Abstract: Given that concrete masonry walls are expected to experience shrinkage combined with thermal expansion and contraction, and in some cases even carbonation, throughout their service life, cracking is to be expected. However, after concrete masonry walls have been placed into service, originally anticipated and accounted for cracking is often misdiagnosed as a structural defect. Such misdiagnoses often result in or are used to support litigation. This paper begins by discussing the causes and types of anticipated cracking within concrete masonry walls followed by a discussion on the processes and analyses that exists for properly evaluating them and their significance. From here, the paper then presents a case of misdiagnosed concrete masonry cracking and the flawed logic employed to support litigation.
Abstract: This paper discusses the forensic investigation of a
fatality-involved catastrophic structure collapse and the special
challenges faced when tasked with directing such an effort. While
this paper discusses the investigation’s findings and the outcome of
the event; this paper’s primary focus is on the challenges faced
directing a forensic investigation that requires coordinating with
governmental oversight while also having to accommodate multiple
parties’ investigative teams. In particular the challenges discussed
within this paper included maintaining on-site safety and operations
while accommodating outside investigator’s interests. In addition this
paper discusses unique challenges that one may face such as what to
do about unethical conduct of interested party’s investigative teams,
“off the record” sharing of information, and clandestinely transmitted
evidence.