The Effect of Social Structural Change on the Traditional Turkish Houses Becoming Unusable
The traditional Turkish houses becoming unusable are
a result of the deterioration of the balanced interaction between users
and house (human and house) continuing during the history.
Especially depending upon the change in social structure, the houses
becoming neglected do not meet the desires of the users and do not
have the meaning but the shelter are becoming unusable and are
being destroyed.
A conservation policy should be developed and renovations should
be made in order to pass the traditional houses carrying the quality of
a cultural and historical document presenting the social structure, the
lifestyle and the traditions of its own age to the next generations and
to keep them alive.
[1] O. Kucukerman, Turkish House in Search of Spatial Identity, Turkiye
Turing ve Otomobil KurumuYayini, Istanbul, 2007, pp.48-49.
[2] M. Es and O. Akin, “Konut Memnuniyeti,” Sosyal Sermaye ve Yerel
Siyaset Dergisi, no:25, pp. 73-80, 2008.
[3] S. H. Eldem, Turkish Houses Ottoman Period, Turkiye Anit Cevre
Turizm Degerlerini Koruma Vakfi Yayini, Istanbul, vol:1, 1984, pp. 16.
[4] E. F Arcan and F. EVCI, Mimari Tasarima Yaklasim Bina Bilgisi
Calismalar, Tasarim Yayin Grubu, Istanbul, 1999, pp. 64-65.
[5] D. Kuban, Sanat Tarihimizin Sorunlari, Cagdas Yayinlari, Istanbul
1976, pp: 192.
[6] D., Atikand N., Erdogan, “Geleneksel Konut Mimarligini Etkileyen
Sosyo-Kulturel Faktorler: Edirne’de Sinasi Dortok Evi, ”Trakya Univ. J
Sci, 8(1), pp.21-27, 2007.
[7] M. Baran and M. Yildirim, “Geleneksel Turk Evi ve Renk Kullanimi,
”Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, vol. 2, no. 26, pp. 223-234, 2008.
[8] S. Demirarslan, “Turk Insani Icin Yapilan Konutlarda Yasam Kalitesinin
Elde Edilebilmesi Icin Gerekli Faktorler,” Konut Degerlendirme Sempozyumu 2004 I.T.U. Mimarlik Fakultesi Yayinlari, Istanbul, 2005,
pp.102.
[9] M. Goker, “Turklerde Oturma Elemanlarinin Tarihsel Gelisim Sureci,
”Journal of World of Turks, vol. 1, no.1,pp.163-169,2009.
[10] N. Kucukaslan, “Toplumsal Iliskiler ve Protokol, ”Ekonomi Sosyoloji ve
Politika Dergisi, no:1, Bursa, 2007.
[11] V. Unal, “The Problem of Divorce during the Transition from Extended
Family to Nuclear Family and Religion,” The Journal of International
Social Research, vol. 6, Issue: 26, pp.588-602, spring 2013.
[12] C. Bagavos and C. Martin, “What Happens to the European Family.
Family Observer, European Observatory on Family Matters,” European
Commission Employment and Social Affairs, no.3, pp.20–28, 2002.
[13] H. Altintas, “Psikoloji Sozlugu Uzerine Kucuk Bir Deneme,”Ankara
Universitesi Ilahiyat Fakultesi Dergisi, vol. 29, Ankara, pp.241-242,
1987.
[14] S. Budak, Psikoloji Sozlugu, Bilim ve Sanat Yayincilik, Ankara, 2000,
pp. 319.
[15] Y. Gunindil and S. Yasa Giren, “Aile Kavraminin Degisim Sureci Ve
Okul Oncesi Donemde Ailenin Onemi, ”Selcuk Universitesi Ahmet
Kelesoglu Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, no.31, pp. 349-361,2011.
[16] G. Marshall, Sosyoloji Sozlugu, Bilim ve Sanat Yayinevi, Ankara, 1999,
pp. 265.
[17] M. Yazici, “Toplumsal Degisim ve Sosyal Degerler,” Turkish Studies-
International Periodical For The Languages, Literature and History of
Turkish or Turkic, vol. 8/8, Ankara, pp. 1489-1501, Summer 2013.
[18] R. Aras, K. Yildirim and M. Utar, “Sosyo-Kulturel Degisimin
Geleneksel Urfa Evlerinde Mekan Organizasyonuna Etkisi,” G.U. Fen
Bilimleri Dergisi, no: 16 (4), pp.780,2003.
[19] N. Gultekin, “Geleneksel Konut Dokusunda Kullanim Surecinin
Değerlendirilmesi-Beypazari Orneği,” Gazi Universitesi Muh. Mim.
Fak. Dergisi, vol: 22, no: 3, pp.261-272, Ankara, 2007.
[20] S. Kaygalak, Kentin Multecileri Neoliberalizm Kosullarinda Zorunlu
Goc ve Kentlesme, Dipnot Yayinlari, Ankara, 2009, pp.9.
[21] Y. Kocak ve E. Terzi, “Turkiye’de Goc Olgusu, Goc Edenlerin Kentlere
Olan Etkileri Ve Cozum Onerileri,” Kafkas University Journal of
Economics and Administrative Sciences Faculty, Vol: 3, No: 3, pp.163-
184, 2012.
[1] O. Kucukerman, Turkish House in Search of Spatial Identity, Turkiye
Turing ve Otomobil KurumuYayini, Istanbul, 2007, pp.48-49.
