Abstract: This paper presents a comparison of average outgoing
quality limit of the MCSP-2-C plan with MCSP-C when MCSP-2-C
has been developed from MCSP-C. The parameters used in MCSP-2-
C are: i (the clearance number), c (the acceptance number), m (the
number of conforming units to be found before allowing c nonconforming
units in the sampling inspection), f1 and f2 (the sampling
frequency at level 1 and 2, respectively). The average outgoing
quality limit (AOQL) values from two plans were compared and we
found that for all sets of i, r, and c values, MCSP-2-C gives higher
values than MCSP-C. For all sets of i, r, and c values, the average
outgoing quality values of MCSP-C and MCSP-2-C are similar when
p is low or high but is difference when p is moderate.
Abstract: This paper developed the c-Chart based on a Zero- Inflated Poisson (ZIP) processes that approximated by a geometric distribution with parameter p. The p estimated that fit for ZIP distribution used in calculated the mean, median, and variance of geometric distribution for constructed the c-Chart by three difference methods. For cg-Chart, developed c-Chart by used the mean and variance of the geometric distribution constructed control limits. For cmg-Chart, the mean used for constructed the control limits. The cme- Chart, developed control limits of c-Chart from median and variance values of geometric distribution. The performance of charts considered from the Average Run Length and Average Coverage Probability. We found that for an in-control process, the cg-Chart is superior for low level of mean at all level of proportion zero. For an out-of-control process, the cmg-Chart and cme-Chart are the best for mean = 2, 3 and 4 at all level of parameter.