A Review of Test Protocols for Assessing Coating Performance of Water Ballast Tank Coatings

Concerns on corrosion and effective coating
protection of double hull tankers and bulk carriers in service have
been raised especially in water ballast tanks (WBTs). Test
protocols/methodologies specifically that which is incorporated in the
International Maritime Organisation (IMO), Performance Standard
for Protective Coatings for Dedicated Sea Water ballast tanks (PSPC)
are being used to assess and evaluate the performance of the coatings
for type approval prior to their application in WBTs. However, some
of the type approved coatings may be applied as very thick films to
less than ideally prepared steel substrates in the WBT. As such films
experience hygrothermal cycling from operating and environmental
conditions, they become embrittled which may ultimately result in
cracking. This embrittlement of the coatings is identified as an
undesirable feature in the PSPC but is not mentioned in the test
protocols within it. There is therefore renewed industrial research
aimed at understanding this issue in order to eliminate cracking and
achieve the intended coating lifespan of 15 years in good condition.
This paper will critically review test protocols currently used for
assessing and evaluating coating performance, particularly the IMO
PSPC.

• Emmanuel A. Oriaifo
• Noel Perera
• Alan Guy
• Pak. S. Leung
• Kian T. Tan

• Corrosion Test
• Hygrothermal Cycling
• Coating Test Protocols
• Water Ballast Tanks.

[1] ABS Guidance Note on the Inspection, Maintenance and Application of
Marine Coating Systems 2007.
[2] E. Askheim, J.O. Nokleby, L. Carlsson, and M. Palm, "Why Do Paints
Crack,” P.C.E, March 2001.
[3] J. Eliasson, D. Rauta, and T. Gunner, "Ballast Water Tank Coatings for
the Future” CORROSION2005.
[4] C. H. Hare, "Failure Analysis Part:I”, JPCL, October 2001.
[5] IACS Recommendation 87 Guidelines for Coating Maintenance &
Repairs for Ballast Tanks and Combined Cargo/Ballast tanks on Oil
Tanker. June 2006.
[6] International Maritime Organisation Performance Standard for
Protective Coating (IMO PSPC).
[7] D.M. George and J. Eliasson, "Future Cargo and Ballast Tank Lining
for Ship Tanks – Forward Looking Technology”, SSPC 2005 New
Orleans.
[8] D.M. George and J. Eliasson, "Factors Influencing Early Crack
Development in Marine Cargo and Ballast Tank Coatings”.
[9] K. B. Tator, "Risk Assessment and Economic Considerations When
Coating Ballast Tanks”, NIST 2004 Special Publication 1035.
[10] L. Thorsten, "Implementing The IMO PSPC for Ballast Water Tanks,”
JPCL February 2009.
[11] H. Vold, "Evaluating Protective Coating for Ballast Tanks”, PCE, June
1997.
[12] B. J. Zhang, C. Lim, B. C. Kim, and D. G. Lee, "Stress Analysis and
Evaluation of Cracks Developed on Coatings for Welded Joints of Water
Ballast Tanks”, CORROSION2005.
[13] J. Azevedo, "A New Approach for Ballast & Cargo Tank Coating: A
Solvent-Free and Humidity Tolerant Epoxy System with Edge-Retentive
Properties”.
[14] National Research Council "Stemming the Tide” (1996 p.22).
Controlling Introductions of Nonindigenous Species by Ship’ Ballast
Water
[15] I. Rowell, "Tankers and FPSO Corrosion”, NIST 2004 Special
Publication 1035
[16] P.F. Weber, "An Overview of the Tanker Structure Cooperative Forum”,
TSCF 2007 Shipbuilders Meeting
[17] DNV "Classification Focus on Protective Coating”, October 1998