[2] M. Es and O. Akin, “Konut Memnuniyeti,” Sosyal Sermaye ve Yerel
Siyaset Dergisi, no:25, pp. 73-80, 2008.
[3] S. H. Eldem, Turkish Houses Ottoman Period, Turkiye Anit Cevre
Turizm Degerlerini Koruma Vakfi Yayini, Istanbul, vol:1, 1984, pp. 16.
[4] E. F Arcan and F. EVCI, Mimari Tasarima Yaklasim Bina Bilgisi
Calismalar, Tasarim Yayin Grubu, Istanbul, 1999, pp. 64-65.
[5] D. Kuban, Sanat Tarihimizin Sorunlari, Cagdas Yayinlari, Istanbul
1976, pp: 192.
[6] D., Atikand N., Erdogan, “Geleneksel Konut Mimarligini Etkileyen
Sosyo-Kulturel Faktorler: Edirne’de Sinasi Dortok Evi, ”Trakya Univ. J
Sci, 8(1), pp.21-27, 2007.
[7] M. Baran and M. Yildirim, “Geleneksel Turk Evi ve Renk Kullanimi,
”Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, vol. 2, no. 26, pp. 223-234, 2008.
[8] S. Demirarslan, “Turk Insani Icin Yapilan Konutlarda Yasam Kalitesinin
Elde Edilebilmesi Icin Gerekli Faktorler,” Konut Degerlendirme Sempozyumu 2004 I.T.U. Mimarlik Fakultesi Yayinlari, Istanbul, 2005,
pp.102.
[9] M. Goker, “Turklerde Oturma Elemanlarinin Tarihsel Gelisim Sureci,
”Journal of World of Turks, vol. 1, no.1,pp.163-169,2009.
[10] N. Kucukaslan, “Toplumsal Iliskiler ve Protokol, ”Ekonomi Sosyoloji ve
Politika Dergisi, no:1, Bursa, 2007.
[11] V. Unal, “The Problem of Divorce during the Transition from Extended
Family to Nuclear Family and Religion,” The Journal of International
Social Research, vol. 6, Issue: 26, pp.588-602, spring 2013.
[12] C. Bagavos and C. Martin, “What Happens to the European Family.
Family Observer, European Observatory on Family Matters,” European
Commission Employment and Social Affairs, no.3, pp.20–28, 2002.
[13] H. Altintas, “Psikoloji Sozlugu Uzerine Kucuk Bir Deneme,”Ankara
Universitesi Ilahiyat Fakultesi Dergisi, vol. 29, Ankara, pp.241-242,
1987.
[14] S. Budak, Psikoloji Sozlugu, Bilim ve Sanat Yayincilik, Ankara, 2000,
pp. 319.
[15] Y. Gunindil and S. Yasa Giren, “Aile Kavraminin Degisim Sureci Ve
Okul Oncesi Donemde Ailenin Onemi, ”Selcuk Universitesi Ahmet
Kelesoglu Egitim Fakultesi Dergisi, no.31, pp. 349-361,2011.
[16] G. Marshall, Sosyoloji Sozlugu, Bilim ve Sanat Yayinevi, Ankara, 1999,
pp. 265.
[17] M. Yazici, “Toplumsal Degisim ve Sosyal Degerler,” Turkish Studies-
International Periodical For The Languages, Literature and History of
Turkish or Turkic, vol. 8/8, Ankara, pp. 1489-1501, Summer 2013.
[18] R. Aras, K. Yildirim and M. Utar, “Sosyo-Kulturel Degisimin
Geleneksel Urfa Evlerinde Mekan Organizasyonuna Etkisi,” G.U. Fen
Bilimleri Dergisi, no: 16 (4), pp.780,2003.
[19] N. Gultekin, “Geleneksel Konut Dokusunda Kullanim Surecinin
Değerlendirilmesi-Beypazari Orneği,” Gazi Universitesi Muh. Mim.
Fak. Dergisi, vol: 22, no: 3, pp.261-272, Ankara, 2007.
[20] S. Kaygalak, Kentin Multecileri Neoliberalizm Kosullarinda Zorunlu
Goc ve Kentlesme, Dipnot Yayinlari, Ankara, 2009, pp.9.
[21] Y. Kocak ve E. Terzi, “Turkiye’de Goc Olgusu, Goc Edenlerin Kentlere
Olan Etkileri Ve Cozum Onerileri,” Kafkas University Journal of
Economics and Administrative Sciences Faculty, Vol: 3, No: 3, pp.163-
184, 2012.
@article{"International Journal of Architectural, Civil and Construction Sciences:69440", author = "Gamze Fahriye Pehlivan and Tulay Canitez", title = "The Effect of Social Structural Change on the Traditional Turkish Houses Becoming Unusable", abstract = "The traditional Turkish houses becoming unusable are
a result of the deterioration of the balanced interaction between users
and house (human and house) continuing during the history.
Especially depending upon the change in social structure, the houses
becoming neglected do not meet the desires of the users and do not
have the meaning but the shelter are becoming unusable and are
being destroyed.
A conservation policy should be developed and renovations should
be made in order to pass the traditional houses carrying the quality of
a cultural and historical document presenting the social structure, the
lifestyle and the traditions of its own age to the next generations and
to keep them alive.
", keywords = "House, social structural change, social structural,
traditional Turkish houses.", volume = "9", number = "3", pages = "330-5", }
