A Finite Element/Finite Volume Method for Dam-Break Flows over Deformable Beds

A coupled two-layer finite volume/finite element
method was proposed for solving dam-break flow problem
over deformable beds. The governing equations consist of the
well-balanced two-layer shallow water equations for the water flow
and a linear elastic model for the bed deformations. Deformations
in the topography can be caused by a brutal localized force or
simply by a class of sliding displacements on the bathymetry.
This deformation in the bed is a source of perturbations, on
the water surface generating water waves which propagate with
different amplitudes and frequencies. Coupling conditions at the
interface are also investigated in the current study and two mesh
procedure is proposed for the transfer of information through the
interface. In the present work a new procedure is implemented at
the soil-water interface using the finite element and two-layer finite
volume meshes with a conservative distribution of the forces at
their intersections. The finite element method employs quadratic
elements in an unstructured triangular mesh and the finite volume
method uses the Rusanove to reconstruct the numerical fluxes. The
numerical coupled method is highly efficient, accurate, well balanced,
and it can handle complex geometries as well as rapidly varying
flows. Numerical results are presented for several test examples of
dam-break flows over deformable beds. Mesh convergence study is
performed for both methods, the overall model provides new insight
into the problems at minimal computational cost.




References:
[1] M. Banner and W.Peirson. Wave breaking onset and strength for two
dimensional deep water wave groups. J. Fluid Mech, 585:93–115, 2007.
[2] A. Bermudez, J. Ferrin, L. Savedra, and M. Vazques-Cendon. A
projection hybrid finite volume/element method for low-mach number
flows. J. Comput. Phys, 271:360–378, 2014.
[3] H. Dark and L. Stewart. An analytical model for predicting underwater
noise radiated from offshore pile driving. In Proceedings of the fifth
Asia pacific congress on computational mechanics Conference, pages
2–20, December 2013.
[4] H. Dark and L. Stewart. An analytical model for wind-driven arctic
summer sea ice drift. The cryosphere, 10:227–244, 2016.
[5] U. Drahne, N. Goseberg, S. Vatar, N. Beisiegal, and J. Behrens. An
experimental and numerical study of long wave run-up on a plane beach.
Journal of marine science and engineering, 4:1–23, 2016.
[6] M. Le Gal, D. Violeau, R. Ata, and X. Wang. Shallow water numerical
models for the 1947 gisborne and 2011 tohoku-oki tsunami with
kinematic seismic generation. Coastal Engineering, 139:1–15, 2018.
[7] J. Greenberg and A. Leroux. A well-balanced scheme for the numerical
processing of source terms in hyperbolic equations. SIAM J.Numer.Anal,
33:1–16, 2006.
[8] R. Harcourt. A second moment model of langmuir turbulance. J. Phys.
Oceanogr, 43:673–697, 2013.
[9] C. Liao, Z. Lin, Y. Guo, and D. Jeng. Coupling model for waves
propagating over a porous seabed. Theoritical and applied mechanics
letters, 5:85–88, 2015.
[10] C. Ng. Water waves over a muddy bed: a two-layer strokes boundary
layer model. Coastal engineering, 40:221–242, 2000.
[11] H. Poulos and E. Davis. Elastic solutions for soil and rock mechanics.
The University of Sydney, Australia, 1991.
[12] D. Tong, C. Liao, J. Chen, and Q. Zhang. Numerical simulations of a
sandy seabed response to water surface waves propagating on current.
Journal of marine science and engineering, 6:1–14, 2018.