Geometrical Structure and Layer Orientation Effects on Strength, Material Consumption and Building Time of FDM Rapid Prototyped Samples
Rapid Prototyping (RP) technologies enable physical
parts to be produced from various materials without depending on the
conventional tooling. Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) is one of
the famous RP processes used at present. Tensile strength and
compressive strength resistance will be identified for different sample
structures and different layer orientations of ABS rapid prototype
solid models. The samples will be fabricated by a FDM rapid
prototyping machine in different layer orientations with variations in
internal geometrical structure. The 0° orientation where layers were
deposited along the length of the samples displayed superior strength
and impact resistance over all the other orientations. The anisotropic
properties were probably caused by weak interlayer bonding and
interlayer porosity.
[1] Yao, A. W., & Y.C.Tseng., A robust process optimization for a powder
type rapid prototype. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 2002, pp. 180-189.
[2] UPcraft, S., & Fletcher, R., The rapid prototyping technologies.
Assembly Automation, 2003, pp. 318-330.
[3] D. Dimitrov, K. Schreve, & Beer, N., Advances in three dimensional
printing. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 2006, pp. 136-147.
[4] Comb, J., Priedeman, W., & Turley, P, FDM technology process
improvements. Proceedings of Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium
Austin, University of Texas, 1994, pp. 42-49.
[5] Wamer, M., & Hseih, B., Let's cast a LOM part: A case study of
laminated object manufacturing machine. Proceedings of the Third
International Conference of Rapid Prototyping, Dayton: University of
Dayton, 1992, pp. 287-294.
[6] Jacobs, P., Stereolithography and Other RP&M Technologies. Rapid
Prototyping to Rapid Tooling. Dearbom, Machigan: SME, 1996.
[7] Z.Y., W., T.l., L., D.L., B., J.J., B., & H.L., M. Direct selective laser
sintering of high temperature materials. Proceedings of Solid Freeform
Fabrication Symposium, Texas at Austin, 1992, pp. 72-85.
[8] Atzeni, E., Iuliano, L., Minetola, P., & Salmi, A, Redesign and cost
estimation of manufactured plastic parts. Rapid Prototyping Journal,
2010, pp. 308-317.
[9] Rangarajan, S., QI, G., Bandyopadhyay, A., Dai, C., Ham, J.,
Bharagava, P., Danforth, S., The role of materials processing variables
in FDC process. Proceedings of the solid freeform fabrication
symposium, Marcus, 1997, pp. 431-440.
[10] Rietxed, D., Wendel, B., Feulner, R., & Schmachtenberg, E., New
thermoplastic powder for selective laser sintering. Kunststoffe
International, 2008, pp. 42-45.
[1] Yao, A. W., & Y.C.Tseng., A robust process optimization for a powder
type rapid prototype. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 2002, pp. 180-189.
[2] UPcraft, S., & Fletcher, R., The rapid prototyping technologies.
Assembly Automation, 2003, pp. 318-330.
[3] D. Dimitrov, K. Schreve, & Beer, N., Advances in three dimensional
printing. Rapid Prototyping Journal, 2006, pp. 136-147.
[4] Comb, J., Priedeman, W., & Turley, P, FDM technology process
improvements. Proceedings of Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium
Austin, University of Texas, 1994, pp. 42-49.
[5] Wamer, M., & Hseih, B., Let's cast a LOM part: A case study of
laminated object manufacturing machine. Proceedings of the Third
International Conference of Rapid Prototyping, Dayton: University of
Dayton, 1992, pp. 287-294.
[6] Jacobs, P., Stereolithography and Other RP&M Technologies. Rapid
Prototyping to Rapid Tooling. Dearbom, Machigan: SME, 1996.
[7] Z.Y., W., T.l., L., D.L., B., J.J., B., & H.L., M. Direct selective laser
sintering of high temperature materials. Proceedings of Solid Freeform
Fabrication Symposium, Texas at Austin, 1992, pp. 72-85.
[8] Atzeni, E., Iuliano, L., Minetola, P., & Salmi, A, Redesign and cost
estimation of manufactured plastic parts. Rapid Prototyping Journal,
2010, pp. 308-317.
[9] Rangarajan, S., QI, G., Bandyopadhyay, A., Dai, C., Ham, J.,
Bharagava, P., Danforth, S., The role of materials processing variables
in FDC process. Proceedings of the solid freeform fabrication
symposium, Marcus, 1997, pp. 431-440.
[10] Rietxed, D., Wendel, B., Feulner, R., & Schmachtenberg, E., New
thermoplastic powder for selective laser sintering. Kunststoffe
International, 2008, pp. 42-45.
@article{"International Journal of Mechanical, Industrial and Aerospace Sciences:70362", author = "Ahmed A. D. Sarhan and Chong Feng Duan and Mum Wai Yip and M. Sayuti", title = "Geometrical Structure and Layer Orientation Effects on Strength, Material Consumption and Building Time of FDM Rapid Prototyped Samples", abstract = "Rapid Prototyping (RP) technologies enable physical
parts to be produced from various materials without depending on the
conventional tooling. Fused Deposition Modeling (FDM) is one of
the famous RP processes used at present. Tensile strength and
compressive strength resistance will be identified for different sample
structures and different layer orientations of ABS rapid prototype
solid models. The samples will be fabricated by a FDM rapid
prototyping machine in different layer orientations with variations in
internal geometrical structure. The 0° orientation where layers were
deposited along the length of the samples displayed superior strength
and impact resistance over all the other orientations. The anisotropic
properties were probably caused by weak interlayer bonding and
interlayer porosity.", keywords = "Building orientation, compression strength, rapid
prototyping, tensile strength.", volume = "9", number = "6", pages = "1086-6", }