Formation of Civic Identity in the Process of Globalization: The Example of the U.S.A. and Kazakhstan
An attempt has been made several times to identify
and discuss the U.S. experience on the formation of political nation in
political science. The purpose of this research paper is to identify the
main aspects of the formation of civic identity in the United States
and Kazakhstan, through the identification of similarities and
differences that can get practical application in making decisions of
national policy issues in the context of globalization, as well as to
answer the questions “What should unite the citizens of Kazakhstan
to the nation?" and “What should be the dominant identity: civil or
ethnic (national) one?"
Can Kazakhstan being multiethnic country like America, adopt its
experience in the formation of a civic nation? Since it is believed that
the “multi-ethnic state of the population is a characteristic feature of
most modern countries in the world," it states that “inter-ethnic
integration is one of the most important aspects of the problem of
forming a new social community (metaetnic - Kazakh people,
Kazakh nation" [1].
[1] Samsonov, L.V. (2005) 'K voprosu o formirovanii edinoi kazakhstanskoi
nacii', Vestnik KASU: 4.
[2] Beisenova, G. (2009) Problemy globalizacii i identichnosti, Almaty:
Print-s
[3] Shahanov, M. (2009) 'Gosudarstvennyi yiazyk', Egemen Kazakhstan, 15
November, 6(4): 83-112.
[4] Kenneth, L. and Karst, S. (1986) ÔÇÿPaths to Belonging: The Constitution
and Cultural Identity-, North Carolina Law Review, pp. 301-303.
[5] Gadgiev, K.S. (1999) Amerikanskaiya naciya: nacionalnoe
samosoznanie I kultura, Moskva
[6] Makeev, S. (1998) 'Processy socialnoi strukturizacii v sovremennoi
Ukraine', Polis 3:50-51
[7] Kordonskii, S. (2000) Rynki vlasti: administrativnye rynki Rossii I SSSR,
Moskva: ð×GI, 188-190
[8] Izdibaev, T. (2006) 'Statagenstvo podvelo predvaritelnye itogi perepisi
naselenia I socialno-ekonomicheskogo razvitia', Panorama (15): 15
aprelya, 28.
[9] Nysanbaev, ðÉ.N. (1999) 'Problemy duhovno-nravstvennoi bezopanosti
Kazakhstana', Sayasat, 6:28.
[10] Samsonov, L.V. (2005) 'K voprosu o formirovanii edinoi kazakhstanskoi
nacii', Vestnik KASU: 4.
[11] Buluktaev, Y. (2001) Osobennosti identifikacionnyh processov v
Respublike Kazakhstan, Almaty.
[12] Mustafaev, E. (2010) Nacia I nacionalnost, Almaty.
[13] Shadge, A.Y. (1996), Grazhdanskai identichnost, Moskva.
[14] Utalieva, Zh.T. (1994), Yiazyk kak factor formirovanii etnicheskoi
identichnosti, Moskva.
[15] Pogorelyi, A.P. (2004) Patriotizm kak cennost rossiiskogo obshestva,
Moskva, pp. 9-10.
[16] Selivanova, V.Y. (2003) 'Nacionalizm I patriotism: popytka
pereosmaslenia poniatii', Vestnik MGU, 18 (1), pp. 91-93.
[17] Ashimbaev, M.S. (2004) Problemy I perspektivy grazhdanskoi
identifikacii naselenia Kazakhstana, Almaty: KISI, pp. 20 - 21.
[1] Samsonov, L.V. (2005) 'K voprosu o formirovanii edinoi kazakhstanskoi
nacii', Vestnik KASU: 4.
[2] Beisenova, G. (2009) Problemy globalizacii i identichnosti, Almaty:
Print-s
[3] Shahanov, M. (2009) 'Gosudarstvennyi yiazyk', Egemen Kazakhstan, 15
November, 6(4): 83-112.
[4] Kenneth, L. and Karst, S. (1986) ÔÇÿPaths to Belonging: The Constitution
and Cultural Identity-, North Carolina Law Review, pp. 301-303.
[5] Gadgiev, K.S. (1999) Amerikanskaiya naciya: nacionalnoe
samosoznanie I kultura, Moskva
[6] Makeev, S. (1998) 'Processy socialnoi strukturizacii v sovremennoi
Ukraine', Polis 3:50-51
[7] Kordonskii, S. (2000) Rynki vlasti: administrativnye rynki Rossii I SSSR,
Moskva: ð×GI, 188-190
[8] Izdibaev, T. (2006) 'Statagenstvo podvelo predvaritelnye itogi perepisi
naselenia I socialno-ekonomicheskogo razvitia', Panorama (15): 15
aprelya, 28.
[9] Nysanbaev, ðÉ.N. (1999) 'Problemy duhovno-nravstvennoi bezopanosti
Kazakhstana', Sayasat, 6:28.
[10] Samsonov, L.V. (2005) 'K voprosu o formirovanii edinoi kazakhstanskoi
nacii', Vestnik KASU: 4.
[11] Buluktaev, Y. (2001) Osobennosti identifikacionnyh processov v
Respublike Kazakhstan, Almaty.
[12] Mustafaev, E. (2010) Nacia I nacionalnost, Almaty.
[13] Shadge, A.Y. (1996), Grazhdanskai identichnost, Moskva.
[14] Utalieva, Zh.T. (1994), Yiazyk kak factor formirovanii etnicheskoi
identichnosti, Moskva.
[15] Pogorelyi, A.P. (2004) Patriotizm kak cennost rossiiskogo obshestva,
Moskva, pp. 9-10.
[16] Selivanova, V.Y. (2003) 'Nacionalizm I patriotism: popytka
pereosmaslenia poniatii', Vestnik MGU, 18 (1), pp. 91-93.
[17] Ashimbaev, M.S. (2004) Problemy I perspektivy grazhdanskoi
identifikacii naselenia Kazakhstana, Almaty: KISI, pp. 20 - 21.
@article{"International Journal of Business, Human and Social Sciences:50795", author = "Elnura Assyltayeva and Zhanar Aldubasheva and Zhengisbek Tolen", title = "Formation of Civic Identity in the Process of Globalization: The Example of the U.S.A. and Kazakhstan", abstract = "An attempt has been made several times to identify
and discuss the U.S. experience on the formation of political nation in
political science. The purpose of this research paper is to identify the
main aspects of the formation of civic identity in the United States
and Kazakhstan, through the identification of similarities and
differences that can get practical application in making decisions of
national policy issues in the context of globalization, as well as to
answer the questions “What should unite the citizens of Kazakhstan
to the nation?" and “What should be the dominant identity: civil or
ethnic (national) one?"
Can Kazakhstan being multiethnic country like America, adopt its
experience in the formation of a civic nation? Since it is believed that
the “multi-ethnic state of the population is a characteristic feature of
most modern countries in the world," it states that “inter-ethnic
integration is one of the most important aspects of the problem of
forming a new social community (metaetnic - Kazakh people,
Kazakh nation" [1].", keywords = "nation, civic identity, nation building, globalization,
interethnic relations, patriotism", volume = "6", number = "6", pages = "1089-8", }