Evaluation of the End Effect Impact on the Torsion Test for Determining the Shear Modulus of a Timber Beam through a Photogrammetry Approach

The timber beam end effect in the torsion test is
evaluated using binocular stereo vision system. It is recommended by
BS EN 408:2010+A1:2012 to exclude a distance of two to three times
of cross-sectional thickness (b) from ends to avoid the end effect;
whereas, this study indicates that this distance is not sufficiently far
enough to remove this effect in slender cross-sections. The shear
modulus of six timber beams with different aspect ratios is determined
at the various angles and cross-sections. The result of this experiment
shows that the end affected span of each specimen varies depending
on their aspect ratios. It is concluded that by increasing the aspect
ratio this span will increase. However, by increasing the distance
from the ends to the values greater than 6b, the shear modulus trend
becomes constant and end effect will be negligible. Moreover, it is
concluded that end affected span is preferred to be depth-dependent
rather than thickness-dependant.




References:
[1] A. P. Boresi and R. J. Schmidt, Advanced Mechanics of Materials. John
Wiley and sons, 2003.
[2] BS EN 408:2010+A1:2012, “British Standard: Timber structures
Structural timber and glued laminated timber Determination of some
physical and mechanical properties,” BSI Standards Publication, 2012.
[3] L. A. Soltis and D. R. Rammer, “Shear Strength of Unchecked
Glued-Laminated Beams,” Forest Product Journal, vol. 44, pp. 51–57,
1994.
[4] R. Gupta, L. R. Heck, and T. H. Miller, “Experimental Evaluation of
the Torsion Test for Determining Shear Strength of Structural Lumber,”
Journal of Testing and Evaluation, vol. 30, no. 4, p. 283, 2002.
[5] A. M. Khokhar, H. Zhang, D. Ridley-Ellis, and J. Moore, “Determining
the Shear Modulus of Sitka Spruce from Torsion Tests.” in Proceedings
of the 10th World Conference on Timber Engineering, 2008.
[6] R. Gupta and T. Siller, “Shear strength of structural composite lumber
using torsion tests,” vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 110–117, 2005.
[7] R. Gupta, L. R. Heck, and T. H. Miller, “Finite-Element Analysis of the
Stress Distribution in a Torsion Test of Full-Size, Structural Lumber,”
Journal of Testing and Evaluation, vol. 30, no. 4, p. 291, 2002.
[8] Z. Peng and N. Guo-Qiang, “Simultaneous Perimeter Measurement for
3D Object with a Binocular Stereo Vision Measurement System,” Optics
and Lasers in Engineering, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 505–511, 2010.
[9] Christian Wohler, 3D Computer Vision, Efficient Methods and
Applications, 2nd ed. Springer, 2013.
[10] BS EN 13183-1:2002, “British Standard: Moisture content of a piece
of sawn timber. Determination by oven dry method,” BSI Standards
Publication, no. December, 2007.
[11] Y. Li, P. Chen, M. Zhang, Y. Li, A´ . P. Chen, and M. Zhang, “The Vehicle
Distance Measurement System Based on Binocular Stereo Vision,”
Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol. 378, 2016.
[12] ASTM-D198, “Standard Test Methods of Static Tests of Lumber in
Structural Sizes,” ASTM International, pp. 1–27, 2014.