Public Participation Regarding Heritage Preservation in Former Communist Countries: The Case of Tobacco City in Plovdiv, Bulgaria

In times of rapid globalization, the significance of cultural and architectural heritage is rising, as it is a key element to define the identity of a place, a city, even a country. Its preservation, conservation, and revitalization are everyone’s responsibility, and the public is growing more aware of that fact. The citizens are looking for a way to actively participate in the decision-making in projects regarding heritage sites. Public involvement in the planning process is not a new phenomenon, especially in Western countries. However, countries, such as the former communist states of Eastern Europe, have been less studied. Based on established theories, this paper analyses the level of citizens’ inclusion in projects regarding heritage preservation, using the example of the Tobacco City in Plovdiv, Bulgaria. As this case is exemplary for Bulgaria, it illustrates the current condition of public participation country-wise. At the same time, considering the former communist states have had a similar socio-economic and political development in the past several decades, it is possible to apply the conclusions to most of these countries with only slight variations.

Authors:

• Mirela Svetoslavova

Keywords:

• architectural heritage
• Bulgaria
• heritage preservation
• post-communist countries
• public participation
• Tobacco City
• warehouses

References:

[1] J. Innes and D. Booher, Reframing public participation: strategies for
the 21st century. Planning Theory & Practice, 5(4), 2004, pp.419-436.
[2] S. Arnstein, A Ladder Of Citizen Participation. Journal of the
American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 1969, pp.216-224
[3] A. Slaev, A. Kovachev, B. Nozharova, D. Daskalova, P. Nikolov, and
P. Petrov, Overcoming the failures of citizen participation: The
relevance of the liberal approach in planning. Planning Theory,
18(4), 2019, pp.448-469.
[4] A. Kovachev, A. Slaev, B. Nozharova, et al. Can public participation
contribute to sustainable mobility? – The experience of Bulgarian
cities. In: Bolay, JC, Maričić, T, Zeković, S (eds) Support to Urban
Development Process. Lausanne: EPFL, IAUS, 2018, pp. 59–79.
[5] M. Svetoslavova, Challenges in Preservation of Industrial Heritage in
Former Communist Countries: The Case of Bulgaria,
ARCHTHEO'18 Conference Proceedings, 2018, pp.89-96.
[6] D. Kostov, Heritage conservation in Bulgaria: issues relating to
private sponsorship. ICOMOS Journals of the German National
Committee, 10, 1997, pp.29-31.
[7] Plovdiv - European Capital of Culture 2019, Tobacco City, 2016
[online] Available at:
https://plovdiv2019.eu/en/platform/transforms/130-градскимечти/456-тютюневият-град/
[8] P. Kalinkova, Stories from the Tobacco city. [online] Tobaccocity.plovdiv2019.eu, 2016 Available at: http://tobacco-
city.plovdiv2019.eu/en/a/90-stories-from-the-tobacco-city/c28-thetobacco-city-history-and-archive-materials/c21-about-the-project
[9] http://whata.org/blog; date of access: 15.01.2020
[10] http://google.com/maps; date of access: 18.06.2018
[11] http://tutun.kab-plovdiv.com/; date of access: 18.06.2018
[12] http://tobacco-city.plovdiv2019.eu; date of access: 18.06.2018
[13] https://dnes.dir.bg/gallery/plovdiv-sgrada-sabarjane-zhiva-veriga21921796; date of access: 21.07.2019
[14] https://www.bnr.bg/hristobotev/post/100666637; date of access
21.07.2019
[15] https://www.dnevnik.bg/bulgaria/2016/08/20/2814428/; date of
access: 21.07.2019
[16] https://gradat.bg/news/2017/01/11/2896618_tjutjuneviiat_grad_indust
rialnoto_kulturno_nasledstvo/&rubrname=news; date of access:
09.05.2019
[17] National Institute for Immovable Cultural Heritage (NIICH) Bulgaria
http://ninkn.bg/; date of access: 11.08.2017
[18]