The Nonlinear Dynamic Elasto-Plastic Analysis for Evaluating the Controlling Effectiveness and Failure Mechanism of the MSCSS

This paper focuses on the Mega-Sub Controlled Structure Systems (MSCSS) performances and characteristics regarding the new control principle contained in MSCSS subjected to strong earthquake excitations. The adopted control scheme consists of modulated sub-structures where the control action is achieved by viscous dampers and sub-structure own configuration. The elastic-plastic time history analysis under severe earthquake excitation is analyzed base on the Finite Element Analysis Method (FEAM), and some comparison results are also given in this paper. The result shows that the MSCSS systems can remarkably reduce vibrations effects more than the mega-sub structure (MSS). The study illustrates that the improved MSCSS presents good seismic resistance ability even at 1.2g and can absorb seismic energy in the structure, thus imply that structural members cross section can be reduce and achieve to good economic characteristics. Furthermore, the elasto-plastic analysis demonstrates that the MSCSS is accurate enough regarding international building evaluation and design codes. This paper also shows that the elasto-plastic dynamic analysis method is a reasonable and reliable analysis method for structures subjected to strong earthquake excitations and that the computed results are more precise.




References:
[1] M. Q. Feng and A. Mita 1995. Vibration control of tall buildings using
mega-sub configuration. ASCE. Journal of engineering mechanics,
121(10): 1082~1087.
[2] W. Chai and Maria Q. Feng. 1997. Vibration control of super tall
buildings subjected to wind loads. Int. J. Non- linear Mechanics, 32(4):
657~668..
[3] Zhang. X.A., Zhang. J.L. and Jiang, J.S. 2004. The influence of
sub-structural stiffness on the dynamic property of the MSC frame. 2004.
Journal of Northwestern Polytechnical University.Vol.22 (1),
2004:59-63
[4] Zhang Xun-an, Wang Dong and Jiang Jiesheng. 2005. The controlling
mechanism and the controlling effectiveness of passive
mega-sub-controlled frame subjected to random wind loads. Journal of
Sound and Vibration, 283: 543-560
[5] Zhang X. A, Qin X. J´╝î Cherry S, Lian Y. D. 2009. A new proposed
passive mega-sub controlled structure and response control. Journal of
earthquake engineering. 13(2):252ÔÇö274.
[6] Lian Y. d, Zhang X. A. 2006. The study of dampers in the MSC frame.
Industrial Building. Vol. 36(2), 2006:16-19..
[7] Lian Y.D, Zhang X.A, Cherry S 2007. Damping characteristics of friction
damped braced frame and its effectiveness in the mega-sub controlled
structure system. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration, 6
(2):171-181.
[8] X. Y. Gao, R. Q. He. 2004. Research on Equivalent Model of
Mega-structure. Journal of University of Science and Technology of
Suzhou, vol. 16, no. 2, pp, 66ÔÇö72..
[9] SAP2000 Integrated Finite Element Analysis and Design of Structures,
steel design manual, Computers and Structures, Inc. Berkeley, California,
USA.
[10] SAP2000 Linear and Nonlinear Static and Dynamic Analysis and Design
of Three-Dimensional Structures, Computers and Structures, Inc.
Berkeley, California, USA.
[11] Zou Lin 2011. A Study on Reliability for Resisting Seismic Loading
Based Structural Optimization of MSCSS. M.S thesis, Northwester
polytechnical university..
[12] X. J. Qin, X. A. Zhang and C Sheldon. 2008. Study on semi-active control
of mega-sub controlled structure by MR damper subjected to random
wind loads. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration
[13] Xiangjun Qin, Xun-an Zhang. 2009. Vibration controlling characteristics
of a New Improved Mega-Sub Controlled Structure subjected to random
wind load. In Proceedings of the International MultiConference of
Engineers and Computer Scientists 2009 Vol II IMECS 2009, March 18 -
20, 2009, Hong Kong..
[14] FEMA356, The Federal Emergency Management Agency, USA.
[15] GB 5011õ©Ç2001 (2001). National Standard of the People's Republic of
China. Code for Seismic Design of Buildings..