Effect of Cow bone and Groundnut Shell Reinforced in Epoxy Resin on the Mechanical Properties and Microstructure of the Composites

It is an established fact that polymers have several physical limitations such as low stiffness and low resistance to impact on loading. Hence, polymers do not usually have requisite mechanical strength for application in various fields. The reinforcement by high strength fibers provides the polymer substantially enhanced mechanical properties and makes them more suitable for a large number of diverse applications. This research evaluates the effects of particulate Cow bone and Groundnut shell additions on the mechanical properties and microstructure of cow bone and groundnut shell reinforced epoxy composite in order to assess the possibility of using it as a material for engineering applications. Cow bone and groundnut shell particles reinforced with epoxy (CBRPC and GSRPC) was prepared by varying the cow bone and groundnut shell particles from 0-25 wt% with 5 wt% intervals. A Hybrid of the Cow bone and Groundnut shell (HGSCB) reinforce with epoxy was also prepared. The mechanical properties of the developed composites were investigated. Optical microscopy was used to examine the microstructure of the composites. The results revealed that mechanical properties did not increase uniformly with additions in filler but exhibited maximum properties at specific percentages of filler additions. From the Microscopic evaluation, it was discovered that homogeneity decreases with increase in % filler, this could be due to poor interfacial bonding.

Authors:

• O. I. Rufai
• G. I. Lawal
• B. O. Bolasodun
• S. I. Durowaye
• J. O. Etoh

Keywords:

• Groundnut shell reinforced polymer composite (GSRPC)
• Cow bone reinforced polymer composite (CBRPC)
• Hybrid of ground nutshell and cowbone (HGSCB).

References:

[1] Prakash Tudu, “Processing and characterization of natural fiber
reinforced polymer composites, 2009”. B.Tech Thesis, Dept. of
Mechanical Engineering, National Institute of Technology Rourkela-
769008, India.
[2] B. Deepa, “Structure, properties and recyclability of natural fiber
reinforced polymer composites. Recent Developments in Polymer
Recycling, 2011” 101-120 ISBN: 978-81-7895-524-7.
[3] K. Begum, “Natural Fiber as a substitute to Synthetic Fiber in Polymer
Composites: A Review. Research Journal of Engineering Sciences,
2013”.
[4] Cláudia I. T. Navarro, “Microstructural Characterization of Natural
Fibers: Etlingeraelatior, Costuscomosus, and Heliconiabihai. Hindawi
Publishing Corporation Conference Papers in Materials Science,
Volume 2013” Article ID 878014, pp. 7.
[5] A.L. Naidu, “Study On Mechanical Behavior Of Groundnut Shell Fiber
Reinforced Polymer Metal Matrix Composities, 2013” International
Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT) Vol. 2 Issue 2,
February- 2013 ISSN: 2278-0181.
[6] J.O. Agunsoye, “Mechanical Properties and Tribological Behaviour of
Recycled Polyethylene/Cow Bone Particulate Composite, 2013” Journal
of Materials Science Research; Vol. 2, No. 2; 2013 ISSN 1927-0585 EISSN
1927-0593. Published by Canadian Center of Science and
Education.
[7] O.O. Isiaka, “Influence of Cow Bone Particle Size Distribution on the
Mechanical Properties of Cow Bone-Reinforced Polyester Composites,
2013”. Hindawi Publishing Corporation Biotechnology Research
International Volume 2013, Article ID 725396, 5 pages
(http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/725396).
[8] S.Y. Fu, “Effects of particle size, particle/matrix interface adhesion and
particle loading on mechanical properties of particulate-polymer
composites, 2008”Composites Part B: Engineering, Volume 39, Issue 6,
September 2008, Pages 933-961.
[9] A.K. Mohanty, “Influence of chemical surface modification on the
properties of biodegradable jute fabrics—polyester amide composites,
2000”. Composites: Part A 31, 2000,pp. 143–150.