Technol., Volume 66, Issue 3,
2009, pp. 463-471.
[5] N. Jacob, R.K. Sukumaran , P. Prema, Optimization of enzymatic
clarification of sapodilla juice: A statistical perspective, Appl. Biochem.
Biotechnol., 151 (2008),pp.353-363.
[6] P.D. Gurak, L.M.C. Cabral, M.H.M.R. Leao, V.M. Matta, S.P. Freitas,
Quality evaluation of grape juice concentrated by reverse osmosis, J.
Food Eng., 96 (2010), pp. 421-426.
[7] A. Cassano, J. Adzet, R. Molinari, M.G. Buonomenna, J. Roig, E.
Drioli, Membrane treatment by nanofiltration of exhausted vegetable
tannin liquors from the leather industry, Water Res., 37 (2003), pp.
2426-2434.
[8] A. Zirehpour, M. Jahanshahi, A. Rahimpour, Unique membrane process
integration for olive oil mill wastewater purification, Sep. Purif.
Technol., 96 (2012), pp. 124-131.
@article{"International Journal of Chemical, Materials and Biomolecular Sciences:58243", author = "Vijay Singh and Chandan Das", title = "Clarification of Synthetic Juice through Spiral Wound Ultrafiltration Module at Turbulent Flow Region and Cleaning Study", abstract = "Synthetic juice clarification was done through spiral
wound ultrafiltration (UF) membrane module. Synthetic juice was
clarified at two different operating conditions, such as, with and
without permeates recycle at turbulent flow regime. The performance
of spiral wound ultrafiltration membrane was analyzed during
clarification of synthetic juice. Synthetic juice was the mixture of
deionized water, sucrose and pectin molecule. The operating
conditions are: feed flowrate of 10 lpm, pressure drop of 413.7 kPa
and Reynolds no of 5000. Permeate sample was analyzed in terms of
volume reduction factor (VRF), viscosity (Pa.s), ⁰Brix, TDS (mg/l),
electrical conductivity (μS) and turbidity (NTU). It was observe that
the permeate flux declined with operating time for both conditions of
with and without permeate recycle due to increase of concentration
polarization and increase of gel layer on membrane surface. For
without permeate recycle, the membrane fouling rate was faster
compared to with permeate recycle. For without permeate recycle,
the VRF rose up to 5 and for with recycle permeate the VRF is 1.9.
The VRF is higher due to adsorption of solute (pectin) molecule on
membrane surface and resulting permeateflux declined with VRF.
With permeate recycle, quality was within acceptable limit. Fouled
membrane was cleaned by applying different processes (e.g.,
deionized water, SDS and EDTA solution). Membrane cleaning was
analyzed in terms of permeability recovery.", keywords = "Synthetic juice, Spiral wound,ultrafiltration,
Reynolds No, Volume reduction factor.", volume = "7", number = "1", pages = "56-5", }