Effect of Marginal Quality Groundwater on Yield of Cotton Crop and Soil Salinity Status

In this paper, effect of marginal quality groundwater
on yield of cotton crop and soil salinity was studied. In this
connection, three irrigation treatments each with four replications
were applied. These treatments were i) use of canal water (T1), ii) use
of marginal quality groundwater from tubewell (T2), and iii)
conjunctive use by mixing with the ratio of 1:1 of canal water and
marginal quality tubewell water (T3).
Water was applied to the crop cultivated in Kharif season 2011; its
quantity has been measured using cut-throat flume. Total 11 watering
each of 50 mm depth have been applied from 20th April to 20th July,
2011. Further, irrigations were stopped due to monsoon rainfall up to
crop harvesting.
Maximum crop yield (seed cotton) was observed under T1 which
was 1,517 kg/ha followed by T3 (mixed canal and tubewell water)
having 1009 kg/ha and T2 i.e. marginal quality groundwater having
709 kg/ha. This concludes that crop yield in T2 and T3 in comparison
to T1was reduced by about 53 and 30% respectively.
It has been observed that yield of cotton crop is below potential
limit for three treatments due to unexpected rainfall at the time of full
flowering season; thus the yield was adversely affected.
However, salt deposition in soil profiles was not observed that is
due to leaching effect of heavy rainfall occurred during monsoon
season.

• Qureshi
• A. L.
• Mahessar A. A.
• Dashti
• R. K.
• Yasin S. M.

• Conjunctive Use
• Cotton Crop
• Groundwater
• Soil Salinity Status
• Water Use Efficiency (WUE).

[1] Planning Commission of Pakistan, “Strategies Plan for five years”,
Government of Pakistan, Islamabad, 1993.
[2] Ahmad, M. M., “Farm Water Management”, Proceedings of the Experts
Consultation on Farm Water Management, PARC and FAO of the
United Nations, Islamabad, P. 42, 1982.
[3] Iqbal Ali, “Irrigation and hydraulic structures Theory, Design and
Practices, Published in Karachi, Pakistan, 1993.
[4] Ben, A., Gal, E., Ityel, L., Dudley, S. Cohen, U., Yermiyaho, E.,
Presnov, I., Zigmond and Shani, U., “Effect of irrigation water salinity
on transpiration and on leaching requirements – A case study for bell
peppers”, Agriculture Water Management, vol. 95 No. 5, pp.587-597,
2008.
[5] Gill, M.A., Chaudhry, M.H. and Afzal, S.N., “Note on: conservation of
water resources in Pakistan”, Pakistan Journal of Water Resources, vol.
8 No. 1, pp. 39-43, 2004.
[6] Qadir, M.B.R. Sharma, A., Bruggeman, R., Choukr-allah and Karageh,
F., “Non Conventional Water Resources and Opportunities for
Augmentation to Achieve Food Security in Water Scarce Countries”,
Agriculture Water Management, vol. 87, No. 1, pp. 2-22, 2007.
[7] Skogerboe, G.V. and Merkely, G.P., “Irrigation maintenance and
operations leaching process,” Water Resources Publications, LLC, P.O.
260026, Highland Ranch, Colorado, U.S.A., pp. 248-254, 1996.
[8] ARI, “Recommendations for Cotton Crop.”, Agriculture Research
Institute, Tando jam, pp. 15, 2010.
[9] Dashti R.A. "effect of conjunctive use of saline ground water and canal
water on the yield and water use efficiency of cotton crop and soil
salinity status” Masters Dissertation submitted to Mehran University of
Engineering & Technology, Jamshoro, Sindh, Pakistan, 2011.
[10] Doorenbos, J. and Pruitt, W.O., “Crop water requirement”, Irrigation
and Drainage Paper No. 24, FAO, Rome, p. 115, 1982
[11] Ahmed, R., “Disposal of saline drainage effluent”, DRIP Newsletter,
vol. 14 No. 8, Drainage and Reclamation Institute of Pakistan, Tando
Jam, pp.2, 1993.
[12] Patra, S.K., Ray, R. and Bhosh, K.K., “Effect of conjunctive use of
brackish water and canal water on summer rice in a coastal saline
waterlogged soil”, Oryza, vol. 36, No. 2, pp. 185-187, 1999.