Reinforced Concrete Slab under Static and Dynamic Loadings

In this study, static and dynamic responses of a typical reinforced concrete solid slab, designed to British Standard (BS 8110: 1997) and under self and live loadings for dance halls are reported. Linear perturbation analysis using finite element method was employed for modal, impulse loading and frequency response analyses of the slab under the aforementioned loading condition. Results from the static and dynamic analyses, comprising of the slab fundamental frequencies and mode shapes, dynamic amplification factor, maximum deflection, stress distributions among other valuable outcomes are presented and discussed. These were gauged with the limiting provisions in the design code with a view of justifying valid optimization objective function for the structure that can ensure both adequate strength and economical section for large clear span slabs. This is necessary owing to the continued increase in cost of erecting building structures and the squeeze on public finance globally.




References:
[1] W. H. Mosley, J. H. Bungey, and R. Hulse, Reinforced concrete design,
Fifth edition. London MacMillan Press Ltd., 1999.
[2] E. N. Ogork, A. Aboshio, and D. Balami, “Durability Assessment of
Concrete made with Rice Husk Ash as Admixture,” J. Eng. Technol.,
vol. 4, no. 1, 2009.
[3] A. Aboshio, E. N. Ogork, and D. Balami, “Rice Husk Ash as Admixture
in Concrete,” J. Eng. Technol., vol. Vol. 4, no. 2, 2009.
[4] B.S. 8110, “Structural use of concrete-Part 1, code of practice for design
and construction.” Bristish Standard Institution, London, 1997.
[5] B. O. Aalami, “Vibration Design of Concrete Floors for Serviceability,”
Tech. Note ADAPT TN290, 2008.
[6] B.S 7385-1, “Evaluation and measurement of vibration in buildings-part
1: Guide for measurement of vibration of their effects on building.”
Bristish Standard Institution, London, 1990.
[7] P. Paultre, O. Chaallai and J. Proulx “Bride dynamics and dynamic
amplification factors-a review of analytical and experimental findings”
Canadian journal of Civil Engineering, vol. 19, 1992