Preparing the Curve Number (CN) and Surface Runoff Coefficient (C) Map of the Basin in the Aghche Watershed, Iran
In this research, a part of Aghche basin in Isfahan
province with an area about 2000 hectars, was chosen to be obtain
curve number coefficient runoff and W indicator in second Cook
method By using aerial photos 1968 and 1995, the satellite data of
the IRS in 2008. Then the process of land use changes in the period
of study and its effect on the changes of curve number (CN), W
indicator and surface runoff coefficient (C) of the basin was
investigated. These results showed that on the track of these land use
changes the weight averages curve number (CN), surface runoff
coefficient (C) and W indicator of the basin were increased to 0.92,
0.02 and 0.78 unit in the first period of study and 1.18, 0.03, 0.99
Unit in the second period of study respectively.
[1] O. Symeonakis E., S. Koukoulas, A. Calvo, and E. Arnau, 2004.A land
use change and land degradation study in Spain and Greece using
Remote Sensing and GIS, proceeding of XXth International Society for
Photogrammetric and Remote Sensing Congress, Istanbul, Turkey 12 -
23 July2004.
[2] Fohrer, N., S. Haverkamp, K. Eckhardt, and H. Frede, 2001. Hydrologic
response to land use changes on the catchment scale. Physics and
Chemistry of the Earth, Part B: Hydrology, Oceans & Atmosphere, 26:
577-582.
[3] Shrestha M. N., 2003. Spatially distributed hydrological modeling
considering land-use change using remote sensing and GIS In The
proceeding of 2003 Asia Map Conference, Nepal.
[4] Kochenderfer, J., N. Edwards, J. Pamela, and F. Wood, 1997.
Hydrologic impacts of logging an Appalachian Watershed Using West
Virginia's Best Management Practices, North Journal of applied
forestry, 14(4):207-218.
[5] Melesse, A. M., W. D. Graham and J. D. Jordan, 2003. Spatially
distributed watershed mapping and modeling: GIS based storm runoff
response and hydrograph analysis: Part 2, Journal of Spatial Hydrology,
3 (2):2-28.
[6] Tan, C. H., A. M. Melesse and S.S. Yeh, 2002. Remote sensing and
Geographic Information System in runoff coefficient estimation in
China Taipe. Proceeding of Asian Association on Remote Sensing
(AARS).
[7] Barati, S., S. Soltani Kupaee, S. J. Khajeh aldin, and B. Rayegani, 2010.
The review of land use changes in Qalleh Shahrokh sub basin by using
remote measuring techniques(period 1976 - 2003), Journal of Science
and Agricultural Techniques and Natural Resources, 47: 349 - 365.
[8] Soil Conservation Service (SCS). National Engineering Handbook,
Section 4 Hydrology. (US Department of Agriculture, Washington DC),
1985.
[9] McCuen, R. H., 1998. Hydrologic Analysis and Design. Prentice-Hall
press. New Jersey
[10] United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). National Engineering
Handbook, Section 4, hydrology. Soil Conservation Service, US
Government Printing Office, (Washington, DC), 1972.
[11] Mahdavi, M., 2003. Applied Hydrology. Tehran University Press.
[12] Ziaei, H. A., 2oo2. Principles of Watershed Management Engineering.
Imam Reza University press.
[1] O. Symeonakis E., S. Koukoulas, A. Calvo, and E. Arnau, 2004.A land
use change and land degradation study in Spain and Greece using
Remote Sensing and GIS, proceeding of XXth International Society for
Photogrammetric and Remote Sensing Congress, Istanbul, Turkey 12 -
23 July2004.
[2] Fohrer, N., S. Haverkamp, K. Eckhardt, and H. Frede, 2001. Hydrologic
response to land use changes on the catchment scale. Physics and
Chemistry of the Earth, Part B: Hydrology, Oceans & Atmosphere, 26:
577-582.
[3] Shrestha M. N., 2003. Spatially distributed hydrological modeling
considering land-use change using remote sensing and GIS In The
proceeding of 2003 Asia Map Conference, Nepal.
[4] Kochenderfer, J., N. Edwards, J. Pamela, and F. Wood, 1997.
Hydrologic impacts of logging an Appalachian Watershed Using West
Virginia's Best Management Practices, North Journal of applied
forestry, 14(4):207-218.
[5] Melesse, A. M., W. D. Graham and J. D. Jordan, 2003. Spatially
distributed watershed mapping and modeling: GIS based storm runoff
response and hydrograph analysis: Part 2, Journal of Spatial Hydrology,
3 (2):2-28.
[6] Tan, C. H., A. M. Melesse and S.S. Yeh, 2002. Remote sensing and
Geographic Information System in runoff coefficient estimation in
China Taipe. Proceeding of Asian Association on Remote Sensing
(AARS).
[7] Barati, S., S. Soltani Kupaee, S. J. Khajeh aldin, and B. Rayegani, 2010.
The review of land use changes in Qalleh Shahrokh sub basin by using
remote measuring techniques(period 1976 - 2003), Journal of Science
and Agricultural Techniques and Natural Resources, 47: 349 - 365.
[8] Soil Conservation Service (SCS). National Engineering Handbook,
Section 4 Hydrology. (US Department of Agriculture, Washington DC),
1985.
[9] McCuen, R. H., 1998. Hydrologic Analysis and Design. Prentice-Hall
press. New Jersey
[10] United States Department of Agriculture (USDA). National Engineering
Handbook, Section 4, hydrology. Soil Conservation Service, US
Government Printing Office, (Washington, DC), 1972.
[11] Mahdavi, M., 2003. Applied Hydrology. Tehran University Press.
[12] Ziaei, H. A., 2oo2. Principles of Watershed Management Engineering.
Imam Reza University press.
@article{"International Journal of Earth, Energy and Environmental Sciences:49990", author = "Ali Gholami and Ebrahim Panahpour and Amir Hossein Davami", title = "Preparing the Curve Number (CN) and Surface Runoff Coefficient (C) Map of the Basin in the Aghche Watershed, Iran", abstract = "In this research, a part of Aghche basin in Isfahan
province with an area about 2000 hectars, was chosen to be obtain
curve number coefficient runoff and W indicator in second Cook
method By using aerial photos 1968 and 1995, the satellite data of
the IRS in 2008. Then the process of land use changes in the period
of study and its effect on the changes of curve number (CN), W
indicator and surface runoff coefficient (C) of the basin was
investigated. These results showed that on the track of these land use
changes the weight averages curve number (CN), surface runoff
coefficient (C) and W indicator of the basin were increased to 0.92,
0.02 and 0.78 unit in the first period of study and 1.18, 0.03, 0.99
Unit in the second period of study respectively.", keywords = "Aghche Watershed, Curve Numbers (CV), Land UseChanges, Surface Runoff Coefficient(C) Map, W indicator", volume = "5", number = "9", pages = "478-4", }