An Energy-Latency-Efficient MAC Protocol for Wireless Sensor Networks

Because nodes are usually battery-powered, the energy presents a very scarce resource in wireless sensor networks. For this reason, the design of medium access control had to take energy efficiency as one of its hottest concerns. Accordingly, in order to improve the energy performance of MAC schemes in wireless sensor networks, several ways can be followed. In fact, some researchers try to limit idle listening while others focus on mitigating overhearing (i.e. a node can hear a packet which is destined to another node) or reducing the number of the used control packets. We, in this paper, propose a new hybrid MAC protocol termed ELE-MAC (i.e. Energy Latency Efficient MAC). The ELE-MAC major design goals are energy and latency efficiencies. It adopts less control packets than SMAC in order to preserve energy. We carried out ns- 2 simulations to evaluate the performance of the proposed protocol. Thus, our simulation-s results prove the ELE-MAC energy efficiency. Additionally, our solution performs statistically the same or better latency characteristic compared to adaptive SMAC.




References:
[1] K. Kredo and P. Mohapatra, "Medium Access Control in Wireless Sensor
Networks", Computer Networks, Volume 51 , Issue 4, March 2006, pp.
961-994.
[2] S.C. Ergen and P. Varaiya, "PEDAMACS: Power Efficient and Delay
Aware Medium Access Protocol for Sensor Networks", IEEE Transactions
on Mobile Computing, vol. 5, no. 7, July 2006, pp. 920-930.
[3] LAN MAN Standards Committee of the IEEE Computer Society, IEEE
Std 802.11-1999, Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and
Physical Layer (PHY) specifications, 1999.
[4] W. Ye, J. Heidemann and D. Estrin, "An Energy-Efficient MAC Protocol
for Wireless Sensor Networks", in Proceedings of the IEEE Conference
on Computer Communications (INFOCOM-02), June 2002, pp. 1567-
1576.
[5] W. Ye, J. Heidemann and D. Estrin, "Medium Access Control With Coordinated
Adaptive Sleeping for Wireless Sensor Networks", in IEEE/ACM
Transactions on Networking, June 2004, pp. 493-506.
[6] J. Polastre, J. Hill and D. Culler, Versatile Low Power Media Access for
Wireless Sensor Networks, in Proceedings of the ACM Conference on
Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (Sensys-04), November 2004, pp.
95-107.
[7] I. Rhee, A. Warrier, M. Aia and J. Min, "ZMAC: a Hybrid MAC for
Wireless Sensor Networks", in Proceedings of the third ACM Conference
on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems (Sensys-05), November 2005,
pp. 90-101.
[8] ASH Designer guide, RF Monolithics, Inc, -RFM TR3000-,
http://www.rfm.com, accessed September 2007.
[9] The CMU Monarch Project, "The CMU Monarch Project-s Wireless
and Mobility extensions to NS", http://www.isi.edu/nsnam/ns/, accessed
September 2007.
[10] A. Muneeb, S. Umar, D. Adam, V. Thiemo, R. Kay, L. Koen, P. Joseph
and U. A. Zartash, "Medium Access Control Issues in Sensor Networks",
ACM SIGCOMM Computer Communication Review, Vol 36, Number 2,
April 2006, pp. 33-36.
[11] H. W. Tseng, S. H. Yang, P. Y. Chuang, E. H. Kuang Wu and G. H. Chen,
"An Energy Consumption Analytic Model for A Wireless Sensor MAC
Protocol", in Proceedings of the IEEE Vehicular Technology Conference
(VTC-2004), September 2004, pp. 4533-4537.
[12] P. Sun, X. Zhang, Z. Dong, Y. Zhang, "A Novel Energy Efficient
Wireless Sensor MAC Protocol", in Proceedings of the of the Fourth
International Conference on Networked Computing and Advanced Information
Management (ICNCAI-08), 2008, pp. 68-72.
[13] B. Karp and H. T. Kung, "GPSR: Greedy Perimeter Routing for Wireless
Networks", in Proceedings of 6th Annual ACM/IEEE International Conference
on Mobile Computing and Networking (MobiCom-00), August
2000, pp. 243-254.